Fourier analysis of scanning laser polarimetry measurements with variable corneal compensation in glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 2606-2612

  Medeiros, Felipe A ^b   Zangwill, Linda M ^b   Bowd, Christopher ^b   Bernd, Antje S ^b   Weinreb, Robert N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIREFRINGENCE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; POLARIMETER; POLARIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA NERVE CELL; SCANNING LASER POLARIMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THICKNESS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIREFRINGENCE; CORNEA; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; LASERS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0038147111     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0814     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Weinreb RN, Dreher AW, Coleman A, Quigley H, Shaw B, Reiter K. Histopathologic validation of Fourier-ellipsometry measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:557-560.
2. Dreher AW, Reiter K, Weinreb RN. Spatially resolved birefringence of the retinal nerve fiber layer assessed with a retinal laser ellipsometer. Appl Opt. 1992;31:3730-3735.
3. Zhou Q, Knighton RW. Light scattering and form birefringence of parallel cylindrical arrays that represent cellular organelles of the retinal nerve fiber layer. Appl Opt. 1997;36:2273-2285.
4. Weinreb RN, Shakiba S, Zangwill L. Scanning laser polarimetry to measure the nerve fiber layer of normal and glaucomatous eyes. Aro J Ophthalmol. 1995;119:627-636.
5. Tjon-Fo-Sang MJ, Lemij HG. The sensitivity and specificity of nerve fiber layer measurements in glaucoma as determined with scanning laser polarimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:62-69.
6. Choplin NT, Lundy DC, Dreher AW. Differentiating patients with glaucoma from glaucoma suspects and normal subjects by nerve fiber layer assessment with scanning laser polarimetry. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:2068-2076.
7. Sinai MJ, Essock EA, Fechtner RD, Srinivasan N. Diffuse and localized nerve fiber layer loss measured with a scanning laser polarimeter: sensitivity and specificity of detecting glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:154-162.
8. Hoh ST, Greenfield DS, Mistlberger A, et al. Optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:129-135.
9. Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Berry CC, et al. Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:985-993.
10. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Berry CC, et al. Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1993-2003.
11. Weinreb RN, Zangwill LM, Berry CC, Bathija R, Sample PA. Detection of glaucoma with scanning laser polarimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1583-1589.
12. Kwon YH, Hong S, Honkanen RA, Alward WL. Correlation of automated visual field parameters and peripapillary nerve fiber layer thickness as measured by scanning laser polarimetry. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:281-288.
13. Chen YY, Chen PP, Xu L, et al. Correlation of peripapillary nerve fiber layer thickness by scanning laser polarimetry with visual field defects in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:312-316.
14. Dichtl A, Jonas J, Naumann GOH. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in human eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999; 273:474-479.
15. Jindra LF, van Saarloos PP, Eikelbloom RH, Cooper RL. Fourier analysis of the nerve fiber layer by digital imaging techniques. Ophthalmic Surg. 1989;20:370-372.
16. Essock EA, Sinai MJ, Fechtner RD, Srinivasan N, Bryant ND. Fourier analysis of nerve fiber layer measurements from scanning laser polarimetry in glaucoma: emphasizing shape characteristics of the "double hump" pattern. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:444-452.
17. Weinreb RN. Evaluating the retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma using scanning laser polarimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1403-1406.
18. Knighton RW, Huang XR, Greenfield DS. Analytical model of scanning laser polarimetry for retinal nerve fiber layer assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:383-392.
19. Greenfield DS, Knighton RW, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC, Zangwill L, Weinreb RN. Correction for corneal polarization axis improves the discriminating power of scanning laser polarimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:27-33.
20. Garway-Heath DF, Greaney MJ, Caprioli J. Correction for the erroneous compensation of anterior segment birefringence with the scanning laser polarimeter for glaucoma diagnosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1465-1474.
21. klein Brink HB, van Blokland GJ. Birefringence of the human foveal area assessed in vivo with Mueller-matrix ellipsometry. J Opt Soc Am A. 1988;5:49-57.
22. Van Blokland GJ, Verhelst SC. Corneal polarization in the living human eye explained with a biaxial model. J Opt Soc Am A. 1987;4:82-90.
23. Greenfield DS, Knighton RW, Huang X. Effect of corneal polarization axis on assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness by scanning laser polarimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:715-722.
24. Knighton RW, Huang XR. Linear birefringence of the central human cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:82-86.
25. Weinreb RN, Bowd C, Greenfield DS, Zangwill LM. Measurement of the magnitude and axis of corneal polarization with scanning laser polarimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:901-906.
26. Zhou Q, Weinreb RN. Individualized compensation of anterior segment birefringence during scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2221-2228.
27. Weinreb RN, Bowd C, Zangwill LM. Glaucoma detection using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:218-224.
28. Garway-Heath D, Hitchings RA. Sources of bias in studies of optic disc and retinal nerve fibre layer morphology (Commentary). Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:986.
29. Hodapp E, Parrish RK II, Anderson DR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1993:52-61.
30. Bloomfield P. Fourier analysis of time series: an introduction. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2000:3-8.
31. Bracewell RN. The Fourier Transform and its Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
32. Cooley JW, Tukey JW. An algorithm for the machine computation of complex Fourier series. Math Comput. 1965;19:297-301.
33. Zonst E. Understanding the FFT. A tutorial on the Algorithm and Software for Laymen, Students, Technicians and Working Engineers., Titusville, FL: Citrus Press; 2000.
34. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson D. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-845.
35. Efron B, Tibshirani R. An introduction to the bootstrap. Monogr Stat Appl Probability. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1993.
36. Efron B, Tibshirani R. Improvements on cross-validation: the .632+ bootstrap method. J Am Stat Assoc. 1997;92:548-560.
37. Steyerberg EW, Harrel FE, Borsboom GJJM, et al. Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:774-781.
38. Harrel FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361-387.
39. Chernick MR. Bootstrap methods: a practitioner's guide. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1999:23-41.
40. Obuchowski NA, Lieber ML. Confidence intervals for the receiver operating characteristic area in studies with small samples. Acad Radiol. 1998;5:561-571.
41. Margolis DJ, Bilker W, Boston R, et al. Statistical characteristics of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for a simple prognostic model using traditional and bootstrapped approaches. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55:518-524.
42. Horn FK, Jonas JB, Martus P, Mardin CY, Burde WM. Polarimetric measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma diagnosis. J Glaucoma. 1999;8:353-362.
43. Trible JR, Schultz RD, Robinson JC, et al. Accuracy of scanning laser polarimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1298-1304.
44. Paczka JA, Friedman DS, Quigley HA, Barron Y, Vitale S. Diagnostic capabilities of frequency-doubling technology, scanning laser polarimetry, and nerve fiber layer photographs to distinguish glaucomatous damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:188-197.
45. Colen TP, Lemij HG. Prevalence of split nerve fiber layer bundles in healthy eyes imaged with scanning laser polarimetry. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:151-156.