Hierarchical Latent Knowledge Analysis for Co-occurrence Data

Proceedings, Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning

Volumn 2, Issue , 2003, Pages 504-511

  Mamitsuka, Hiroshi ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONCURRENCY CONTROL; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY; PROTEINS; VECTORS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HIERARCHICAL LATENT VARIABLES; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 1942420760     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Bishop, C. M., & Tipping, M. E. (1998). A hierarchical latent variable model for data visualization. IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 20, 281-293.
2. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 39, 1-38.
3. Hofmann, T. (2001). Unsupervised learning by probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Machine Learning, 42, 177-196.
4. Joachims, T. (1999). Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In B. Schölkopf, C. Burges and A. Smola (Eds.), Advances in kernel methods - support vector learning. MIT Press.
5. Li, H., & Abe, N. (1998). Generalizing case frames using a thesaurus and the MDL principle. Computational Linguistics, 24, 217-244.
6. Mewes, H. W., et al. (2002). MIPS: A database for genomes and protein sequences. NAR, 30, 31-34.
7. Rissanen, J. (1978). Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14, 465-471.
8. Scḧlkopf, B., et al. (2001). Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution. Neural Computation, 13, 1443-1471.
9. von Mering, C., Krause, R., Snel, B., Cornell, M., Oliver, S. G., Fields, S., & Bork, P. (2002). Comparative assessment of large-scale datasets of protein-protein interactions. Nature, 417, 399-403.