A revisionist model of suburbanization and sprawl the role of political fragmentation, growth control, and spillovers

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 252-264

  Byun, Pillsung ^a   Esparza, Adrian X ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Growth controls; Spillovers; Suburbanization

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT CONTROL; POLITICAL CHANGE; SPILLOVER EFFECT; SUBURBAN AREA; URBANIZATION;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 19344375407     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X04272252     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Brueckner, Jan. 1998. Testing for strategic interaction among local governments: The case of growth controls. Journal of Urban Economics 44:438-67.
2. _. 2000. Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review 23 (2): 160-71.
3. Carruthers, John, and Gunther Ulfarsson. 2002. Fragmentation and sprawl: Evidence from interregional analysis. Growth and Change 33:312-40.
4. Dowall, David. 1979. The effect of land use and environmental regulations of housing costs. Policy Studies Journal 8:277-88.
5. _. 1982. An examination of population-growth-managing communities. In Environmental policy implementation: Planning and management options and their consequences, ed. Dean E. Mann, 193-205. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
6. _. 1984. The suburban squeeze: Land conversion and regulation in the San Francisco Bay area. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Downs, Anthony. 1999. Some realities about sprawl and urban decline. Housing Policy Debate 10 (4): 955-74.
8. Durbin, Jeffery, D. Roderick Kiewiet, and Charles Noussair. 1992. Voting on growth control measures: Preferences and strategies. Economics and Politics 4 (2): 191-213.
9. Elliott, Michael. 1981. The impacts of growth controls regulations on housing prices in California. Journal of American Real Estate & Urban Economics Association 9 (2): 115-33.
10. Esparza, Adrian, and John Carruthers. 2000. Land use planning and exurbanization in the rural mountain west: Evidence from Arizona. Journal of Planning Education and Research 20 (1): 23-36.
11. Ewing, Reid. 1994. Characteristics, causes, and effects of sprawl: A literature review. Environmentaland Urban Issues 21 (2): 1-15.
12. _. 1997. Is Los Angeles style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association 13 (1): 107-26.
13. Fischel, William. 2001. The homevoter hypothesis: How home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land-usepoli-cies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Frey, William. 1979. Central City white flight: Racial and nonracial causes. American Sociological Review 44:425-48.
15. _. 1980. Black in-migration, white flight, and the changing economic base of the central city. American Journal of Sociology 85 (6): 1396-497.
16. Frieden, Bernard. 1979. The new regulation comes to suburbia. Public Interest 55:15-27.
17. Gordon, Peter, and Harry Richardson. 1997. Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? Journal of the American Planning Associa-tion 63 (1): 95-106.
18. Katz, Lawrence, and Kenneth Rosen. 1987. The interjurisdictional effects of growth controls on housing prices. Journal of Law & Economics 30:149-60.
19. Kunstler, James. 1993. The geography of nowhere: The rise and decline of America's man-made landscape. New York: Touchstone.
20. Landis, John. 1986. Land regulation and the price of new housing: Lessons from three California cities. Journal of the American Plan-ning Association 52 (1):9-21.
21. _. 1992. Do growth controls work? A new assessment. Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (4): 489-508.
22. Levine, Ned. 1999. The effects of local growth controls on regional housing production and population redistribution in California. Urban Studies 36 (12): 2047-68.
23. Lillydahl, Jane, and Larry Singell. 1987. The effects of growth management on the housing market: A review of the theoretical and empirical evidence. Journal of Urban Affairs 9(1): 63-77.
24. Mayer, Christopher, and C. Tsuriel Somerville. 2000. Land use regulation and new construction. Regional Science and Urban Economics 30:639-62.
25. Mieszkowski, Peter, and Edwin Mills. 1993. The causes of metropolitan suburbanization. Journal of Economic Perspectives 7 (3): 135-47.
26. Molotch, Harvey. 1976. The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology 82:309-33
27. Nelson, Arthur, Rolf Pendall, Casey Dawkins, and Gerrit Knaap. 2002. The link between growth management and housing affordability: The academic evidence. Discussion Paper, Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
28. Park, Robert, Ernest Burgess, and Roderick McKenzie. 1925. The city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Peiser, Richard. 2001. Decomposing urban sprawl. Town Planning Review 72 (3): 275-98.
30. Pendall, Rolf. 1999. Do land-use controls cause sprawl? Environment and Planning B 26: 555-71.
31. _. 2000. Local land use regulation and the chain of exclusion. Journal of the American Planning Association 66 (2): 125-42.
32. Persky, Joseph, and Hayder Kurban. 2001. Do federal funds better support cities or suburbs ? Spatial analysis of federal spending in the Chicago metropolis. Discussion Paper, Brookings Institution, Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
33. Pollakowski, Henry, and Susan Wachter. 1990. The effects of landuse constraints on housing price. Land Economics 66 (3): 315-24.
34. Razin, Eran, and Mark Rosentraub. 2000. Are fragmentation and sprawl interlinked? North American evidence. Urban Affairs Review 35 (6): 821-36.
35. Richmond, Henry. 2000. Metropolitan land-use reform: The promise and challenge of majority consensus. In Reflections on regionalization, ed. B. Katz, 9-39. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
36. Rusk, David. 2000. Growth management: The core regional issue. In Reflections on regionalization, ed. B. Katz, 78-106. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
37. Schwartz, Seymour, David Hansen, and Richard Green. 1981. Suburban growth controls and the price of new housing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Managements 8:303-20.
38. Shen, Q. 1996. Spatial impacts of locally enacted growth controls: The San Francisco Bay Region in the 1980s. Environment and Planning B 23:61-91.
39. Singell, Larry, and Jane Lillydahl. 1990. An empirical examination of the effects of impact fees on the housing markets. Land Economics 66 (1): 82-92.
40. Skidmore, Mark, and Michael Peddle. 1998. Do development impact fees reduce the rate of residential development? Growth and Change 29:383-400.
41. Somerville, Tsuriel. 1999. The industrial organization of housing supply: Market activity, land supply and the size of homebuilder firms. Real Estate Economics 27 (4): 669-94.
42. Thorson, James. 1997. The effect of zoning on housing construction. Journal of Housing Economics 6:81-91.
43. Tiebout, Charles. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64 (5): 416-24.
44. Zorn, Peter, David Hansen, and Seymour Schwartz. 1986. Mitigating the price effects of growth controls: A case study of Davis, California. Land Economics 62 (1): 46-57.