Do development impact fees reduce the rate of residential development?

Growth and Change

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 383-400

  Skidmore, Mark ^a   Peddle, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

^b NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOCAL GOVERNMENT; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

DUPAGE COUNTY; ILLINOIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032468393     PISSN: 00174815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.1998.tb00026.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, J.E. 1986. Property taxes and the timing of urban development. Regional Science and Urban Economics 16: 483-492.
2. Altshuler, A.A., and J.A. Gómez-Ibáñez. 1993. Regulation for revenue: The political economy of land use exactions. Washington DC: Brookings Institution; Cambridge MA: The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
3. Brueckner, J.K. 1995. Infrastructure financing and urban development: The economics of impact fees. Manuscript, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
4. Burchell, R.W., and D. Listokin. 1994. Fiscal impact procedures and state of the art, in Lincoln Land Institute, Does land conservation pay?, Resource manual, Cambridge MA.
5. Downing, P.B., and T.S. McCaleb. 1987. The economics of development exactions, in Development exactions, edited by J.E. Frank and R.M. Rhodes. Chicago: American Planning Association, Planners Press, 42-69.
6. Frank. J.E. and R.M. Rhodes (eds.). 1987. Development exactions. Chicago: American Planning Association, Planners Press.
7. Haessel, W. 1988. Measuring goodness of fit in linear and nonlinear models. Southern Economic Journal 44: 648-652.
8. Huffman, F.E., Jr., A.C. Nelson, M.T. Smith, and M.A. Stegman. 1988. Who bears the burden of development impact fees?, in Development impact fees: Policy rationale, practice, theory, and issues, edited by A.C. Nelson. Chicago: American Planning Association, Planners Press, 313-323.
9. Kanemoto, Y. 1985. Housing as an asset and the effects for property taxation on the residential development process. Journal of Urban Economics 17: 145-166.
10. Kelly, E.D. 1993. Managing community growth: Policies, technique, and impacts. Wesrport CT: Praeger.
11. Kennedy, P. 1992. A guide to econometrics. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
12. Markusen, J.R., and D.T. Scheffman. 1978. The timing of residential development: A general equilibrium approach. Journal of Urban Economics 5: 411-424.
13. McMillen, D.P. 1990. The timing and duration of development tax rate increases. Journal of Urban Economics 28: 1-18.
14. Nelson, A.C. (ed.) 1988. Development impact fees: Policy rationale, practice, theory, and issues. Chicago: American Planning Association, Planners Press.
15. Nicholas, J.C., A.C. Nelson, and J.C. Juergensmeyer. 1991. A practitioner's guide to development impact fees. Chicago: American Planning Association, Planners Press.
16. Peddle, M.T., and J.L. Lewis. 1996. Development exactions as growth management and infrastructure finance tools. Public Works Management and Policy 1: 129-144.
17. Polissero, J.P., and D. Fasenfast. 1989. A typology of suburban economic development policy. Economic Development Quarterly 3: 301-311.
18. Shoup, D.C. 1970. The optimal timing of urban land development. Regional Science Association Papers and Proceedings 25: 33-44.
19. Singell, L.D., and J.H. Lillydahl. 1990. An empirical examination of the effect of impact fees on the housing market Land Economics 66: 82-92.
20. Skaburskis, A., and M. Qadeer. 1992. An empirical estimation of the price effects of development impact fees. Urban Studies 29: 653-667.
21. Zax, J.S., and M. Skidmore. 1994. Property tax rate changes and rates of development. Journal of Urban Economics 36: 314-332.