Femoral Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling after Implantation of Custom made Anatomic and Standard Straight Stem Hip Prostheses;Periprothetischer Knochenumbau am proximalen Femur nach Implantation von individual- und Standard-Hüftendoprothesen

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Ihre Grenzgebiete

Volumn 141, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 519-525

  Arabmotlagh, M ^a,b   Hennigs, T ^a   Rittmeister, M ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bone resorption; Custom made prosthesis; DEXA; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMUR; FEMUR SHAFT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESIS; SURGICAL ANATOMY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE REMODELING; BONE RESORPTION; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0242351977     PISSN: 00443220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-42837     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Hughes SS, Furia JP, Smith P, Pellegrini V. Atrophy of the proximal part of the femur after total hip arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 231-239
2. Cohen B, Rushton N. Bone remodelling in the proximal femur after charlney total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77-B: 815-819
3. Kiratli BJ, Checovich MM, McBeath AA, Wilson MA, Heiner JP. Measurement of bone mineral density by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in patients with the wisconsin hip, an uncemented femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 184-193
4. Trevisan C, Bigoni M, Cherubini R, Steiger P, Randelli G, Ortolani S. Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for the evaluation of bone density from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty: Analysis protocols and reproducibility. Calcif Tissue Int 1993; 53: 158-161
5. Jacobs JJ, Sumner DR, Galante JO. Mechanism of bone loss associated with total hip replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 1993; 24 (IV): 583-590
6. Broos P, Fourneau I. Host factors that affect outcome of total hip arthroplasty. Lancet 2000; 355 (9214): 1479-1480
7. Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB. Early aseptic loosening of uncemented femoral components in primary total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77: 11-17
8. Kiratli BJ, Heiner JP, McBeath AA, Wilson MA. Determination of Bone Mineral Density by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 1992; 10: 836-844
9. Kilgus DJ, Shimaoka EE, Tipton JS, Eberle RW. Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorbtiometry measurement of bone mineral density around porous-coated cementless femoral implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75: 279-287
10. Petersen MB, Kolthoff NK, Eiken P. Bone mineral density around femoral stem. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66 (IV): 432-434
11. Ducheyne P, Demeester P, Aernoudt E. Influence of a functional dynamic loading on bone ingrowth into surface pores of orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1977; 11: 811-838
12. Harris WH, White RE, McCarthy JC, Walker PS, Weinberg EH. Bony ingrowth fixation of the acetabular component in canine hip joint arthroplasty. Clin orthop 1983; 176: 7-11
13. Cameron HU, Pilliar RM, Macnab I. The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1973; 7: 301-311
14. Bobyn JD, Glassman AH, Goto H, Krygier JJ, Miller JE, Brooks CE. The effect of stem stiffness on femoral bone resorption after canine porous-coated total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1990; 261: 196-213
15. Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, Engh CA, Miller JE, Brooks C. Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Clin Orthop 1992; 274: 79-96
16. Burke DW, O'Connor DO, Zalenski EB, Jasty M, Harris WH. Micromotion of cemented and uncemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 33-37
17. Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Binnington AG, Szivek JA. The effect of proximally and fully porous-coated canine hip stem design on bone modeling. J Orthop Res 1987; 5: 393-408
18. Engh CA, Bobyn JD. The influence of stem size and extend of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988; 231: 7-28
19. Hennigs T, Arabmotlagh M, Schwarz A, Zichner L. Dosisabhängige Prophylaxe des frühen periprothetischen Knochenschwundes durch Alendronat. Z Orthop 2002; 140: 42-47
20. Hennigs T, Arabmotlagh M, Skripitz R, Zichner L. Risikofaktor für periprothetischen Knochenschwund: Perioperative DEXA-Messung der LWS für Planung und Prophylaxe in der Hüftendoprothetik. Osteologie 2000; 9(Suppl. 1): 74
21. Starker M, Thümmler P, Weipert A, Hannusek S. Computer assistierte Prothesenselektion und Implantationskontrolle. Orthopäde 2000; 29: 627-635
22. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components. Clin Orthop 1979; 141: 17-27
23. Cohen B, Rushton N. Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 479-483
24. Genant HK, Faulkner KG, Glüer CC. Measurement of bone mineral density: Current status. J Med Am 1991; 91 (suppl 5B): 49S-53S
25. Kobayashi S. Poor bone quality or hip structure as risk factors affecting survival of total hip arthroplasty. Lancet 2000; 355 (9214): 1499-1504
26. McCarthy CK, Steinberg GG, Agren M, Leahey D, Wyman E, Baran DT. Quantifying bone loss from the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 774-778