Stone buildings, cyberspace, and the library user

New Library World

Volumn 104, Issue , 2003, Pages 474-480

  Agee, Jim ^a   Antrim, Patricia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic libraries; Databases; Distance learning; Information retrieval; Libraries; Library education

Indexed keywords

EID: 19144364364     PISSN: 03074803     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/03074800310508759     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Allen, G. (1996), “Disintermediation: A disaster or a discipline?”, Proceedings, Online Information, Vol. 96, pp. 29-32.
2. Atkinson, R. (1999), “Toward a redefinition of library services”, in Ed. Johnson, P. and Ed. MacEwan, B. (Eds), Virtually Yours: Models for Managing Electronic Resources and Services, American Library Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 3-19.
3. Burke, L. (2002), “The future of librarians in the virtual library environment”, The Australian Library Journal, pp. 31-45.
4. Camara, L. (2002), personal communication, 21 September.
5. Continuing Board of Higher Education (1998-2002), available at: www.cbhe.state.mo.us/statspg.htm (accessed 3 March 2003).
6. Cullen, R. (2001), “Only connect … a survey of reference services – past, present, and future”, in Ed. Gorman, G.E. (Ed.), Information Services in an Electronic Environment, Scarecrow Press, Lanham, MD, pp. 3-42.
7. de Jager, K. (1997), “Library use and academic achievement”, South African Journal of Library and Information Science, Vol. 65 No. 1, pp. 26-30.
8. Fokker, D. (2003), personal communication, 27 January.
9. Fourie, I. (1999), “Should we take disintermediation seriously?”, The Electronic Library, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 9-16.
10. Gorman, M. (2001), “Values for human-to-human reference”, Library Trends, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 168-182.
11. James C. Kirkpatrick Library Annual Report (1998-2001), available at: http://library.cmsu.edu/main/annual_report.htm (accessed 27 January 2003).
12. Kelley, K.B. and Orr, J.G. (2003), “Trends in distant student use of electronic resources: A survey”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 64 No. 3, pp. 176-191.
13. Lance, K.C. (2001), “Proof of the power: Quality library media programs affect academic achievement”, Multi Media Schools, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 14-20.
14. Myers, G. (2003), personal communication, 13 February.
15. Netcafe (2003), available at: www.netcafeguide.com (accessed 19 May 2003).
16. Pew Internet and American Life Study (2001), The Internet in Education: Findings of the Pew Internet and American Life Project, 1 September 2001, Report 39, available at: www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=39 (accessed 20 February 2003).
17. Proctor, E. (2002), “Boolean operators and the naïve end-user: Moving to AND”, Online, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 34-38.
18. Reidel, S. (2003), personal communication, 4 February.
19. Sales, D. (2003), personal communication, 27 January.
20. Sass, R.K. (2002), “Marketing the worth of your library”, Library Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 37-38.
21. Schulman, S. (1998), “Applying a proactive ounce of prevention: Disintermediation and productivity”, Information Today, Vol. 15 No. 7, pp. 46-47.
22. Sloan, B. (1998), “Service perspectives for the digital library: Remote reference services”, Library Trend, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 117-143.
23. Tenopir, C. (1998), “Reference use statistics”, Library Journal, Vol. 123 No. 8, 1 May, pp. 32-34.
24. van Zijl, C. (2003), personal communication, 27 January.
25. Watson, L.W. (2001), “How do students' perceptions of their library usage influence their educational outcomes”, College Student Journal, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 366-372.
26. Williams, D. and Wavell, C. (2001), “Evaluating the impact of the school library resource center on learning”, School Libraries Worldwide, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 58-71.
27. Young, N. and Von Seggern, M. (2001), “General information seeking In changing times: A focus group study”, Reference and Users Services Quarterly, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 159-169.