The problem of multiple testing and its solutions for genom-wide studies;A "multiple testing" problémája és a genomiális kísérletekre alkalmazott megoldások

Orvosi Hetilap

Volumn 146, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 559-563

  Gyorffy, Balázs ^a   Gyorffy, András ^b   Tulassay, Zsolt ^b  

^a Patológiai Intézet ^*  (Hungary)

^b SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Bonferroni correction; False discovery rate; Multi step; Multiple testing; One step; p value; Positive false discovery rate; q value

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; GENOME ANALYSIS; NULL HYPOTHESIS; PROBABILITY; REVIEW; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; GENOMICS; HUMAN; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; GENOMICS; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 19044384381     PISSN: 00306002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Statist. Soc. B., 1995, 57, 289-300.
2. Bland, J. M., Altman, D. G.: Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ, 1995, 310, 170.
3. Brown, B. W., Russell, K.: Methods of correcting for multiple testing: operating characteristics. Stat. Med., 1997, 16, 2511-2528.
4. Fernando, R. L., Nettleton, D., Southey, B.R. és mtsai: Controlling the proportion of false positives in multiple dependent tests. Genetics, 2004, 166, 611-619.
5. Freemantle, N.: Interpreting the results of secondary end points and subgroup analyses in clinical trials: should we lock the crazy aunt in the attic? BMJ, 2001, 322, 989-991.
6. 6/a. Györffy, B.: Statisztikai módszerek nagyfelbontású array rendszerek kiértékelé sére. Klin. Kis. Lab. Med., 2003, 30, 135-139.
7. 6/b. Györffy A., Györffy B., Molnár B. és mtsai: A hibridizáció és alkalmazása DNS assay rendszerekben. Orv. Hetil., (Közlésre elfogadva)
8. Ludbrook, J.: Multiple comparison procedures updated. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol., 1998, 25, 1032-1037.
9. Ludbrook, J.: Multiple inferences using confidence intervals. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol., 2000, 27, 212-215.
10. Neyman, J., Pearson, E. S.: On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference. Biometrika, 1928, 20A, 175-240.
11. Perneger, T. V.: What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ, 1998, 316, 1236-1238.
12. Savitz, D. A., Olshan, A. F.: Multiple comparisons and related issues in the interpretation of epidemiologic data. Am. J. Epidemiol., 1995, 142, 904-908.
13. Schweder, T., Spjotvoll, E.: Plots of P-values to evaluate many tests simultaneously. Biometrika, 1982, 69, 493-502.
14. Sidak, Z.: On probabilities of rectangles in multivariate Student distributions: their dependence on correlations. Ann. Mat. Stat., 1971, 42, 169-175.
15. Sidak, Z.: Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J. Am. Stat. Ass., 1967, 62, 626-633.
16. Storey, J. D.: A direct approach to false discovery rates. J. R. Statist. Soc. B., 2002, 64, 479-798.
17. Storey, J.D., Tibshirani, R.: Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2003, 100, 9440-9445.
18. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. N. Engl. J. Med., 1997, 336, 309-315.
19. Walter, S. D.: Methods of reporting statistical results from medical research studies. Am. J. Epidemiol., 1995, 141, 896-906.
20. Westfall, P. H., Young, S. S.: Resampling-based multiple testing: Examples and methods for p-value adjustment. Wiley, New York. 1993.