Multiple inferences using confidence intervals

Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 212-215

  Ludbrook, John ^a  

^a NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bonferroni; Effect size; Family wise type I error rate; Holm; Means; Multiple inferences; Odds ratio; Relative risk; Ryan; Step wise procedures

Indexed keywords

DATA ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; REVIEW; RISK; SIMULATION; STATISTICS;

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; ODDS RATIO; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0034014786     PISSN: 03051870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2000.03223.x     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. 1. Ludbrook J. Multiple comparison procedures updated. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 1998; 25: 1032-7.
2. 2. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997; 336: 309-15.
3. 3. Skovlund E. A critical review of papers from clinical cancer research. Acta Oncol. 1998; 37: 339-45.
4. 4. Walter SD. Methods of reporting statistical results from medical research studies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1995; 141: 896-906.
5. 5. Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford. 1994.
6. 6. Ludbrook J, Dudley H. Why permutation tests are superior to t and F tests in biomedical research. Am. Statistician 1998; 52: 127-32.
7. 7. Campbell MJ, Gardner MJ. Calculating confidence intervals for some non-parametric analyses. In: Gardner MJ, Altman DG (eds). Statistics with Confidence: Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines. British Medical Journal, London. 1989; 74.
8. 8. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 1990.
9. 9. Boomsma A, Molenaar JW. Four electronic tables for probability distributions. Am. Statistician 1994; 48: 153-62.
10. 10. Brown BJ, Russell K. Methods correcting for multiple testing: Operating characteristics. Statist. Med. 1997; 16: 2511-28.
11. 11. Morikawa T, Terao A, Iwasaki M. Power evaluations of various modified Bonferroni procedures by a Monte Carlo study. J. Biopharm. Statist. 1996; 6: 343-59.
12. 12. Sankoh AJ, Huque MF, Dubey SD. Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. Statist. Med. 1997; 16: 2529-42.