The lipid/protein interface as xenobiotic target site: Kinetic analysis of tadpole narcosis

FEBS Journal

Volumn 272, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 2399-2406

  Altschuh, Joachim ^a   Walcher, Sebastian ^b   Sandermann Jr , Heinrich ^a,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Ecotoxfreiburg   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adair theory; Kinetic modelling; Lipid protein interface; Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; Tadpole narcosis

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; ANESTHETIC AGENT; CYCLOHEPTANOL; CYCLOHEXANOL; CYCLOOCTANOL; HEPTANOL; HEXANOL; LIPID; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; NICOTINIC AGENT; NICOTINIC RECEPTOR; OCTANOL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; XENOBIOTIC AGENT;

ANESTHESIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG RECEPTOR BINDING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LIPID INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SPECTROSCOPY; TADPOLE; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ANESTHETICS; ANIMALS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; HEXANOLS; HUMANS; LARVA; LIPID METABOLISM; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NICOTINIC ANTAGONISTS; RECEPTORS, NICOTINIC; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; XENOBIOTICS;

EID: 18944369267     PISSN: 1742464X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04657.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Pebay-Peyroula E & Rosenbusch JP (2001) High-resolution structures and dynamics of membrane protein-lipid complexes: a critique. Curr Opin Struct Biol 11, 427-432.
2. Lee AG (2003) Lipid-protein interactions in biological membranes: a structural perspective. Biochim Biophys Acta 1612, 1-40.
3. Bracey MH, Cravatt BF & Stevens RC (2004) Structural commonalities among integral membrane enzymes. FEBS Lett 567, 159-165.
4. Palsdottir H & Hunte C (2004) Lipids in membrane protein structures. Biochim Biophys Acta 1666, 2-18.
5. Marsh D & Horvath LI (1998) Structure, dynamics and composition of the lipid-protein interface. Perspectives from spin-labelling. Biochim Biophys Acta 1376, 267-296.
6. Marsh D & Páli T (2004) The protein-lipid interface: perspectives from magnetic resonance and crystal structures. Biochim Biophys Acta 1666, 118-141.
7. Alvis SJ, Williamson IM, East JM & Lee AG (2002) Interactions of anionic phospholipids and phospatidylenethanolamine with the potassium channel KcsA. Biophys J 85, 3828-3838.
8. Sandermann H (2002) High free energy of lipid/protein interaction in biological membranes. FEBS Lett 514, 340-342.
9. Sandermann H, McIntyre JO & Fleischer S (1986) Site-site interaction in the phospholipid activation of D-β-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem 261, 6201-6208.
10. Loeb-Hennard C & McIntyre JO (2000) (R)-3-Hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase: selective phosphatidylcholine binding by the C-terminal domain. Biochemistry 39, 11928-11938.
11. Carr HS & Winge DR (2003) Assembly of cytochrome c oxidase within the mitochondrion. Acc Chem Res 36, 309-316.
12. Haines TH & Dencher NA (2002) Cardiolipin: a proton trap for oxidative phosphorylation. FEBS Lett 528, 35-39.
13. Seeman P (1972) The membrane actions of anesthetics and tranquilizers. Pharmacol Rev 24, 583-655.
14. Miller KW (1985) The nature of the site of general anesthesia. Int Rev Neurobiol 27, 1-61.
15. Franks NP & Lieb WR (1994) Molecular and cellular mechanisms of general anaesthesia. Nature 367, 607-614.
16. Franks NP & Lieb WR (1998) Which molecular targets are most relevant to general anaesthesia? Toxicol Lett 100-101, 1-8.
17. A and glycine receptors. Nature 389, 385-389.
18. Yamakura T, Bertaccini E, Trudell JR & Harris RA (2001) Anesthetics and ion channels: molecular models and sites of action. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 41, 23-51.
19. Barrantes FJ (2003) Modulation of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor function through the outer and middle rings of transmembrane domains. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 6, 620-632.
20. Miller KW (2002) The nature of sites of general anaesthetic action. Br J Anaesth 89, 17-31.
21. Sandermann H (1993) Induction of lipid-protein mismatch by xenobiotics with general membrane targets. Biochim Biophys Acta 1150, 130-133.
22. Sandermann H & Pflugmacher D (1996) Induction of lipid-protein mismatch by xenobiotics: kinetic cooperativity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1300, 219-225.
23. Walcher S, Altschuh J & Sandermann H (2001) The lipid/protein interface as xenobiotic target site: kinetic analysis of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. J Biol Chem 276, 42191-42195.
24. 2+-ATPase. Biochim Biophys Acta 1415, 174-180.
25. Antollini SS & Barrantes FJ (2002) Unique effects of different fatty acid species on the physical properties of the Torpedo acetylcholine receptor membrane. J Biol Chem 277, 1249-1254.
26. Mantipragada SB, Horvath LI, Arias HR, Schwarzmann G, Sandhoff K, Barrantes FJ & Marsh D (2003) Lipid-protein interactions and effect of local anesthetics in acetylcholine receptor-rich membranes from Torpedo marmorata electric organ. Biochemistry 42, 9167-9175.
27. Miyazawa A, Fujiyoshi Y & Unwin N (2003) Structure and gating mechanism of the acetylcholine receptor pore. Nature 423, 949-955.
28. Sandermann H (1982) Lipid-dependent membrane enzymes. A kinetic model for cooperative activation in the absence of cooperativity in lipid binding. Eur J Biochem 127, 123-128.
29. Alifimoff JK, Firestone LL & Miller KW (1986) Anaesthetic potencies of primary alcohols: implications for the molecular dimensions of the anaesthetic site. Br J Pharmacol 96, 9-16.
30. Curry S, Moss GWJ, Dickinson R, Lieb WR & Franks NP (1991) Probing the molecular dimensions of general anaesthetic target sites in tadpoles (Xenopus laevis) and model systems using cycloalcohols. Br J Pharmacol 102, 167-173.
31. Miller KW, Braswell LM, Firestone LL, Dodson BA & Forman SA (1986) General anesthetics act both specifically and nonspecifically on acetylcholine receptors. In Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Anaesthetics (Roth SH & Miller KW, eds), pp. 125-137. Plenum Press, New York.
32. Forman SA, Miller KW & Yellen G (1995) A discrete site for general anesthetics on a postsynaptic receptor. Mol Pharmacol 48, 574-581.
33. Forman SA (1998) Direct interactions of anesthetics and nonanesthetics with the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor pore. Toxicol Lett 100-101, 169-178.
34. Pruscha H (1996) Angewandte Methoden der Mathematischen Statistik. Teubner, Stuttgart.
35. Munson PL, Mueller RA & Breese GR (1996) Principles of pharmacology. Basic Concepts and Clinical Applications, pp. 10-11. Chapman & Hall, New York.
36. Woodbury JW, D'Arrigo JS & Eyring H (1975) Physiological mechanism of general anesthesia: synaptic blockade. In Molecular Mechanisms of Anesthesia, Progress in Anesthesiology, Vol. 1 (Fink BR, ed.), pp. 53-91. Raven Press, New York.
37. Quinlan JJ, Ferguson C, Jester K, Firestone LL & Homanics GE (2002) Mice with glycine receptor subunit mutations are both sensitive and resistant to volatile anesthetics. Anesth Analges 95, 578-582.
38. Takasaki M, Tatara T, Suezaki Y, Shirahama K, Kamaya H, Ueda I & Totoki T (1991) Effect of inhalation anesthetics on swimming activity of Artermia salina. J Anesth 5, 287-293.
39. + channel-associated peptide in the β-conformation: spin label electron spin resonance studies. Biophys J 73, 2588-2594.
40. Miller AS & Falke JJ (2004) Side chains at the membrane-water interface modulate the signaling state of a transmembrane receptor. Biochemistry 43, 1763-1770.
41. Tang P & Xu Y (2002) Large-scale molecular dynamics simulations of general anesthetic effects on the ion channel in the fully hydrated membrane: the implication of molecular mechanisms of general anesthesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 16035-16040.
42. Ellena JF, Blazing MA & McNamee MG (1983) Lipid-protein interactions in reconstituted membranes containing acetylcholine receptor. Biochemistry 22, 5523-5535.
43. Hansch C, Leo A & Hoekman D (1995) Exploring QSAR. Hydrophobic, Electronic, and Steric Constants, Vol. 2. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
44. Lang S (1965) Algebra. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
45. Tetko IV, Tanchuk VY, Kasheva TN & Villa AEP (2001) Internet software for the calculation of the lipophilicity and aqueous solubility of chemical compounds. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41, 246-252.