Class-inclusion and correspondence models as discourse types: A framework for approaching metaphorical discourse

Language in Society

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 219-238

  Wee, Lionel ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18844440457     PISSN: 00474045     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0047404505050098     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Black, Max (1962). Models and metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2. Blanchard, Ken, & Shula, Don (2001). The little book of coaching: Motivating people to be winners. London: Harper Collins Business.
3. Briner, Bob (1996). The management methods of Jesus: Ancient wisdom for modern business. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.
4. Caballero, Rosario (2003). Metaphor and genre: The presence and role of metaphor in the building review. Applied Linguistics 24:145-67.
5. Cameron, Lynn (1999). Operationalizing 'metaphor' for applied linguistic research. In Lynn Cameron & Graham Low (eds.), Researching and applying metaphor, 3-28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Dawkins, Richard (1986). The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. New York: Norton.
7. Drew, Paul, & Heritage, John (1992). Analyzing talk at work. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 3-65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. _, & Holt, Elizabeth. (1998). Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society 27:495-522.
9. Fairclough, Norman (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Centner, Dedre (1982). Are scientific analogies metaphors? In David S. Miall (ed.), Metaphor: Problems and perspectives, 106-32. Brighton: Harvester.
11. _ (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7:155-70.
12. _, & Bowdle, Brian F. (2001). Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol 16:223-47.
13. _; _;Wolff, Phillip; & Boronat, Consuelo (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In Dedre Gentner et al. (eds.). The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science, 199-253. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
14. Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. (1992). Categorization and metaphor understanding. Psychological Review 99:572-77.
15. _ (1999). Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In Raymond W. Gibbs Jr. & Gerard Steen (eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics, 145-66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. _, & O'Brien, Jennifer E. (1990). Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation of idiomatic meaning. Cognition 36:35-68.
17. Giora, Rachel (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics 8:183-206.
18. _ (1999). On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics 31:919-29.
19. _ (ed.) (2001). Special issue: Models of figurative language. Metaphor and Symbol 16(3-4).
20. _ (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Glucksberg, Sam; Keysar, Boaz; & McGlone, Matthew S. (1992). Metaphor understanding and accessing conceptual schema. Psychological Review 99:578-81.
22. _, & McGlone, Matthew S. (1999). When love is not a journey: What metaphors mean. Journal of Pragmatics 31:1541-58.
23. _; _; & Manfredi, Deanna (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 36:50-67.
24. Goatly, Andrew (1997). The language of metaphors. London: Routledge.
25. Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
26. Goodwin, Charles, & Duranti, Alessandro. (1992). Rethinking context: an introduction. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 1-42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Gribbin, John (1984). In search of Schrodinger's cat: Quantum physics and reality. London: Corgi.
28. Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Speech acts. Syntax and semantics vol. 3, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
29. Gumperz, John J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. _ (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interaction phenomenon, 229-52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Johnstone, Barbara (2002). Discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Komisarjevsky, Chris, & Komisarjevsky, Reina (2000). Peanut butter and jelly management: Tales from parenthood, lessons for managers. New York: Amacon.
33. Lakoff, George (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd ed., 202-51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. _, & Johnson, Mark (1990). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. _. _ (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
36. Levinson, Stephen (1992). Activity types and language. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 66-100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Originally published in Linguistics 17:356-99.
38. Linell, Per (1998). Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualizations and the blending of voices in professional discourse. Text 18:143-57.
39. Low, Graham (1997). Celebrations and SQUID sandwiches: Figurative language and the manipulation of academic writing. Project report, University of York, EFL Unit.
40. Moon, Rosamund (1998). Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
41. Myers, Greg (2003). Discourse studies of scientific popularization: Questioning the boundaries. Discourse Studies 5:265-79.
42. Nattinger, James. R. (1980). A lexical phrase grammar for ESL. TESOL Quarterly 14:337-44.
43. Nayak, Nandini, & Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. (1990). Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116:315-30.
44. Ortony, Andrew (1979). Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review 86:161-80.
45. Sarangi, Srikant (1998). Rethinking recontextualization in professional discourse studies: An epilogue. Text 18:301-18.
46. _ (2000). Activity types, discourse types and interactional hybridity. In Srikant Sarangi & Malcolm Coulthard (eds.), Discourse and social life, 1-27. Harlow: Pearson.
47. _, & Roberts, Celia (1999). Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
48. Scheuer, Jann (2001). Recontextualization and communicative styles in job interviews. Discourse Studies 3:223-48.
49. _ (2003). Habitus as the principle for social practice: A proposal for critical discourse analysis. Language in Society 32:143-75.
50. Searle, John (1979). Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Tannen, Deborah (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Tourangeau, Roger, & Sternberg, Robert (1981). Aptness in metaphor. Cognitive Psychology 13:27-55.
53. _, _ (1982). Understanding and appreciating metaphors. Cognition 11:203-44.
54. Whitney, John O., & Packer, Tina (2000). Power plays: Shakespeare's lessons in leadership and management. New York: Simon & Schuster.
55. Zander, Rosamund Stone, & Zander, Benjamin (2000). The art of possibility. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.