Educational approaches for maximizing arousal in children with multiple and severe disability: New directions for research and practice in early childhood contexts

Pediatric Rehabilitation

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 88-91

  Roberts, Sally ^a,c   Arthur Kelly, Michael ^b   Foreman, Phil ^b   Pascoe, Sue ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^c 546 JRP ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Behaviour states; Early intervention; Multiple disability; Severe disability

Indexed keywords

AROUSAL; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CHILDHOOD DISEASE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DISEASE SEVERITY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MULTIPLE AND SEVERE DISABILITY; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ABNORMALITIES; ABNORMALITIES, MULTIPLE; ADOLESCENT; AROUSAL; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COGNITIVE THERAPY; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; DISABLED CHILDREN; EARLY INTERVENTION (EDUCATION); EDUCATION, SPECIAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PROGNOSIS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 18844416112     PISSN: 13638491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13638490400022428     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disability. Special interest research group: Profound multiple disabilities home page. Available online at: htpp://www.iassid.org, accessed 2 February 2004.
2. Snell ME, Brown F. Instruction of students with severe disabilities, 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2000.
3. Arthur M. Socio-communicative variables and behavior states in students with profound and multiple disabilities: Descriptive data from school settings. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities 2003;38:200-219.
4. Guess D, Roberts S, Rues J. Longitudinal analysis of state patterns and related variables among infants and children with significant disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 2002;27:112-124.
5. Guess D, Roberts S, Siegel-Causey E, Rues J. Replication and extended analysis of behavior state, environmental events, and related variables among individuals with profound disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation 1995;100:36-50.
6. Richards SB, Richards RY. Implications for assessing biobehavioral states in individuals with profound disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 1997;12:79-86.
7. Ault MM, Guy B, Guess D, Bashinski S, Roberts S. Analyzing behavior state and learning environments: Application in instructional settings. Mental Retardation 1995;33:304-316.
8. Guess D, Roberts S, Guy B. Implications of behavior state for the assessment and education of students with profound disabilities. In: Repp AC, Horner RH, editors. Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 1999. pp. 338-394.
9. Guess D, Siegel-Causey E, Roberts S, Rues J, Thompson B, Siegel-Causey D. Assessment and analysis of behavior state and related variables among students with profoundly handicapping conditions. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 1990;15:211-230.
10. Foreman P, Arthur-Kelly M, Pascoe S, Smyth King B. Evaluating the educational experiences of students with profound and multiple disabilities in inclusive and segregated classroom settings: An Australian perspective. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities (in press).
11. Roberts S, Rues J. Using cueing strategies and behavior state analysis to increase alertness and responsiveness among infants with severe cognitive and multiple disabilities. Model Demonstration Project, H324M9900015. Washington, DC: US Department of Education; 1999.
12. Reese MR. Biobehavior analysis of self-injurious behavior in a person with profound handicaps. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 1997;12:87-94.
13. Siegel-Causey E, Bashinski SM. Enhancing initial communication and responsiveness of learners with multiple disabilities: A tri-focus framework for partners. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 1997;12:105-120.
14. Arthur M, Butterfield N, MacKinnon D. Communication intervention for students with severe disability: Results of a partner training program. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 1998;45:97-115.
15. Arthur M, Foreman P, Pascoe S, Butterfield N, Bennett D. Educational programming for students with high support needs: A report of work in progress. Australasian Journal of Special Education 1999;23:64-74.