Critical appraisal of femorofemoral crossover grafts

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 92, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 565-569

  Pursell, R ^a   Sideso, E ^a   Magee, T R ^a   Galland, R B ^a  

^a ROYAL BERKSHIRE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DISEASE COURSE; FALSE ANEURYSM; FEMALE; FEMOROFEMORAL BYPASS; GRAFT INFECTION; GRAFT OCCLUSION; GRAFT PATENCY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION; ISCHEMIA; LIMB SALVAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; ULCER; WOUND HEALING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; FEMORAL VEIN; HUMANS; INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION; ISCHEMIA; LEG; LIMB SALVAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECURRENCE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 18844408316     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4880     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Freeman NE, Leeds FH. Operations on large arteries: application of recent advances. Calif Med 1952; 77: 229-233.
2. Hinchliffe RJ, Alric P, Wenham PW, Hopkinson BR. Durability of femorofemoral bypass grafting after aortouniiliac endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 498-503.
3. Rutherford RB, Part A, Pearce WH. Extra-anatomic bypass: a closer view. J Vasc Surg 1987; 6: 437-446.
4. Perler BA, Burdick JF, Williams GM. Femoro-femoral or ilio-femoral bypass for unilateral inflow reconstruction? Am J Surg 1991; 161: 426-430.
5. Harrington ME, Harrington EB, Haimov M, Schanzer H, Jacobson JH II. Iliofemoral versus femorofemoral bypass: the case for an individualized approach. J Vasc Surg 1992; 16: 841-852.
6. Ng RL, Gillies TE, Davies AH, Baird RN, Horrocks M. Iliofemoral versus femorofemoral bypass: a 6-year audit. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 1011-1013.
7. Criado E, Burnham SJ, Tinsley EA Jr, Johnson G Jr, Keagy BA. Femorofemoral bypass graft: analysis of patency and factors influencing long-term outcome. J Vasc Surg 1993; 18:495-504.
8. Schneider JR, Besso SR, Walsh DB, Zwolak RM, Cronenwett JL. Femorofemoral versus aortobifemoral bypass: outcome and hemodynamic results. J Vasc Surg 1994; 19:43-55.
9. Berce M, Sayers RD, Miller JH. Femorofemoral crossover grafts for claudication: a safe and reliable procedure. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996; 12: 437-441.
10. Nazzal MM, Hoballah JJ, Jacobovicz C, Mohan CR, Martinasevic M, Ryan SM et al. A comparative evaluation of femorofemoral crossover bypass and iliofemoral bypass for unilateral iliac artery occlusive disease. Angiology 1998; 49: 259-265.
11. Lau H, Cheng SWK, Hui J. Eighteen-year experience with femoro-femoral bypass. Aust N Z J Surg 2000; 70: 275-278.
12. Whatling PJ, Gibson M, Torrie EP, Magee TR, Galland RB. Iliac occlusions: stenting or crossover grafting? An examination of patency and cost. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000; 20: 36-40.
13. Pai M, Handa A, Hands L, Collin J. Femoro-femoral arterial bypass is an effective and durable treatment for symptomatic unilateral iliac artery occlusion. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2003; 85: 88-90.
14. Nicoloff AD, Taylor LM Jr, McLafferty RB, Moneta GL, Porter JM. Patient recovery after infrainguinal bypass grafting for limb salvage. J Vasc Surg 1998; 27: 256-263.
15. Galland RB. Sartorius transposition in the management of synthetic graft infection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002; 23: 175-177.
16. Dalman RL, Taylor LM Jr, Moneta GL, Yeager RA, Porter JM. Simultaneous operative repair of multilevel lower extremity occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 1991; 13: 211-219.
17. Nolan KD, Benjamin ME, Murphy TJ, Pearce WH, McCarthy WJ, Yao JS et al. Femorofemoral bypass for aortofemoral graft limb occlusion: a ten-year experience. J Vasc Surg 1994; 19: 851-857.
18. Bosch JL, Hunink MG. Meta-analysis of the results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Radiology 1997; 204: 87-96.
19. Gaines PA, Moss JG, Kinsman R. Iliac angioplasty study. BIAS 2001. British Society of Interventional Radiology.