A comparative evaluation of femorofemoral crossover bypass and Iliofemoral bypass for unilateral iliac artery occlusive disease

Angiology

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 259-266

  Nazzal, Munier M ^a   Hoballah, Jamal J ^a   Jacobovicz, Claudio ^a   Mohan, Chittur R ^a   Martinasevic, Mario ^a   Ryan, Stephen M ^a   Sharp, William J ^a   Kresowik, Timothy F ^a   Corson, John D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FEMOROFEMORAL BYPASS; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT PATENCY; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POLITEF IMPLANT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVASCULARIZATION; VEIN GRAFT;

EID: 0031947271     PISSN: 00033197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000331979804900403     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Fahal AH, McDonald AM, Marston A: Femorofemoral bypass in unilateral iliac artery occlusion. Br J Surg 76:22-25, 1989.
2. Mosley JG, Marston A: Long-term results of 66 femoral-to-femoral bypass grafts: A 9-year follow-up. Br J Surg 70:631-634, 1983.
3. Bunt TJ: Aortic reconstructions versus extra-anatomic bypass and angioplasty. Arch Surg 121:1166-1171, 1986.
4. Kalman PG, Hosang M, Johnston KW, et al: Unilateral iliac disease: The role of iliofemoral bypass. J Vase Surg 6:139-143, 1987.
5. Couch NP, Clowes AW, Whittemore AD, et al: The iliac origin arterial graft: A useful alternative for iliac occlusive disease. Surgery 97:83-87, 1985.
6. Vetto RM: The treatment of unilateral iliac artery occlusion with a transabdominal subcutaneous femorofemoral graft. Surgery 52:1342-1345, 1962.
7. Vetto RM: The femorofemoral shunt: A reappraisal. Am J Surg 112:162-165, 1966.
8. De Laurentis DA, Sala LE, Russel E, et al: A 12-year experience with axillofemoral and femorofemoral bypass operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 147:881-887, 1978.
9. Kretschmer G, Niederle B, Schimper M, et al: Extra-anatomic femorofemoral crossover bypass (ff) vs unilateral orthotopic iliofemoral bypass (IF): An attempt to compare results based on data matching. Eur J Vase Surg 5:75-82, 1991.
10. Ng RL, Gillies TE, Davies AH, et al: Iliofemoral versus femorofemoral bypass: A 6-year audit. Br J Surg 79: 1011-1013, 1992.
11. Eugene J, Goldstone J, Moore WC: Fifteen-year experience with subcutaneous bypass for lower extremity ischemia. Ann Surg 186:177-183, 1972.
12. Harris JP, Flynn WR, Rudo ND, et al: Assessment of donor limb hemodynamics in femorofemoral bypass for claudication. Surgery 90:764-773, 1981.
13. Trimble IR, Stonesifar G, Wilgis EFS, et al: Criteria for femorofemoral bypass from clinical and hemodynamic studies. Ann Surg 175:985-998, 1972.
14. Ehrenfeld WK, Harris JD, Wylie EJ: Vascular steal phenomenon: An experimental study. Am J Surg 116:192-197, 1968.
15. Sumner DS, Strandness DE: The hemodynamics of the femorofemoral shunt. Surg Gynecol Obstet 134:629-636, 1972.
16. Rotrowski JJ, Pearce WH, Jones DN, et al: Aortobifemoral bypass: The operation of choice for unilateral iliac occlusion? J Vase Surg 8:211-218, 1988.
17. A Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study: Donor limb vascular events following femorofemoral bypass surgery. Arch Surg 126:681-686, 1991.
18. Perler BA, Burdick JF, Williams GM: Femorofemoral or iliofemoral bypass for unilateral inflow reconstruction? Am J Surg 161:426-430, 1991.
19. Ricco JB: Unilateral iliac artery occlusive disease: A randomized multicenter trial examining direct revascularization versus crossover bypass. Ann Vase Surg 6:209-219, 1992.
20. Harrington ME, Harrington EB, Haimov M, et al: Iliofemoral versus femorofemoral bypass: The case for an individualized approach. J Vase Surg 16:841-854, 1992.