Eighteen-year experience with femoro-femoral bypass

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 275-278

  Lau, H ^a   Cheng, S W K ^a   Hui, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Femoro femoral bypass; Patency; Surgery; Survival; Vascular

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMOROFEMORAL BYPASS; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; LERICHE SYNDROME; LIMB SALVAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC DISEASES; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; ILIAC ARTERY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034083961     PISSN: 00048682     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01806.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. 1. Cheng SWK, Ting ACW, Lau H, Wong J. Immediate stenting of iliofemoral occlusive lesions: A surgeon's early experiences. J. Endovasc. Surg. 1999; 6: 256-63.
2. 2. Lau H, Cheng SWK. Intra-operative endovascular stenting of iliac artery: An adjunct to femoro-popliteal bypass. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 1998; 186: 408-15.
3. 3. Schneider JR, Besso SR, Walsh DB, Zwolak RM, Cronenwett JL. Femorofemoral versus aortobifemoral bypass: Outcome and hemodynamic results. J. Vasc. Surg. 1994; 19: 43-55.
4. 4. Eugene J, Goldstone J, Moore WS. Fifteen year experience with subcutaneous bypass grafts for lower extremity ischemia. Ann. Surg. 1977; 186: 177-83.
5. 5. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: Revised edition. J. Vasc. Surg. 1997; 26: 517-38.
6. 6. Rutherford RB. Options in the surgical management of aortoiliac occlusive disease: A changing perspective. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1999; 7: 5-12.
7. 7. Self SB, Richardson JD, Klamer TW, Kaebnick HW, Lambert GE, Mitchell RA. Utility of femorofemoral bypass. Comparison of results with indications for operation. Am. Surg. 1991; 57: 602-6.
8. 8. Plecha FR, Pories WJ. Extra-anatomic bypasses for aortoiliac disease in high-risk patients. Surgery 1976; 80: 480-7.
9. 9. Criado E, Burnham SJ, Tinsley Jr EA, Johnson Jr G, Keagy BA. Femorofemoral bypass graft: Analysis of patency and factors influencing long-term outcome. J. Vasc. Surg. 1993; 18: 495-504.
10. 10. Harrington ME, Harrington EB, Haimov M, Schanzer H, Jacobson JH. Iliofemoral versus femorofemoral bypass: The case for an individualized approach. J. Vasc. Surg. 1992; 16: 841-52.
11. 11. Kalman PG, Hosang M, Johnston KW, Walker PM. The current role for femorofemoral bypass. J. Vasc. Surg. 1987; 6: 71-6.
12. 12. Rutherford RB, Patt A, Pearce WH. Extra-anatomic bypass: A closer view. J. Vasc. Surg. 1987; 6: 437-46.
13. 13. Burnham SJ, Jaques P, Burnham CB. Non-invasive detection of iliac artery stenosis in the presence of superficial femoral obstruction. J. Vasc. Surg. 1992; 3: 445-52.
14. 14. Flanigan DP, Ryan TJ, Williams LR, Schwartz JA, Gray B, Schuler JJ. Aortofemoral or femoropopliteal revascularization? A prospective evaluation of the papaverine test. J. Vasc. Surg. 1984; 1: 215-23.
15. 15. Archie JP. The value of donor iliac artery pressure gradients in predicting the outcome of femorofemoral bypass. J. Vasc. Surg. 1996; 23: 383-93.