Evidence for the correcting-mechanism explanation of the Kanizsa amodal shrinkage

Perception

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 289-303

  Mitsudo, Hiroyuki ^a,b   Nakamizo, Sachio ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18744396729     PISSN: 03010066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/p5178     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andersen B L, Nakayama K, 1994 "Toward a general theory of stereopsis: Binocular matching, occluding contours, and fusion" Psychological Review 101 414-445
2. Cohen J, MacWhinney B, Flatt M, Provost J, 1993 "PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers" Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 25 257-271
3. DeLucia P R, Hochberg J, 1991 "Geometrical illusions in solid objects under ordinary viewing conditions" Perception & Psychophysics 50 547-554
4. Ee R van, Erkelens C J, 2000 "Is there an interaction between perceived direction and perceived aspect ratio in stereoscopic vision?" Perception & Psychophysics 62 910-926
5. Gerbino W, 1975 "Perceptual transparency and phenomenal shrinkage of visual objects" Italian Journal of Psychology 2 403-415
6. Gillam B, 1971 "A depth processin theory of the Poggendorff illusion" Perception & Psychophysics 10 211-216
7. Gillam B, Nakayama K, 1999 "Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone" Vision Research 39 109-112
8. Gregory R L, Harris J P, 1975 "Illusion-destruction by appropriate scaling" Perception 4 203-220
9. Grove P M, Gillam B, Ono H, 2002 "Content and context of monocular regions determine perceived depth in random dot, unpaired background and phantom stereograms" Vision Research 42 1859-1870
10. Häkkinen J, Nyman G, 2001 "Phantom surface captures stereopsis" Vision Research 41 187- 199
11. Howard I P, 1995 "Depth from binocular rivalry without spatial disparity" Perception 24 67-74
12. Howard I P, Rogers B J, 2002 Seeing in Depth: volume II. Depth Perception (Toronto: Porteous)
13. Kanizsa G, 1975 "Amodal completion and phenomenal shrinkage of visual surfaces" Italian Journal of Psychology 2 187-195
14. Kanizsa G, 1979 Organization in Vision (New York: Praeger)
15. Liu L, Stevenson S B, Schor C M, 1994 "Quantitative stereoscopic depth without binocular correspondence" Nature 367 66-69
16. Metelli F, 1974 "The perception of transparency" Scientific American 230(4) 90-98
17. Nakayama K, Shimojo S, 1990 "Da Vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points" Vision Research 30 1811-1825
18. Ohtsuka S, Ono H, 2002 "Correct 3-D but illusory 2-D percepts linked to binocularly unpaired regions", in Proceedings of SPIE 4864 (Three-Dimensional TV, Video, and Display Eds B Javidi, F Okano) 167-174
19. Ono H, Gonzales E, Ohtsuka S, Steinbach M, 1999 "Exploring the causes of the Kanizsa amodal shrinkage" Perception 28 Supplement, 43
20. Ono H, Lillakas L, Grove P M, Suzuki M, 2003 "Leonardo's constraint: Two opaque objects cannot be seen in the same direction" Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 253-265
21. Ono H, Wade N J, Lillakas L, 2002 "The pursuit of Leonardo's constraint" Perception 31 83-102
22. Pelli D G, Pareil B, 1999 "Why use noise?" Journal of the Optical Society of America A 16 647-653
23. Pianta M J, Gillam B J, 2003 "Paired and unpaired features can be equally effective in human depth perception" Vision Research 43 1-6
24. Spehar B, Gillam B, 2002 "Modal completion in the Poggendorff illusion: Support for the depth-processing theory" Psychological Science 13 306-312
25. Vezzani S, 1999 "Shrinkage and expansion by amodal completion: a critical review" Perception 28 935-947