Is there an interaction between perceived direction and perceived aspect ratio in stereoscopic vision?

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 62, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 910-926

  Van Ee, Raymond ^a,b   Erkelens, Casper J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL ILLUSION;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION DISPARITY;

EID: 0034220105     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03212077     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ANDERSON, B. L., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1994). Toward a general theory of stereopsis: Binocular matching, occluding contours, and fusion. Psychological Review, 101, 414-445.
2. BANKS, M. S., VAN EE, R., & BACKUS, B. T. (1997). The computation of binocular visual direction: A re-examination of Mansfield and Legge (1996). Vision Research, 37, 1605-1610.
3. CHAPANIS, A., & MANKIN, D. A. (1967). The vertical-horizontal illusion in a visually-rich environment. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 249-255.
4. DROBNIS, B. J., & LAWSON, R. B. (1976). The Poggendorff illusion in stereoscopic space. Perception & Motor Skills, 42, 15-18.
5. ERKELENS, C. J., MUIJS, A. J. M., & VAN EE, R. (1996). Binocular alignment in different depth planes. Vision Research, 36, 2141-2147.
6. ERKELENS, C. J., & VAN DE GRIND, W. A. (1994). Binocular visual direction. Vision Research, 34, 2963-2969.
7. ERKELENS, C. J., & VAN EE, R. (1997a). Capture of visual direction: An unexpected phenomenon in binocular vision. Vision Research, 37, 1193-1196.
8. ERKELENS, C. J., & VAN EE, R. (1997b). Capture of visual direction of monocular objects by adjacent binocular objects. Vision Research, 37, 1735-1745.
9. FICK, A. (1852). Erörterung eines physiologisch-optischen phänomens. Zeitschrift für rationelle Medizin, 2, 83-94.
10. FINGER, F. W., & SPELT, D. K. (1947). The illustration of the horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 243-249.
11. GOGEL, W. C. (1963). Visual perception of size and distance. Vision Research, 3, 101-120.
12. GOGEL, W. C. (1975). Depth adjacency and the Ponzo illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 125-132.
13. GREGORY, R. L. (1963). Distortion of visual space as inappropriate constancy scaling. Nature, 199, 678-679.
14. GYOBA, J. (1978). The Poggendorff illusion under stereopsis. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 37, 94-101.
15. HIGASHIYAMA, A. (1996). Horizontal and vertical distance perception: The discorded-orientation theory. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 259-270.
16. HOWARD, I. P., & ROGERS, B. J. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. JULESZ, B. (1971). Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. KANIZSA, G. (1972). Schrumpfung von visuellen Feldern bei amodaler Ergänzung. Studia Psychologica, 14, 208-210.
19. KÜNNAPAS, T. M. (1955). Influence of frame size on apparent length of a line. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 168-170.
20. KÜNNAPAS, T. M. (1959). The vertical-horizontal illusion in artificial fields. Journal of Psychology, 47, 41-48.
21. LILLAKAS, L., ONO, H., & GROVE, P. M. (1998). The visual system's solution to Leonardo Da Vinci's paradox when both the occluder and the background are fused [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 39, S615.
22. LIU, C. H., & KENNEDY, J. M. (1995). Misalignment effects in 3-D versions of Poggendorff displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 409-415.
23. MAPP, A. P., & ONO, H. (1999). Wondering about the wandering cyclopean eye. Vision Research, 39, 2381-2386.
24. OHTSUKA, S., & ONO, H. (1998). Adjustment for displacement and compression triggered by pictorial cue of occlusion produces correct 3-D perception and Kanizsa's illusion [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 39, S850.
25. ONO, H., & MAPP, A. P. (1995). A restatement and modification of Wells-Hering's laws of visual direction. Perception, 24, 237-252.
26. PRINZMETAL, W., & GETTLEMAN, L. (1993). Vertical-horizontal illusion: One eye is better than two. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 81-88.
27. REGAN, D., & HAMSTRA, S. J. (1991). Shape discrimination for motion-defined and contrast-defined form: Squareness is special. Perception, 20, 315-336.
28. REGAN, D., & HAMSTRA, S. J. (1992). Shape discrimination and the judgment of perfect symmetry: Dissociation of shape from size. Vision Research, 32, 1845-1864.
29. REGAN, D., & HAMSTRA, S. J. (1994). Shape discrimination for rectangles defined by disparity alone, by disparity plus luminance and by disparity plus motion. Vision Research, 34, 2277-2291.
30. SCHOR, C. M. (1999). Binocular vision. In K. Devalois (Ed.), Seeing: Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
31. SLEIGHT, R. B., & AUSTIN, T. R. (1952). The horizontal-vertical illusion in plane geometric figures. Journal of Psychology, 33, 279-289.
32. SUZUKI, M., SEGAL, O., LILLAKAS, L., & ONO, H. (1998). The visual system's solution to Leonardo Da Vinci's paradox when retinal disparity between the occluder and the background is large [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 39, S618.
33. TEDFORD, W. H., & TUDOR, L. L. (1969). Tactual and visual illusions in the T-shaped figure. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 199-201.
34. VAN DE GRIND, W. A., ERKELENS, C. J., & LAAN, A. C. (1995). Binocular correspondence and visual direction. Perception, 24, 215-235.
35. VAN EE, R., BANKS, M. S., & BACKUS, B. T. (1999). Perceived visual direction near an occluder. Vision Research, 39, 4085-4097.
36. VAN EE, R., & ERKELENS, C. J. (1995). Binocular perception of slant about oblique axes relative to a visual frame of reference. Perception, 24, 299-314.
37. VENIAR, F. A. (1948). Difference thresholds for shape distortion of geometrical squares. Journal of Psychology, 26, 461-476.