Bond-graph based substructuring of dynamical systems

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 687-703

  Gawthrop, P J ^a   Wallace, M I ^b   Wagg, D J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bond graphs; Numerical experimental substructuring; Real time control

Indexed keywords

ACTUATORS; CODES (STANDARDS); GRAPH THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

BOND-GRAPHS; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; SUBSTRUCTURING; VIRTUAL ACTUATORS;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

DYNAMIC RESPONSE;

EID: 18744385501     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.450     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Wagg DJ, Stoten DP. Substructuring of dynamical systems via the adaptive minimal control synthesis algorithm. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:865-877.
2. Darby AP, Blakeborough A, Williams MS. Improved control algorithm for real-time substructure testing. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:431-448.
3. Sharon A, Hogan N, Hardt DE. Controller design in the physical domain. Journal of the Franklin Institute 1991; 328(5):697-721.
4. Gawthrop PJ. Physical model-based control: A bond graph approach. Journal of the Franklin Institute 1995; 332B(3):285-305.
5. Costello DJ, Gawthrop PJ. Physical-model based control: Experiments with a stirred-tank heater. Transactions IChemE, Part A 1997; 27 :361-370.
6. Gawthrop PJ, Ballance DJ, Vink D. Bond graph based control with virtual actuators. In Giambiasi N, Frydman C (eds), Proceedings of the 13th European Simulation Symposium: Simulation in Industry, pp. 813-817, Marseille, France, October 2001. SCS. ISBN 90-77039-02-3.
7. Gawthrop PJ. Bond graph based control using virtual actuators. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I. Journal of Systems and Control Engineering 2004; 218(4):251-268.
8. Nakashima M, Kato H, Takaoka E. Development of real-time pseudo dynamic testing. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21:79-92.
9. Donea J, Magonette P, Negro P, Pegon P, Pinto A, Verzeletti G. Pseudodynamic capabilities of the ELSA laboratory for earthquake testing of large structures. Earthquake Spectra 1996; 12(1):163-180.
10. Lin YY, Chang KC, Wang YL. Comparison of displacement coefficient method and capacity spectrum method with experimental results of RC columns. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33:35-48. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.336.
11. Williams MS, Blakeborough A. Laboratory testing of structures under dynamic loads: an introductory review. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 2001; 359:1651-1669.
12. Blakeborough A, Williams MS, Darby AP, Williams DM. The development of real-time substructure testing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 2001; 359:1869-1891.
13. Darby AP, Blakeborough A, Williams MS. Real-time substructure tests using hydraulic actuator. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2001; 125(10):1133-1139.
14. Wallace MI, Wagg DJ, Neild SA. A polynomial based forward prediction algorithm for improving the accuracy of real-time dynamic substructuring. Submitted to Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 2004.
15. Paynter HM. Analysis and Design of Engineering Systems. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass., 1961.
16. Gawthrop PJ, Scavarda S. Special issue on bond graphs: Editorial. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering 2002; 216(I1):i-v (March 2002).
17. Karnopp D, Margolis DL, Rosenberg RC. System Dynamics: Modeling and Simulation of Mechatronic Systems. Horizon Publishers and Distributors Inc, 3rd edition, January 2000.
18. Mukherjee A, Karmakar R. Modelling and Simulation of Engineering Systems through Bondgraphs. Alpha Science, 2000.
19. Gawthrop PJ, Smith LPS. Metamodelling: Bond Graphs and Dynamic Systems. Prentice Hall: Hemel Hempstead, U.K., 1996. ISBN 0-13-489824-9.
20. Ljung L, Glad T. Modeling of Dynamic Systems. Prentice Hall, 1994.
21. Cellier FE. Continuous System Modelling. Springer-Verlag, 1991.
22. Algaard W, Agar A, Bicanic N. Enhanced integral form of the Newmark time stepping scheme for pseudodynamic testing. Engineering Computations 2001; 18(3):676-689.
23. Horiuchi T, Inoue M, Konno T, Namita Y. Real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999; 28:1121-1141.
24. Horiuchi T, Konno T. A new method for compensating actuator delay in real-time hybrid experiments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 2001; 359:1893-1909.
25. MTT. MTT: Model transformation tools. Online WWW Home Page, 2002. URL: http://mtt.sourceforge.net.
26. Sen PC. Principles of Electrical Machines and Power Electronics. Wiley, 2nd edition, 1997.
27. Wang L, Cluett WR. From Plant Data to Process Control. Taylor and Francis: London, 2000.
28. Gawthrop PJ. Physically-plausible models for identification. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Bond Graph Modeling and Simulation (ICBGM'03), Simulation Series, Orlando, Florida, U.S.A., January 2003. Society for Computer Simulation.
29. Gawthrop PJ. Sensitivity bond graphs. Journal of the Franklin Institute 2000; 337(7):907-922.
30. Ashwin P. Non-linear dynamics, loss of synchronization and symmetry breaking. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering 1998; 212(3):183-187.
31. Ngwompo RF, Gawthrop PJ. Bond graph based simulation of nonlinear inverse systems using physical performance specifications. Journal of the Franklin Institute 1999; 336(8):1225-1247.
32. Ngwompo RF, Scavarda S, Thomasset D. Physical model-based inversion in control systems design using bond graph representation, Part 1: Theory. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering 2001; 215(2):95-103.
33. Ngwompo RF, Scavarda S, Thomasset D. Physical model-based inversion in control systems design using bond graph representation, Part 2: Applications. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering 2001; 215 (2):105-112.
34. Gawthrop PJ, Ballance DJ. Symbolic algebra and physical-model-based control. Computing and Control Journal 1997; 8(2):70-76.
35. Karnopp DC. Bond graphs in control: Physical state variables and observers. Journal of the Franklin Institute 1979; 308 (3):221-234.
36. Krstic M, Kanellakopoulos I, Kokotovic PV. Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design. Wiley: New York, 1995.
37. Yeh T-J. Backstepping design in the physical domain. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 1999.
38. Yeh T-J. Backstepping control in the physical domain. Journal of the Franklin Institute 2001; 338:455-479.