Pulse rate matching by cochlear implant patients: Effects of loudness randomization and electrode position

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 316-325

  Pijl, S ^a  

^a ST PAUL S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; PULSE RATE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRODES; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; PITCH PERCEPTION; RANDOM ALLOCATION;

EID: 0030828950     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199708000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Blarney, P. J., Parisi, E. S., & Clark, G. M. (1995). Pitch matching of electric and acoustic stimuli. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 104(Suppl. 166), 220-222.
2. Burns, E. M., & Viemeister, N. F. (1976). Nonspectral pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 863-869.
3. Burns, E. M., & Viemeister, N. F. (1981). Played-again SAM: Further observations on the pitch of amplitude-modulated noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 1655-1660.
4. Busby, P. A., Whitford, L. A., Blarney, P. J., Richardson, L. M., & Clark, G. M. (1994) Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the Cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 2658-2669.
5. Davis, H., Silverman, S. R., & McAuliffe, D. R. (1951). Some observations on pitch and frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 23, 40-42.
6. Dobie, R. A., & Dillier, N. (1985). Some aspects of temporal coding for single-channel electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hearing Research, 18, 41-55.
7. Eddington, D. K., Dobelle, W. H., Brackmann, D. W., Mladejovsky, M. G., & Parkin, J. L. (1978). Auditory prosthesis research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 87(Suppl. 53), 5-39.
8. Houtsma, A. J. M., & Smurzynski, J. (1990). Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 304-310.
9. Jenkins, R. A. (1961). Perception of pitch, timbre, and loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 1550-1557.
10. McKay, C. M., McDermott, H. J., Clark, G. M. (1996). The perceptual dimensions of single-electrode and nonsimultaneous dual-electrode stimuli in cochlear implantees. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1079-1090.
11. Miller, G. A., & Taylor, W. G. (1948). The perception of repeated bursts of noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 20, 171-182.
12. Muller, C. (1981). Survey of cochlear implant work. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, S52.
13. Nelson, D. A., Van Tasell, D. J., Schroder, A. C., & Soli, S. (1995). Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 1987-1999.
14. Pfingst, B. E., & Rush, N. L. (1987). Discrimination of simultaneous frequency and level changes in electrical stimuli. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 96(Suppl. 128), 34-37.
15. Pijl, S., & Schwarz, D. W. F. (1995a). Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 886-895.
16. Pijl, S., & Schwarz, D. W. F. (1995b). Intonation of musical intervals by deaf subjects stimulated with single bipolar cochlear implant electrodes. Hearing Research, 89, 203-211.
17. Platt, J. R., & Racine, R. J. (1985). Effect of frequency, timbre, experience, and feedback on musical tuning skills. Perception and Psychophysics 38, 543-553.
18. Shannon, R. V. (1983). Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hearing Research, 11, 157-189.
19. Shannon, R. V., Adams, D. D., Ferrel, R. L., Palumbo, R. L., & Grandgenett, M. (1990). A computer interface for psychophysical and speech research with the Nucleus cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 905-907.
20. 0 changes on the pitch and timbre of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 2650-2661.
21. Small, A. M. (1955). Some parameters influencing the pitch of amplitude modulated signals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 751-760.
22. Small, A. M., & McClellan, M. E. (1963). Pitch associated with time delay between two pulse trains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 1246-1255.
23. Tong, Y. C., Blamey, P. J., Dowell, R. C., & Clark, G. M. (1983). Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74, 73-80.
24. Townshend, B., Cotter, N., Van Compernolle, D., & White, R. L. (1987). Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 106-115.