Using the critical didactic incidents method to analyze the content taught

Journal of Teaching in Physical Education

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 127-148

  Amade Escot, Chantal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

Classroom interactions; Content knowledge; Didactic contract; Shared practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 18444386816     PISSN: 02735024     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jtpe.24.2.127     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Amade-Escot, C. (1991). Caractérisation de la formation didactique initiale des enseignants d'éducation physique et évaluation de ses retombées sur les compétences professionnelles [Characteristics of physical education teacher training in didactics and assessment of its effects on the professional abilities acquired by novice teachers]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, STAPS, Université de Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
2. Amade-Escot, C. (1999). Evaluer l'activité didactique: intérêt de la méthode des incidents critiques didactiques. [Assessing didactical activity: Interest of critical didactic incident method]. Revue Mesure et Evaluation en Education, 21(3), 21-42.
3. Amade-Escot, C. (2000a). The contribution of two research program on teaching content: PCK and Didactics of physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20, 78-101.
4. Amade-Escot, C. (2000b). How students manage the didactic contract? Contribution of the didactic perspective to research in physical education classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED442786).
5. Amade-Escot, C. (in press). Student learning within the didactique tradition. In D. Kirk, M. O'Sullivan, & D. Macdonald (Eds.). Handbook of research in physical education. California: Sage.
6. Amade-Escot, C., & Marsenach, J. (1995). Didactique de l'éducation physique et sportive: questions théoriques et méthodologies [Didactics in physical education: Theoretical and methodological aspects]. Grenoble: La pensée sauvage/INRP.
7. Bain, L.L. (1989). Interpretive and critical research in sport and physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 21-24.
8. Brousseau, G. (1978). L'observation des activités didactiques [Observation of the didactic activities]. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 45, 130-139.
9. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. Translated and edited by N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warlfield. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.
10. Brunelle, J., Drouin, D., Godbout, P., & Tousignant, M. (1988). La supervision de l'intervention en activité physique [Supervision in physical activity], Montréal: Gaétan et Morin. Editeur Ltée.
11. Byra, M. (1991). Preservice teachers' perceptions of success and nonsuccess in teaching. Canadian Journal of Health Physical Education and Recreation, 57(3), 13-18.
12. Byra, M., & Goc Karp, G. (2000). Data collection techniques employed in qualitative research in physical education teacher education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 19, 246-266.
13. Calderhead, J. (1981). A psychological approach to research on teacher's classroom decision-making. Education for Teaching, 5(1), 75-83.
14. Chevallard, Y. (1991). La transposition didactique: Du savoir savant au savoir enseigné [Didactic transposition: from the scholarly knowledge to the knowledge taught]. 2nd ed. Grenoble: La pensée sauvage.
15. Curtner-Smith, M.D. (1996). The impact of an early field experience on preservice physical educators' conceptions of teaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15, 224-250
16. De Landsheere, G. (1979). Dictionnaire de l'évaluation et de la recherche en éducation. [French dictionary for evaluation and educational research]. Paris: PUF.
17. Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
18. Dostie, S. (1996). Analyse d'incidents disciplinaires vécus par les éducateurs physiques au primaire [Analysis of disciplinary incident as felt by physical educators in primary school]. Unpublished Master thesis, Département des sciences de l'activité physique. Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières. Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada.
19. Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53, 159-199.
20. Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.) Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.; pp. 392-431). New York: Macmillan.
21. Dufor, F., & Amade-Escot, C. (2001, October). La transmission chorégraphique chez Pina Bausch - Analyse didactique d'une répétition. [Pina Bausch teaching her choreography: didactic analysis of a rehearsal] Paper presented at the Tanzwissenschaftliches Symposium. International Congress "Tanz zwischen den kulturen: Tanz als medium der interkulturellen bildung und identitatsentwicklung", Stuttgart, Germany.
22. Finch, C. (1993). The high performance workplace and the evolving nature of vocational education research. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 18(2), 1-19.
23. Flanagan, J.C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327-358
24. Florence, J., Brunelle, J., & Carlier, G. (1998). Enseigner l'éucation physique au secondaire. [Teaching physical education in secondary schools]. Bruxelles: De Boëk.
25. Gagnon, J., Martel, D., Spallanzani, C. & Brunelle, J.P. (1997). Manifestations d'iniquité au gymnase révélées par des éducateurs et des éducatrices physiques [Expressions of iniquities in the gymnasium revealed by male and female physical educators]. Avante, 3(1), 34-45.
26. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Doubleday.
27. Hastie, P., & Siedentop, D. (1999). An Ecological Perspective on Physical Education. European Physical Education Review, 5(1), 9-29.
28. Hillison, J. (1990). Using all the tools available to vocational education researchers. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 15(1), 1-8.
29. Hole, S., & Hall McEntee, G. (1999). Reflection is at the heart of practice. Educational Leadership, 56(8), 34-37.
30. Jensen, A.C. (1951). Determining critical requirements for teachers. Journal of Experimental Education, 20, 79-86.
31. Locke, L.F. (1989). Qualitative research as a form of scientific inquiry in sport and physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 1-20.
32. Loquet, M., Gamier, A., & Amade-Escot, C (2002). Transmission des savoirs en activités physiques, sportives et artistiques dans des institutions différentes: enseignement scolaire, entraînement sportif, transmission chorégraphique [Transmission of physical activities knowledge in different institutions: Middle-school, high level sport center, dance company]. Revue française de pédagogie, 141, 99-109.
33. Marsenach, J., Dhellemmes, R., Goirand, P., Lebas, A., Leziart, Y., Loquet, M., Roche, J., Roussel, F. (1991). EPS: Quel enseignement ? [PE: what type of teaching]. Paris: INRP.
34. Martel, D., Gagnon, J., & Tousignant, M. (2002). Physical education teachers' and students' views of injustices in the gymnasium. Avante, 8(1), 55-68.
35. Mercier, A., Schubauer-Léoni, M.L., & Sensevy. G. (Eds.) (2002). Vers une didactique comparée. [Toward comparative didactics, special issue]. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 141, 5-16.
36. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
37. O'Sullivan, M., & Tsangaridou, N. (1992). What undergraduate physical education majors learn during a field experience. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 381-392.
38. Parker, J. (1995). Secondary teachers' views of effective teaching in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14, 127-139.
39. Placek, J., & Dodds, P. (1988). A critical incident study of preservice teachers' beliefs about teaching success and nonsuccess. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 351-358.
40. Redmann, D.H., Lambrecht, J.J., & Stiit-Godhes, W.L. (2000). The critical incident technique: A tool for qualitative research. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 42(3), 132-153.
41. Sage, G.H. (1989). A commentary on qualitative research as a form of scientific inquiry in sport and physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 25-29.
42. Schubauer-Leoni, M.L., & Grossen, M. (1993). Negotiating the meaning of questions in didactic and experimental contracts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4, 451-471.
43. Schubauer-Léoni, M.L., & Leutenegger, F. (2002). Expliquer et comprendre dans une approche clinique/expérimentale du didactique ordinaire [To explain and to comprehend in a clinic/experimental approach of the everyday didactic]. In F. Leutenegger & M. Saada-Robert (Eds.). Expliquer et comprendre en sciences de l'éducation (pp. 227 251). Bruxelles: De Boëck, Raisons éducatives.
44. Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrim, J.F., & Silverman, D. (2004). Qualitative research practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
45. Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press
46. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of a new reform. Harvard Review, 57, 1-22.
47. Siedentop, D. (2002) Content knowledge for physical education, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 368-377.
48. Stake, R.E. (2000). Case studies. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435-453). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
49. Stitt-Gohdes, W.L., Lambrecht, J.J., & Redmann, D.H., (2000). The critical-incident technique in job behavior. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 25(1), 59-84.
50. Tesh R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Bristol, PA: Falmer
51. Tousignant, M., & Siedentop, D. (1983). A qualitative analysis of task structure in required secondary physical education classes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 3, 47-57.
52. Vidich, A.J., & Lyman, S.M. (2000). Qualitative methods, their history in sociology and anthropology. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 37-84). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
53. Watts, M., Alsop, S., & Gould, G. (1997). Prompting teachers' constructive reflection on: pupils' questions as critical incidents. International Journal of Science Education, 19(5), 1025-37
54. Wood, P. (1983). Sociology and the school. An interactionist viewpoint. London: Routledge, Kegan Paul.