Goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in cross-dimensional texture segregation

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 826-838

  Ghirardelli, Thomas G ^a,b   Egeth, Howard E ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ATTENTION; GOALS; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032112696     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206066     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. BACON, W. F., & EGETH, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496.
2. BACON, W. F., & EGETH, H. E. (1997). Goal-directed guidance of attention: Evidence from conjunctive visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 948-961.
3. BERGEN, J. R., & JULESZ, B. (1983). Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination. Nature, 303, 696-698.
4. BRAVO, M. J., & BLAKE, R. (1990). Preattentive vision and perceptual groups. Perception, 19, 515-522.
5. BROADBENT, D. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford: Pergamon.
6. BUNDESEN, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
7. CALLAGHAN, T. C. (1989). Interference and dominance in texture segregation: Hue, geometric form, and line orientation. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 299-311.
8. CALLAGHAN, T. C., LASAGA, M. I., & GARNER, W. R. (1986). Visual texture segregation based on orientation and hue. Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 32-38.
9. EGETH, H. E., & YANTIS, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269-297.
10. ENNS, J. T., & RENSINK, R. A. (1990a). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science, 247, 721-723.
11. ENNS, J. T., & RENSINK, R. A. (1990b). Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings. Psychological Review, 98, 335-351.
12. FOLK, C. L., & ANNETT, S. (1994). Do locally defined feature discontinuities capture attention? Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 277-287.
13. FOLK, C. L., & REMINGTON, R. W. (1996). When knowledge does not help: Limitations on the flexibility of attentional control. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 271-296). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14. FOLK, C. L., & REMINGTON, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1-12.
15. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
16. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 682-685.
17. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & WRIGHT, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 317-329.
18. GARNER, W. R. (1983). Asymmetric interactions of stimulus dimensions in perceptual information processing. In T. J. Tighe & B. E. Shepp (Eds.), Perception, cognition, and development: Interactional analyses (pp. 1-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. GHIRARDELLI, T. G. (1996). Pre-attentive and attentive processing in cross-dimensional texture segregation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.
20. GOTTWALD, R. L., & GARNER, W. R. (1972). Effects of focusing strategy on speeded classification with grouping, filtering, and condensation tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 179-182.
21. GROSSBERG, S., MINGOLLA, E., & ROSS, W. D. (1994). A neural theory of attentive visual search: Interactions of boundary, surface, spatial, and object representations. Psychological Review, 101, 470-489.
22. HE, Z. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1992). Surface versus features in visual search. Nature, 359, 231-233.
23. HILLSTROM, A. P., & YANTIS, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 399-411.
24. HOFFMAN, J. E. (1979). A two-stage model of visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 319-327.
25. JAMES, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
26. JONIDES, J., & YANTIS, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
27. JOSEPH, J. S., & OPTICAN, L. M. (1996). Involuntary attentional shifts due to orientation differences. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 651-665.
28. KAPTEIN, N. A., THEEUWES, J., & VAN DER HEIJDEN, A. H. C. (1995). Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color-defined subset of elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 1053-1069.
29. KOCH, C., & ULLMAN, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219-227.
30. NAVON, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
31. NEISSER, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
32. PAQUET, L. (1992). Global and local processing in nonattended objects: A failure to induce local processing dominance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 512-529.
33. PAQUET, L., & MERIKLE, P. M. (1988). Global precedence in attended and nonattended objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 89-100.
34. PASHLER, H. (1988). Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 307-318.
35. POISSON, M. E., & WILKINSON, F. (1992). Distractor ratio and grouping processes in visual conjunction search. Perception, 21, 21-38.
36. POSNER, M. I., SNYDER, C. R. R., & DAVIDSON, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
37. SAGI, D., & JULESZ, B. (1985a). Detection versus discrimination of visual orientation. Perception, 13, 619-628.
38. SAGI, D., & JULESZ, B. (1985b). "Where" and "what" in vision. Science, 228, 1217-1219.
39. THEEUWES, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184-193.
40. THEEUWES, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
41. THEEUWES, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 799-806.
42. TODD, S., & KRAMER, A. F. (1994). Attentional misguidance in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 198-210.
43. TREISMAN, A., & SATO, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 459-478.
44. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
45. YANTIS, S. (1993a). Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 156-161.
46. YANTIS, S. (1993b). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 676-681.
47. YANTIS, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 45-76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48. YANTIS, S., & EGETH, H. E. (1994). Visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture [Abstract]. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 35, 1619.
49. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601-621.