Perceptual grouping in space and time: Evidence from the Ternus display

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 87-99

  Kramer, Peter ^a   Yantis, Steven ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030636244     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206851     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. ANSTIS, S., & RAMACHANDRAN, V. S. (1986). Entrained path deflection in apparent motion. Vision Research, 26, 1731-1739.
2. BOSINELLI, M., CANESTRARI, R., & MINGUZZI, G. F. (1960). Beitrag zum Problem der gekreuzten und ungekreuzten Bewegungen [Contribution to the solution of the problem of crossed and uncrossed movements]. Psychologische Beiträge, 5, 8-22.
3. BOWLING, A., LOVEGROVE, W., & MAPPERSON, B. (1979). The effect of spatial frequency and contrast on visual persistence. Perception, 8, 529-539.
4. BREITMEYER, B. G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. BREITMEYER, B. G., MAY, J. G., & WILLIAMS, M. C. (1988). Spatial frequency and contrast effects on percepts of bistable stroboscopic motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 525-531.
6. BREITMEYER, B. G., & RITTER, A. (1986a). The role of visual pattern persistence in bistable stroboscopic motion. Vision Research, 26, 1801-1806.
7. BREITMEYER, B. G., & RITTER, A. (1986b). Visual persistence and the effect of eccentric viewing, element size, and frame duration on bistable stroboscopic motion percepts. Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 275-280.
8. BURT, P., & SPERLING, G. (1981). Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. Psychological Review, 88, 171-195.
9. CASCO, C. (1990). The relationship between visual persistence and event perception in bistable motion display. Perception, 19, 437-445.
10. CHANG, J. J., & JULESZ, B. (1985). Cooperative and non-cooperative processes of apparent movement of random-dot cinematograms. Spatial Vision, 1, 39-45.
11. COLTHEART, M. (1980). Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 183-228.
12. CORNSWEET, T. N. (1970). Visual perception. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
13. DAWSON, M. R. W. (1987). Moving contexts do affect the perceived direction of apparent motion in motion competition displays. Vision Research, 21, 799-809.
14. DAWSON, M. R. W. (1991). The how and why of what went where in apparent motion: Modeling solutions to the motion correspondence problem. Psychological Review, 98, 569-603.
15. DAWSON, M. R. W., & WRIGHT, R. D. (1994). Simultaneity in the Ternus configuration: Psychophysical data and a computer model. Vision Research, 34, 397-407.
16. GREEN, M. (1986). What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion? Vision Research, 26, 599-607.
17. HAGENZIEKER, M. P., & VAN DER HEIJDEN, A. H. C. (1990). Time courses in visual-information processing: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Research, 52, 5-12.
18. HAGENZIEKER, M. P., VAN DER HEIJDEN, A. H. C., & HAGENAAR, R. (1990). Time courses in visual-information processing: Some empirical evidence for inhibition. Psychological Research, 52, 13-21.
19. KELLMAN, P. J., & SHIPLEY, T. F. (1992). Perceiving objects across gaps in space and time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 193-199.
20. KOFFKA, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
21. KOLERS, P. A. (1972). Aspects of motion perception. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
22. KOLERS, P. A., & POMERANTZ, J. R. (1971). Figurai change in apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 99-108.
23. KRAMER, P., & RUDD, M. E. (1995, November). Form correspondence in the Ternus apparent motion effect. Poster presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
24. MACK, A., KLEIN, L., HILL, J., & PALUMBO, D. (1989). Apparent motion: Evidence of the influence of shape, slant, and size on the correspondence process. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 201-206.
25. MEYER, G. E., & MAGUIRE, W. M. (1977). Spatial frequency and the mediation of short-term visual storage. Science, 198, 524-525.
26. METZGER, W. (1934). Beobachtungen über phänomenale Identität [Observations regarding phenomenal identity]. Psychologische Forschung, 19, 1-60.
27. NAKAYAMA, K., HE, Z. J., & SHIMOJO, S. (1995). Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision. In S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 2, pp. 1-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. NAVON, D. (1976). Irrelevance of figurai identity for resolving ambiguities in apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 130-138.
29. PALMER, S., & ROCK, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 29-55.
30. PANTLE, A. J., & PETERSIK, J. T. (1980). Effects of spatial parameters on the perceptual organization of a bistable motion display. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 307-312.
31. PANTLE, A. J., & PICCIANO, L. (1976). A multistable movement display: Evidence for two separate motion systems in human vision. Science, 193, 500-502.
32. PAPATHOMAS, T. V., GOREA, A., & JULESZ, B. (1991). Two carriers for motion perception: Color and luminance. Vision Research, 31, 1883-1892.
33. PETERSIK, J. T. (1984). The perceptual fate of letters in two kinds of apparent movement displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 146-150.
34. PETERSIK, J. T., & GRASSMUCK, J. (1981). High fundamental spatial frequencies and edges have different perceptual consequences in the "group/end-to-end" movement phenomenon. Perception, 10, 375-382.
35. PETERSIK, J. T., & PANTLE, A. (1979). Factors controlling the competing sensations produced by a bistable stroboscopic motion display. Vision Research, 19, 143-154.
36. PETERSIK, J. T., & ROSNER, A. (1990). The effects of position cues on the appearance of stimulus elements in a bistable apparent movement display. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 280-284.
37. RAMACHANDRAN, V. S., & ANSTIS, S. M. (1983). Perceptual organization in moving patterns. Nature, 304, 529-531.
38. RAMACHANDRAN, V. S., & ANSTIS, S. M. (1985). Perceptual organization in multistable apparent motion. Perception, 14, 135-143.
39. RAMACHANDRAN, V. S., & CAVANAGH, P. (1987). Motion capture anisotropy. Vision Research, 27, 97-106.
40. RAMACHANDRAN, V. S., GINSBURG, A. P., & ANSTIS, S. M. (1983). Low spatial frequencies dominate apparent motion. Perception, 12, 457-461.
41. SHECHTER, S., HOCHSTEIN, S., & HILLMAN, P. (1988). Shape similarity and distance disparity as apparent motion correspondence cues. Vision Research, 28, 1013-1021.
42. TERNUS, J. (1926). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt III: Experimentelle Untersuchungen über phänomenale Identität [Investigations concerning the study of the Gestalt: Experimental investigations of phenomenal identity]. Psychologische Forschung, 7, 81-136.
43. Abstracted and translated in W. D. Ellis (Ed.) (1939). A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 149-160). New York: Harcourt, Brace.
44. ULLMAN, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. ULLMAN, S. (1980). The effect of similarity between line segments on the correspondence strength in apparent motion. Perception, 9, 617-626.
46. VAN DER HEIJDEN, A. H. C. (1992). Selective attention in vision. London: Routledge.
47. WERKHOVEN, P., SPERLING, G., & CHUBB, C. (1993). The dimensionality of texture-defined motion: A single channel theory. Vision Research, 33, 463-485.
48. WERKHOVEN, P., SPERLING, G., & CHUBB, C. (1994). Perception of apparent motion between dissimilar gratings: Spatiotemporal properties. Vision Research, 34, 2741-2759.
49. WERTHEIMER, M. (1912). Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung [Experimental studies of the perception of motion]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 61, 161-265. Translated in part in T. Shipley (Ed.) (1961). Classics in psychology. New York: Philosophical Library.
50. WERTHEIMER, M. (1912). Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung [Experimental studies of the perception of motion]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 61, 161-265. Translated in part in T. Shipley (Ed.) (1961). Classics in psychology. New York: Philosophical Library.
51. WERTHEIMER, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II [Investigations concerning the study of the Gestalt II]. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301-350.
52. WILLIAMS, D. W., & SEKULER, R. (1984). Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions. Vision Research, 24, 55-62.
53. YANTIS, S. (1995). Perceived continuity of occluded visual objects. Psychological Science, 6, 182-186.
54. YANTIS, S., & GIBSON, B. S. (1994). Object continuity in motion perception and attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 182-204.