The learning and study strategies inventory-high school version: Issues of factorial invariance across gender and ethnicity

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 332-346

  Stevens, Tara ^a,b   Tallent Runnels, Mary K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT SPRINGFIELD   (United States)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Invariance models; Learning strategies; Study strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842536226     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013164403258455     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
2. Byrnes, J. P. (2001). Cognitive development and learning In Instructional contexts (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25, 1-27.
4. Drasgow, F. (1984). Scrutinizing psychological tests: Measurement equivalence and equivalent relations with external variables are the central issues. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 134-135.
5. Eldredge, J. L. (1990). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory - High school version (LASSI-HS). Journal of Reading, 34, 146-149.
6. Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56-83.
7. Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Foust, M. S. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 233-256.
8. Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3), 117-144.
9. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criterion for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
10. MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185-199.
11. Magliano, J. P., Trabasso, T., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). Strategic processing during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 615-629.
12. McArdle, J. J., & Cattell, R. B. (1994). Structural equation models of factorial invariance in parallel proportional profiles and oblique confactor problems. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 63-113.
13. Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (1998). Using the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory - High school version with Singaporean females: Examining psychometric properties. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 493-510.
14. Olaussen, B. S., & Braten, I. (1998). Identifying latent variables measured by the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) in Norwegian college students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 82-96.
15. Olejnik, S., & Nist, S. L. (1992). Identifying latent variables measured by the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 151-159.
16. Olivarez, A., Jr., & Tallent-Runnels, M. K. (1994). Psychometric properties of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory-High school version. Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 243-257.
17. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479-530.
18. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Weinstein, C. E., & Palmer, D. (1987). LASSI user's manual. Clearwater, FL: H&H.
21. Weinstein, C. E., & Palmer, D. (1990). LASSI-HS user's manual. Clearwater, FL: H&H.