Origins of nonword phonological errors in aphasic picture naming

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 21, Issue 2-4, 2004, Pages 159-186

  Schwartz, Myrna F ^a   Wilshire, Carolyn E ^b,e   Gagnon, Deborah A ^c   Polansky, Marcia ^d  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^d DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APHASIA; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM; BRAIN EMBOLISM; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN INFARCTION; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONDUCTION APHASIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL SENSORY APHASIA; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; ERROR; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LANGUAGE TEST; MODULATION; PHONEME; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; THEORY;

EID: 1842524125     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02643290342000519     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Pennsylvania: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, PA.
2. Basso, A., Corno, M., & Marangolo, P. (1996). Evolution of oral and written confrontation naming errors in aphasia. A retrospective study on vascular patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18, 77-87.
3. Béland, R., Caplan, D., & Nespoulous, J.-L. (1990). The role of abstract phonological representations in word production: Evidence from phonemic paraphasias. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 5, 125-164.
4. Best, W. (1995). A reverse length effect in dysphasic naming: When elephant is easier than ant. Cortex, 31, 637-652.
5. Blumstein, S. E. (1973). A phonological investigation of aphasic speech. The Hague: Mouton.
6. Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966). The "tIp of the tongue" phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 5, 325-337.
7. Bub, D., Black, S., Howell, J., & Kertesz, A. (1987). Damage to input and output buffers: What's a lexicality effect doing in a place like that? In E. Keller & M. Gopnik (Eds.), Motor and sensory processes of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
8. Buckingham, H. W. (1977). The conduction theory and neologistic jargon. Language and Speech, 20, 174-184.
9. Buckingham, H. W. (1979). Linguistic aspects of lexical retrieval disturbances in the posterior fluent aphasia. In H. Whitaker & H. A. Whitaker (Eds.), Studies in neurolinguistics (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press.
10. Buckingham, H. W. (1985). Perseveration in aphasia. In S. Newman & R. Epstein (Eds.), Current perspectives in dysphasia (pp. 113-154). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
11. Buckingham, H. W. (1987). Phonemic paraphasias and psycholinguistic production models for neologistic jargon. Aphasiology, 1, 381-400.
12. Buckingham, H. W. (1992). Phonological production deficits in conduction aphasia. In S. E. Kohn (Ed.), Conduction aphasia. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
13. Buckingham, H.W., & Kertesz, A. (1976). Neologistic jargon aphasia. In R. Hoops & Y. Lebrun (Eds.), Neurolinguistics. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
14. Burns, M. S., & Canter, G. J. (1977). Phonemic behavior of aphasic patients with posterior cerebral lesions. Brain and Language, 4, 492-507.
15. Butterworth, B. (1979). Hesitation and the production of verbal paraphasias and neologisms in jargon aphasia. Brain and Language, 8, 133-161.
16. Caplan, D., Vanier, M., & Baker, C. (1986). A case study of reproduction conduction aphasia. I: Word production. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 99-128.
17. Christman, S. H. (1994). Target-related neologism formation in jargonaphasia. Brain and Language, 46, 109-128.
18. Cohen, L., Verstichel, P., & Dehaene, S. (1997). Neologistic jargon sparing numbers: A category-specific phonological impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 1029-1061.
19. Cuetos, F., Aguado, G., & Caramazza, A. (2000). Dissociation of semantic and phonological errors in naming. Brain and Language, 75, 451-460
20. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
21. Dell, G. S. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Test of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 124-142.
22. Dell, G. S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 313-349.
23. Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K., & Svec, W. R. (1997). Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review, 104, 123-144.
24. Dell, G. S., Juliano, C., & Govindjee, A. (1993). Structure and content in language production: A theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors. Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 149-195.
25. Dell, G. S., Lawler, E. N., Harris, H. D., & Gordon, J. K. (2004). Models of errors of omission in aphasic naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 125-145.
26. Dell, G. S., & O'Seaghda, P. G. (1991). Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: A comment on Levelt et al. Psychological Review, 98, 604-614.
27. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997b). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801-838.
28. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (2000). The role of computational models in neuropsychological investigations of language: Reply to Ruml and Caramazza (2000). Psychological Review, 107, 635-645.
29. Ellis, A. W. (1985). The production of spoken words: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 2). Hove, UK: Lawarence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
30. Ellis, A. W., Miller, D., & Sin, G. (1983). Wernicke's aphasia and normal language processing: A case study in cognitive neuropsychology. Cognition, 15, 111-144.
31. Foygel, D., & Dell, G. S. (2000). Models of impaired lexical access in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 182-216.
32. Francis, W., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
33. Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27-52.
34. Gagnon, D. A., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Dell, G. S., & Saffran, E. M. (1997). The origins of formal paraphasias in aphasics picture naming. Brain and Language, 59, 450-472.
35. Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press.
36. Garrett, M. F. (1982). Production of speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions. London: Academic Press.
37. Goldmann, R. E., Schwartz, M. F., &Wilshire, C. E. (2001). The influence of phonological context on the sound errors of a speaker with Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language, 78, 279-307.
38. Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2001). What makes a good neighbor? Evidence from malapropisms. Brain and Language, 79, 141-143.
39. Goldrick, M., Rapp, B., & Smolensky, P. (1999). Lexical and postlexical processes in spoken word production. Brain and Language, 69, 367-370.
40. Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Feibiger.
41. Gordon, J. K. (2002). Phonological neighborhood effects in aphasic speech errors: Spontaneous and structured contexts. Brain and Language, 82, 113-145.
42. Gordon, J. K., & Dell, G. S. (2003). Learning to divide the labor: An account of deficits in light and heavy verb production. Cognitive Science, 27, 140.
43. Harley, T. A. (1984). A critique of top-down independent levels models of speech production: Evidence from non-phrase-internal errors. Cognitive Science, 8, 191-219.
44. Harley, T. A. (1984). A critique of top-down independent levels models of speech production: Evidence from non-phrase-internal errors. Cognitive Science, 8, 191-219.
45. Harley, T. A., & Bown, H. E. (1998). What causes a tip-of-the-tongue state? Evidence for lexical neighbourhood effects in speech production. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 151-174.
46. Houghton, G. (1990). The problem of serial order: A neural network model of sequence learning and recall. In R. Dale, C. Mellish, & M. Zock (Eds.), Current research in natural language generation. London: Academic Press.
47. Jescheniak, J.D., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 824-843.
48. Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., &Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
49. Kertesz, A., & Benson, D. F. (1970). Neologistic jargon: A clinicopathological study. Cortex, 6, 362-386.
50. Kohn, S. E. (1989). The nature of the phonemic string deficit in conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 3, 209-239.
51. Kohn, S. E., & Smith, K. L. (1990). Between-word speech errors in conduction aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 133-156.
52. Kohn, S. E., & Smith, K. L. (1994). Distinctions between two phonological output deficits. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 75-95.
53. Kohn, S. E., & Smith, K. L. (1995). Serial effects in phonemic planning during word production. Aphasiology, 9, 209-222.
54. Landauer, T. K., & Streeter, L. A. (1973). Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 119-131.
55. Lecours, A. R. (1982). On neologisms. In J. Mehler, E. C. T. Walker, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Perspectives on mental representation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
56. Lecours, A. R., Deloche, G., & Lhermitte, F. (1973). Paraphasies phonémiques: Description et simulation sur ordinateur. In Colloquies-IRIA - Informatique Medical. Rocquencourt, France: Institut de Recherche d'Informatique et d'Automatique.
57. Lecours, A. R., & Lhermitte, F. (1969). Phonemic paraphasias: Linguistic structures and tentative hypotheses. Cortex, 5, 193-228.
58. Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 122.
59. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 175.
60. MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action. New York: Springer Verlag.
61. Martin, N., Dell, G. S., Saffran, E. M., & Schwartz, M. F. (1994). Origins of paraphasias in deep dysphasia: Testing the consequences of a decay impairment to an interactive spreading activation model of lexical retrieval. Brain and Language, 47, 609-660.
62. Martin, N., & Saffran, E. (1992). A computational account of deep dysphasia: Evidence from a single case study. Brain and Language, 43, 240-274.
63. Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Dell, G. S. (1996). Recovery in deep dysphasia: Evidence for a relationship between auditory-verbal STM capacity and lexical errors in repetition. Brain and Language, 52, 83-113.
64. Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1146-1160.
65. Miller, D., & Ellis, A. (1987). Speech and writing errors in "nEologistic jargonaphasia": A lexical activation hypothesis. In M. Coltheart, G. Sartori, & K. Job (Eds.), The cognitive neuropsychology of language. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
66. Nespoulous, J. L., Joanette, Y., Ska, B., Caplan, J. D., & Lecours, A. R. (1987). Production deficits in Brocas and conduction aphasia: Repetition versus reading. In E. Keller & M. Gopnik (Eds.), Motor and sensory processes of language. Neuropsychology and neurolinguistics (pp. 5381). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
67. Newsome, M. R., & Martin, R. C. (2000). Lexical versus segmental deficits in phonological retrieval: Implications for models of naming. Poster presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, November, 2000, New Orleans, LA, USA.
68. Nickels, L. (1995). Getting it right? Using aphasic naming errors to evaluate theoretical models of spoken word production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 13-45.
69. Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (1995). Phonological errors in aphasic naming: Comprehension, monitoring and lexicality. Cortex, 31, 209-237.
70. Oldfield, R. C., & Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 273-281.
71. Pate, D. S., Saffran, E. M., & Martin, N. (1987). Specifying the nature of the production impairment in a conduction aphasic: A case study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 43-84.
72. Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460-503.
73. Roach, A., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Grewal, R. S., & Brecher, A. (1996). The Philadelphia Naming Test: Scoring and rationale. Clinical Aphasiology, 24, 121-133.
74. Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249-284.
75. Romani, C., & Calabrese, A. (1998). Syllabic constraints in the phonological errors of an aphasic patient. Brain and Language, 64, 83-121.
76. Ruml, W., & Caramazza, A. (2000). An evaluation of a computational model of lexical access: Comment on Dell et al. (1997). Psychological Review, 107, 609-634.
77. Ruml, W., Caramazza, A., Shelton, J. R., & Chialant, D. (2000). Testing assumptions in computational theories of aphasia. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 217-248.
78. Schwartz, M. F., & Brecher, A. (2000). A model-driven analysis of severity, response characteristics, and partial recovery in aphasics' picture naming. Brain and Language, 73, 6291.
79. Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., Bloch, D. E., & Dell, G. S. (1994). Disordered speech production in aphasic and normal speakers. Brain and Language, 47, 5288.
80. Sevald, C. A., & Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cueing effect in speech production. Cognition, 53, 91-127.
81. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1979). Speech errors as evidence for a serial ordering mechanism in sentence production. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
82. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1983). Sublexical units and suprasegmental structure in speech production planning. In P. F. MacNeilage (Ed.), The production of speech. New York: Springer-Verlag.
83. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1987). The role of word onset consonants in speech production planning: New evidence from speech error patterns. In E. Keller & M. Gopnik (Eds.), Motor and sensory processes of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
84. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1992). The role of word structure in segmental serial ordering. Cognition, 42, 213-259.
85. Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive activation model of language production. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
86. Stemberger, J. P. (1990). Wordshape errors in language production. Cognition, 35, 123-157
87. Vitevitch, M. S. (1997). The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. Language and Speech, 40, 211-228.
88. Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 735-747.
89. Vitevitch, M. S., & Sommers, M. (1999). Neighborhood density, the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon and aging. Research on Spoken Language Processing: Progress Report No. 23. Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University.
90. Vousden, J. I., Brown, G. D. A., & Harley, T. A. (2000). Serial control of phonology in speech production: A hierarchical model. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 101-175.
91. Wheeler, D. W., & Touretzky, D. S. (1997). A parallel licensing model of normal slips and phonemic paraphasias. Brain and Language, 59, 147-201.
92. Wilshire, C. E. (2002). Where do aphasic phonological errors come from? Evidence from phoneme movement errors in picture naming. Aphasiology, 16, 169-197.
93. Wilshire, C. E., & McCarthy, R. A. (1996). Experimental investigations of an impairment in phonological encoding. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 1059-1098.
94. Wing, A. M., & Baddeley, A. (1980). Spelling errors in handwriting: A corpus and a distributional analysis. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. New York: Academic Press.
95. Zipf, G. K. (1965). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.