Towards a regional approach to cell mechanics

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 160-166

  Heidemann, Steven R ^a   Wirtz, Denis ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL ACTIVITY; CELL CULTURE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL HETEROGENEITY; CELL KINETICS; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL MOTILITY; CELL SHAPE; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL SURFACE; CELL ULTRASTRUCTURE; CYTOPLASM; CYTOSKELETON; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; VISCOELASTICITY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 1842504023     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Xu J., et al. Mechanical properties of actin filament networks depend on preparation, polymerization conditions, and storage of actin monomers. Biophys. J. 74:1998;2731-2740.
2. McGrath J.L., et al. The mechanics of F-actin microenvironments depend on the chemistry of probing surfaces. Biophys. J. 79:2000;3258-3266.
3. Tang J.X., et al. Thiol oxidation of actin produces dimers that enhance the elasticity of the F-actin network. Biophys. J. 76:1999;2208-2215.
4. Xu J., et al. Strain hardening of actin filament networks. Regulation by the dynamic cross-linking protein alpha-actinin. J. Biol. Chem. 275:2000;35886-35892.
5. Sheetz M.P. Cell control by membrane-cytoskeleton adhesion. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2:2001;392-396.
6. Dai J., et al. Membrane tension in swelling and shrinking molluscan neurons. J. Neurosci. 18:1998;6681-6692.
7. Dai J., Sheetz M.P. Regulation of endocytosis, exocytosis, and shape by membrane tension. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 60:1995;567-571.
8. Hochmuth R.M., Marcus W.D. Membrane tethers formed from blood cells with available area and determination of their adhesion energy. Biophys. J. 82:2002;2964-2969.
9. Raucher D., Sheetz M.P. Characteristics of a membrane reservoir buffering membrane tension. Biophys. J. 77:1999;1992-2002.
10. Mohandas N., Evans E. Mechanical properties of the red cell membrane in relation to molecular structure and genetic defects. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 23:1994;787-818.
11. Hochmuth R.M. Micropipette aspiration of living cells. J. Biomech. 33:2000;15-22.
12. Ting-Beall H.P., et al. Volume and osmotic properties of human neutrophils. Blood. 81:1993;2774-2780.
13. Drury J.L., Dembo M. Aspiration of human neutrophils: effects of shear thinning and cortical dissipation. Biophys. J. 81:2001;3166-3177.
14. Herant M., et al. The mechanics of neutrophils: synthetic modeling of three experiments. Biophys. J. 84:2003;3389-3413.
15. Reuzeau C., et al. Discrete and reversible vacuole-like dilations induced by osmomechanical perturbation of neurons. J. Membr. Biol. 145:1995;33-47.
16. Morris C.E., et al. The invagination of excess surface area by shrinking neurons. Biophys. J. 85:2003;223-235.
17. Morris C.E., Homann U. Cell surface area regulation and membrane tension. J. Membr. Biol. 179:2001;79-102.
18. Koffer A., et al. Vacuole formation in mast cells responding to osmotic stress and to F-actin disassembly. Cell Biol. Int. 26:2002;885-892.
19. Baumgart T., et al. Imaging coexisting fluid domains in biomembrane models coupling curvature and line tension. Nature. 425:2003;821-824.
20. Caille N., et al. Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. J. Biomech. 35:2002;177-187.
21. Heidemann S.R., et al. Direct observations of the mechanical behaviors of the cytoskeleton in living fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 145:1999;109-122.
22. Maniotis A.J., et al. Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94:1997;849-854.
23. Thoumine O., Ott A. Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. J. Cell Sci. 110:1997;2109-2116.
24. Tseng, Y. et al. Micro-organization and visco-elasticity of the interphase nucleus revealed by particle nanotracking. J. Cell Sci. (in press).
25. Beil M., et al. Sphingosylphosphorylcholine regulates keratin network architecture and visco-elastic properties of human cancer cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:2003;803-811.
26. Pollard T.D., Borisy G.G. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell. 112:2003;453-465.
27. Weaver A.M., et al. Integration of signals to the Arp2/3 complex. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15:2003;23-30.
28. Carlier M.F., et al. Actin-based motility: from molecules to movement. Bioessays. 25:2003;336-345.
29. Nakamura F., et al. Comparison of filamin A-induced cross-linking and Arp2/3 complex-mediated branching on the mechanics of actin filaments. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2002;9148-9154.
30. Tseng Y., et al. The bimodal role of filamin in controlling the architecture and mechanics of F-actin networks. J. Biol. Chem. 279:2004;1819-1826.
31. Choquet D., et al. Extracellular matrix rigidity causes strengthening of integrin-cytoskeleton linkages. Cell. 88:1997;39-48.
32. Fung Y.C. Elasticity of soft tissues in simple elongation. Am. J. Physiol. 213:1967;1532-1544.
33. Hoh J.H., Schoenenberger C.A. Surface morphology and mechanical properties of MDCK monolayers by atomic force microscopy. J. Cell Sci. 107:1994;1105-1114.
34. Putman C.A.J., et al. Viscoelasticity of living cells allows high resolution imaging by tapping mode atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 67:1994;1749-1753.
35. Wang N., et al. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science. 260:1993;1124-1127.
36. Hiramoto Y. Mechanical properties of sea urchin eggs. Exp. Cell Res. 32:1963;59-75.
37. Volokh K.Y., et al. Cell cytoskeleton and tensegrity. Biorheology. 39:2002;63-67.
38. Wang N., et al. Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:2001;7765-7770.
39. Canadas P., et al. A cellular tensegrity model to analyse the structural viscoelasticity of the cytoskeleton. J. Theor. Biol. 218:2002;155-173.
40. Alcaraz J., et al. Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 84:2003;2071-2079.
41. Fabry B., et al. Time scale and other invariants of integrative behavior in living cells. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 68:2003;041914.
42. Frey-Wyssling A. Submicroscopic Morphology of Protoplasm and Its Derivatives. 1948;Elsevier.
43. Sato M., et al. Dependence of the mechanical properties of actin/actinin gels on deformation rate. Nature. 325:1987;828-830.
44. Svitkina T.M., et al. Mechanism of filopodia initiation by reorganization of a dendritic network. J. Cell Biol. 160:2003;409-421.
45. Vignjevic D., et al. Formation of filopodia-like bundles in vitro from a dendritic network. J. Cell Biol. 160:2003;951-962.
46. Matzke R., et al. Direct, high-resolution measurement of furrow stiffening during division of adherent cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:2001;607-610.
47. Yamada S., et al. Mechanics of living cells measured by laser tracking microrheology. Biophys. J. 78:2000;1736-1747.
48. Luby-Phelps K. Cytoarchitecture and physical properties of cytoplasm: volume, viscosity, diffusion, intracellular surface area. Int. Rev. Cytol. 192:2000;189-221.
49. Radmacher M. Measuring the elastic properties of living cells by the atomic force microscope. Methods Cell Biol. 68:2002;67-90.
50. Bausch A.R., et al. Measurement of local viscoelasticity and forces in living cells by magnetic tweezers. Biophys. J. 76:1999;573-579.
51. Merkel R., et al. A micromechanic study of cell polarity and plasma membrane cell body coupling in Dictyostelium. Biophys. J. 79:2000;707-719.
52. Tseng Y., et al. Micromechanical mapping of live cells by multiple-particle-tracking microrheology. Biophys. J. 83:2002;3162-3176.
53. Kole, T.P. et al. Rho kinase regulates the intracellular micromechanical response of adherent cells to Rho activation. Mol. Biol. Cell (in press).
54. Ingber D.E. Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J. Cell Sci. 116:2003;1157-1173.
55. Ingber D.E. Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 59:1997;575-599.
56. Hu S., et al. Intracellular stress tomography reveals stress focusing and structural anisotropy in cytoskeleton of living cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 285:2003;C1082-C1090.
57. Suter D.M., et al. The Ig superfamily cell adhesion molecule, ApCAM, mediates growth cone steering by substrate-cytoskeletal coupling. J. Cell Biol. 140:1998;227-240.
58. Harris A.K. Locomotion of tissue culture cells considered in relation to ameboid locomotion. Int. Rev. Cytol. 150:1994;35-68.
59. Ragsdale G.K., et al. Viscoelastic response of fibroblasts to tension transmitted through adherens junctions. Biophys. J. 73:1997;2798-2808.
60. Schaefer A.W., et al. Filopodia and actin arcs guide the assembly and transport of two populations of microtubules with unique dynamic parameters in neuronal growth cones. J. Cell Biol. 158:2002;139-152.
61. Gil O.D., et al. Ankyrin binding mediates L1CAM interactions with static components of the cytoskeleton and inhibits retrograde movement of L1CAM on the cell surface. J. Cell Biol. 162:2003;719-730.
62. Ridley A.J., et al. Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science. 302:2003;1704-1709.
63. Seifritz W. The structure of protoplasm. 1942;Iowa State College Press.
64. Taylor D.L., Condeelis J.S. Cytoplasmic structure and contractility in amoeboid cells. Int. Rev. Cytol. 56:1979;57-144.