Combining individuality and relatedness: Representations of the person among the Anglican clergy

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 113-132

  Vignoles, Vivian L ^a   Chryssochoou, Xenia ^a   Breakwell, Glynis M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842485930     PISSN: 01446665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/014466604322916015     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Bauer, M. W., & Aarts, B. (2000). Corpus construction: A principle for qualitative data collection. In M. W. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound (pp. 19-37). London: Sage.
2. Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
3. Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791-808.
4. Dumont, L. (1986). Essays on individualism: Modern ideology in anthropological perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Durkheim, E. (1915). The elementary forms of the religious life. (J. W. Swain, Trans.). London: Allen and Unwin. (Original work published 1912)
6. Durkheim, E. (1969). Individualism and the intellectuals. (S. Lukes, Trans.). Political Studies, 17, 14-30. (Original work published 1898)
7. Elliot, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215-229.
8. Farr, R. M. (1991). Individualism as a collective representation. In V. Aebischer, J. P. Deconchy, & E. M. Lipiansky (Eds.), Idéologies et représentations sociales (pp. 129-143). Paris: Del Val.
9. Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2., pp. 915-981). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
10. Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and method, (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). London: Sheed and Ward. (Original work published 1960)
11. Gao G. (1996). Self and OTHER: A Chinese perspective on interpersonal relationships. In W. B. Gudykunst, S. Ting-Toomey, & T. Nishida (Eds.), Communication in personal relationships across cultures (pp. 81-101). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
12. Gardner, W. L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). "I" value freedom, but "we" value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10, 321-326.
13. Geertz, C. (1975). On the nature of anthropological understanding. American Scientist, 63, 47-53.
14. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
15. Golsworthy, R., & Coyle, A. (1999). Spiritual beliefs and the search for meaning among older adults following partner loss. Mortality, 4, 21-40.
16. Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishlda, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 510-543.
17. Guisinger, S., & Blatt, S. J. (1994). Individuality and relatedness: Evolution of a fundamental dialectic. American Psychologist, 49, 104-111.
18. Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1998). Moving cultures: The perilous problems of cultural dichotomies in a globalizing society. American Psychologist, 53, 1111-1120.
19. Ho, D. Y. F. (1995). Selfhood and identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Contrasts with the West. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 25, 115-139.
20. Holton, G. (1978). The scientific imagination: Case studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Hong, Y. Y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. Y., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic construstivist approach to culture and cogniton. American Psychologist, 55, 709-720.
22. Jarman, M., Smith, J., & Walsh, S. (1997). The psychological battle for control: A qualitative study of healthcare professionals' understandings of the treatment of anorexia nervosa. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 137-152.
23. Kâgitçibasi, Ç. (1994). A critical appraisal of individualism and collectivism: Toward a new formulation. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, Ç. Kâgitçibasi, S. C., Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 52-65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Kant, I. (1956). The moral law: Kant's groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. (H. J. Paton, Trans.). London: Hutchinson. (Original work published 1785)
25. Kim, U. (1994). Individualism and collectivism: conceptual clarification and elaboration: In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, Ç. Kâgitçibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 19-40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Kim, U., & Berry, J. W. (Eds.) (1993). Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Lukes, S. (1973). Individualism. Oxford: Blackwell.
28. Lynch, C. (2001). Individualism and Christianity. American Psychologist, 56, 1176.
29. Marková, I. (1997). The individual and the community: A post-Communist perspective. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 3-17.
30. Marková, I. (2000). Amédée or how to get rid of it: Social representations from a dialogical perspective. Culture and Psychology, 6, 419-460.
31. Marková, L., Moodie, E., Farr, R. M., Drozda-Senkowska, E., Erös, F., Plichtová, J., Gervais, M. C., Hoffmannová, J., & Mullerová O. (1998). Social representations of the individual: A post-Communist perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 797-829.
32. Markowe, L. A. (1996). Redefining the self. Cambridge: Polity Press.
33. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
34. Matsumoto, D. (1999). Culture and self: An empirical assessment of Markus and Kitamaya's theory of independent and interdependent self-construals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 289-310.
35. Mauss, M. (1985). A category of the human mind: The notion of person; the notion of self. (W. D. Halls, Trans.). In M. Carrithers, S. Collins, & S. Lukes (Eds.), The category of the person (pp. 1-25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1938)
36. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure (1968 enlarged ed). New York: Free Press.
37. Moscovici, S. (2001). Why a theory of social representations? In K. Deaux & G. Philogene (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 8-35). Oxford: Blackwell.
38. Moscovici, S., & Vignaux, G. (2000). The concept of themata. In S. Moscovici & G. Duveen (Ed. and Trans.), Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press. (Original work published 1994)
39. Nedelmann, B. (1991). Individualization, exaggeration and paralysation: Simmel's three problems of culture. Theory, Culture and Society, 8, 169-193.
40. Newman, L. S. (1993). How individuals interpret behavior: Idiocentrism and spontaneous trait inference. Social Cognition, 11, 243-269.
41. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
42. Potter, J., & Litton, I. (1985). Some problems underlying the theory of social representations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 81-90.
43. Reicher, S. (1994). Particular methods and general assumptions. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 4, 299-303.
44. Religious Trends (No. 2). (2000). London: Christian Research.
45. Sampson, E. E. (2000). Reinterpreting individualism and collectivism: Their religious roots and monologic versus dialogic person-other relationship. American Psychologist, 55, 1425-1432.
46. Schools in England. (2001). London: HMSO.
47. Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (Eds.) (2001). Individual self, relational self, collective self. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
48. Shweder, R. A., & Bourne, E. J. (1984). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In R. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 158-199). New York: Cambridge University Press.
49. Smith, J. A. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 11, 261-271.
50. Smith, J. A. (1999). Towards a relational self: Social engagement during pregnancy and psychological preparation for motherhood. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 409-426.
51. Smith, J. A., Jarman, M., & Osborn, M. (1999). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In M. Murray & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods (pp. 218-240). London: Sage.
52. Speller, G., Lyons, E., & Twigger-Ross, C. (1999, September). Semi-detached bliss? A study of cultural transition as a traditional mining community is relocated. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society Social Psychology Section, Lancaster University, UK.
53. Spiro, M. E. (1993). Is the Western conception of the self "peculiar" within the contest of the world cultures? Ethos, 21, 107-153.
54. Stiles, W. B. (1993). Quality control in qualitative research. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 593-618.
55. Takano, Y., & Osaka, E. (1999). An unsupported common view: Comparing Japan and the U.S. on individualism/collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 311-341.
56. Towler, R., & Coxon, A. P. M. (1979). The fate of the Anglican clergy: A sociological study. London: Macmillan.
57. Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
58. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
59. Triandis, H. C., Chan, D. K. S., Bhawuk, D. P. S., Iwao, S., & Sinha, J. B. P. (1995). Multimethod probes of allocentrism and idiocentrism. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 461-480.
60. Troeltsch, E. (1931). The social teaching of the Christian churches. (O. Wyon, Trans.). London: Allen and Unwin. (Original work published 1911)
61. Vignoles, V. L. (2000). Identity, culture and the distinctiveness principle. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
62. Vignoles, V. L., Chryssochochoou, X., & Breakwell, G. M. (2000). The distinctiveness principle: Identity, meaning, and the bounds of cultural relativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 337-354.
63. Vignoles, V. L., Chryssochochoou, X., & Breakwell, G. M. (2002). Sources of distinctiveness: Position, difference and separateness in the identities of Anglican parish priests. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 761-780.
64. Weber, M. (1930). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. (T. Parsons, Trans.). London: Unwin University Books. (Original work published 1905)
65. Yardley, L. (2000). Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology and Health, 15, 215-228.