Prediction of functional sites by analysis of sequence and structure conservation

Protein Science

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 884-892

  Panchenko, Anna R ^a   Kondrashov, Fyodor ^b   Bryant, Stephen ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolutionary conservation; Prediction of functional residues; Protein domains

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; EVOLUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 1842454912     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.03465504     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aloy, P., Querol, E., Aviles, F.X., and Sternberg, M.J. 2001. Automated structure-based prediction of functional sites in proteins: Applications to assessing the validity of inheriting protein function from homology in genome annotation and to protein docking. J. Mol. Biol. 311: 395-408.
2. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., and Lipman, D.J. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402.
3. Andrade, M.A., Casari, G., Sander, C., and Valencia, A. 1997. Classification of protein families and detection of the determinant residues with an improved self-organizing map. Biol. Cybern. 76: 441-450.
4. Bartlett, G.J., Porter, C.T., Borkakoti, N., and Thomton, J.M. 2002. Analysis of catalytic residues in enzyme active sites. J. Mol. Biol. 324: 105-121.
5. Casari, G., Sander, C., and Valencia, A. 1995. A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2: 171-178.
6. Chambers, J.M. 1998. Programming with data. A guide to the S language. Springer Verlag, New York.
7. del Sol Mesa, A., Pazos, F., and Valencia, A. 2003. Automatic methods for predicting functionally important residues. J. Mol. Biol. 326: 1289-1302.
8. Devos, D. and Valencia, A. 2000. Practical limits of function prediction. Proteins 41: 98-107.
9. Elcock, A.H, 2001. Prediction of functionally important residues based solely on the computed energetics of protein structure. J. Mol. Biol. 312: 885-896.
10. Felsenstein, J. 1989. PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package. Cladistics 5: 164-166.
11. Gribskov, M. and Robinson, N.L. 1996. Use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate sequence matching. Comput. Chem. 20: 25-33.
12. Hannenhalli, S.S. and Russell, R.B. 2000. Analysis and prediction of functional sub-types from protein sequence alignments. J. Mol. Biol. 303: 61-76.
13. Hegyi, H. and Gerstein, M. 1999. The relationship between protein structure and function: A comprehensive survey with application to the yeast genome. J. Mol. Biol. 288: 147-164.
14. Jones, D.T., Taylor, W.R., and Thornton, J.M. 1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8: 275-282.
15. Jones, S. and Thomton, J.M. 1997. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 272: 133-143.
16. Kabsch, W. and Sander, C. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 2577-2637.
17. Landgraf, R., Xenarios, I., and Eisenberg, D. 2001. Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 307: 1487-1502.
18. Li, L., Shakhnovich, E.I., and Mirny, L.A. 2003. Amino acids determining enzyme-substrate specificity in prokaryotic and eukaryotic protein kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 4463-4468.
19. Lichtarge, O. and Sowa, M.E. 2002. Evolutionary predictions of binding surfaces and interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 21-27.
20. Lichtarge, O., Boume, H.R., and Cohen, F.E. 1996. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 257: 342-358.
21. Luscombe, N.M. and Thornton, J.M. 2002. Protein-DNA interactions: Amino acid conservation and the effects of mutations on binding specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 320: 991-1009.
22. Madabushi, S., Yao, H., Marsh, M., Kristensen, D.M., Philippi, A., Sowa, M.E., and Lichtarge, O. 2002. Structural clusters of evolutionary trace residues are statistically significant and common in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 316: 139-154.
23. Marchler-Bauer, A., Panchenko, A., Shoemaker, B., Thiessen, P., Geer, L., and Bryant, S. 2002. CDD: A database of conserved domain alignments with links to domain three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 281-283.
24. Miller, S., Janin, J., Lesk, A.M., and Chothia, C. 1987. Interior and surface of monomeric proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 196: 641-656.
25. Nooren, I.M. and Thornton, J.M. 2003. Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 325: 991-1018.
26. Panchenko, A.R. and Bryant, S.H. 2002. A comparison of position-specific score matrices based on sequence and structure alignments. Protein Sci. 11: 361-370.
27. Saitou, N. and Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4. 406-425.
28. Schaffer, A.A., Aravind, L., Madden, T.L., Shavirin, S., Spouge, J.L., Wolf, Y.I., Koonin, E.V., and Altschul, S.F. 2001. Improving the accuracy of PSI-BLAST protein database searches with composition-based statistics and other refinements. Nucleic Acids Res. 29: 2994-3005.
29. Sjolander, K. 1998. Phylogenetic inference in protein superfamilies: Analysis of SH2 domains. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 6: 165-174.
30. Teichmann, S.A., Murzin, A.G., and Chothia, C. 2001. Determination of protein function, evolution, and interactions by structural genomics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11: 354-363.
31. Todd, A.E., Orengo, C.A., and Thomton, J.M. 2001. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J. Mol. Biol. 307: 1113-1143.
32. -. 2002. Plasticity of enzyme active sites. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27: 419-426.
33. Tsai, C.J., Lin, S.L., Wolfson, H.J., and Nussinov, R. 1997. Studies of protein-protein interfaces: A statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect. Protein Sci. 6: 53-64.
34. Yang, Z. 1997. PAML: A program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13: 555-556.