Identifying principles for place-based governance in biosphere reserves

Environments

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 27-41

  Pollock, Rebecca M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b TRENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTECTED AREA; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 18244394798     PISSN: 07116780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ahmed F. 1999. A Shared Environmental Challenge. In Civil Society and Global Change: Canadian Development Report, van Rooy, ed. The North South Institute.
2. Alexander, D. 1990. Bioregionalism: Science or Sensibility? Environmental Ethics 12 (2): 161-173.
3. Alexander, D. 2002. Knowledge, Convergence and the Emergence of Place: A case study of the Oak Ridges Moraine. Presentation to the Environmental Studies Association of Canada.
4. Banks, S. and F. Shenton. 2001. Regenerating Neighbourhoods: a critical look at the role of community capacity building. Local Economy 16: 286-298.
5. Barnes, M. 1999. Researching Public Participation. Local Government Studies 25: 60-75.
6. Beierle, T.C. and D. M. Konisky. 2001. What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19: 515-527.
7. Botes, L. and D. van Rensburg. 2000. Community Participation in Development: nine plagues and twelve commandments. Community Development Journal 35: 41-58.
8. Brunckhorst, D. 2001. Building capital through bioregional planning and biosphere reserves. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics February: 19-32.
9. Bryant, C.R. 1997. The management of processes of change in Canada's small towns and villages. In Challenge and Opportunity: Managing Change in Canadian Towns and Villages, C. Mitchell and F. Dahms, eds. Waterloo, Ontario: University of Waterloo, 1-28.
10. Bulkeley, H. and A.P.J. Mol. 2003. Participation and Environmental Governance: Consensus, Ambivalence and Debate. Environmental Values 12: 143-154.
11. Clark, J., S. Stirling, K. Studd, and J. Burgess. 2001. Local Outreach: Research and Development Technical Report SWCON 204. Bristol: Environment Agency, UK.
12. Clifford, S. and A. King, eds. 1993. Local Distinctiveness: Place, Particularity and Identity. London: Common Ground.
13. Dryzek, J. S. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
14. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). 1998. Global Environmental Change Programme. Strengthening Decision-Making for Sustainable Development: report of a workshop held at Eynsham Hall, Oxford (15-16 June, 1998). Sussex: ESRC.
15. Francis, G. 1988. Institutions and ecosystem redevelopment in Great Lakes North America with reference to Baltic Europe. Ambio: Journal of the Human Environment 17 (2): 106-111.
16. Francis, G. 2003. Governance for Conservation. In Experiments in Consilience: Integrating Social and Scientffic Responses to Save Endangered Species. F. R. Westley and P. S. Miller, eds) Washington: Island Press, 223-379.
17. Healey, P. 1998. Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning A 30: 1531-1546.
18. Jessop, B. 2002. Governance and Metagovernance: On Reflexivity, Requisite Variety, and Requisite Irony. Published by the Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, UK. Online Paper: http:// comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/ Jessop-Goverenance-and-Metagovernance.pdf [Accessed in Sept. 2004].
19. Jessop, B. 1997. Capitalism and its Future: Remarks in Regulation, Government and Governance. Review of International Political Economy 4 (3): 561-581.
20. Kaldor, M. 2003. The idea of global civil society. International Affairs 79 (3): 583-593.
21. Kelsey, E. 2003. Integrating Multiple Knowledge Systems into Environmental Decision-making: Two Case Studies of Participatory Biodiversity Initiatives in Canada and their Implications for Conceptions of Education and Public Involvement. Environmental Values 12: 381-396.
22. Knight, J. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Latour, B. 1986. The powers of association. In Law, J. (ed.), Action Belief: A New Society of Knowledge? London: Routledge and KeganPaul.
24. Law, J. 1992. Notes on the Theory of the Actor Network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity. Lancaster University, http:// www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/SOC054jl/html [Accessed in Sept. 2004].
25. Maloney, W., G. Smith, G. Stoker. 2000. Social capital and urban governance: adding a more contextualized 'top-down' perspective. Political Studies 48: 802-820.
26. McKinney, C., C. Fitch and W. Harmon. 2002. Regionalism in the West: An Inventory and Assessment. Prepared for the Public Land and Resources Law Review.
27. Nozick, M. 1992. No Place Like Home: building sustainable communities . Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Council on Social Development.
28. Painter, J. 2001. Governance. The Dictionary of Human Geography, 4th edition, in R.J. Johnson, D. Gregory, G. Pratt and M. Watts (eds.), Blackwell publishers, Oxford, UK and Massachusetts, USA.
29. Petts, J. 2001. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deliberative Processes: waste management case studies. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management: 207-266.
30. Plummer, J. 1999. Municipalities and Community Participation: a sourcebook for capacity building. London: Earthscan.
31. Pollock, R. M. and G. S. Whitelaw. forthcoming. Community-Based Monitoring in Support of Local Sustainability. Local Environment.
32. Renn, O., Webler, T., Rakel, H., Dienel, P. and Johnson, B. 1995. Public Participation in Decision Making: a three step procedure. Policy Sciences 26: 189-214.
33. Roseland, M. 2000. Sustainable Community Development: Integrating environmental, economic and social objectives. Progress in Planning 54: 73-132.
34. Rowe, G. and L. J. Frewer. 2000. Public Participation Methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values 25: 3-29.
35. Rudd, M. A., 2000. Live Long and Prosper: collective action, social capital and social vision. Ecological Economics 34: 131-144.
36. Rydin, Y. and M. Pennington. 2000. "Public Participation and Local Environmental Planning: the collective action problem and the potential of social capital," Local Environment 5: 153-169.
37. Simmons P. J. 1998. Learning to Live With NGOs. Foreign Policy, Fall 1998.
38. Sobels, J., A. Curtis, and S. Lockie. 2001. The role of landcare group networks in rural Australia: exploring the contribution of social capital. Journal of Rural Studies 17, 265-276.
39. Sommer, F. 2000. Monitoring and Evaluating Outcomes of Community Involvement - the LITMUS experience. Local Environment 5: 483-491.
40. Swift, J., 1999. Civil Society in Question. Between the Lines, Toronto.
41. Trist, E. 1983. Referrent Organizations and the Development of Inter-Organizational Domain. Human Relations 36: 269-284.
42. Wharf, B. and M. Clague, ads. 1997. Community Organizing: Canadian experiences. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
43. Whitelaw, G. and J. Hamilton. 2004. Evolution of Niagara Escarpment Governance, Making Ecosystem Based Management Work: Connecting Managers and Researchers. in N.W.P Munro, P. Dearden, T.B. Herman, K. Beazley and S. Bondrup-Nielson (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth lnternational Conference on Science and the Management of Protected Areas, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, May 11-16, 2003.
44. Whitelaw, G., H. Vaughon, B. Craig and D. Athinson. 2003. Establishing the Canadian Community Monitoring Network. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 88(1-3): 409-418.
45. Woods, M., 1997. Researching rural conflicts: hunting, local politics and actor-networks. Journal of Rural Sociology 14, (3), 321-340.
46. Young, O. R. 1997. Arctic Governance: Bringing the High Latitudes In from the Cold. International Environmental Affairs 9 (1): 54-68.