Dwell-time-limited coherence in open quantum dots

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 14, 2005, Pages

  Hackens, B ^a   Faniel, S ^a   Gustin, C ^a   Wallart, X ^b   Bollaert, S ^b   Cappy, A ^b   Bayot, V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b INSTITUT D ELECTRONIQUE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION FIELD METHODS; DWELL-TIME-LIMITED COHERENCE; ELECTRON INTERFERENCE; QUANTUM CHANNELS;

COHERENT LIGHT; CORRELATION THEORY; CRYOGENICS; HETEROJUNCTIONS; HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS; INTEGRATION; SEMICONDUCTING INDIUM GALLIUM ARSENIDE; THERMAL EFFECTS;

SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

EID: 18244386483     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.146802     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. J. J. Lin and J. P. Bird, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, R501 (2002).
2. P. Mohanty, E. M. Q. Jariwala, and R. A. Webb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3366 (1997); F. Pierre and N. O. Birge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 206804 (2002); P. Mohanty and R.A. Webb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 066604 (2003).
3. P. Mohanty, E. M. Q. Jariwala, and R. A. Webb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3366 (1997); F. Pierre and N. O. Birge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 206804 (2002); P. Mohanty and R.A. Webb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 066604 (2003).
4. P. Mohanty, E. M. Q. Jariwala, and R. A. Webb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3366 (1997); F. Pierre and N. O. Birge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 206804 (2002); P. Mohanty and R.A. Webb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 066604 (2003).
5. R.M. Clarke et al., Phys. Rev. B 52, 2656 (1995).
6. J.P. Bird et al., Phys. Rev. B 51, R18037 (1995).
7. A. G. Huibers et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5090 (1999).
8. D. P. Pivin, A. Andresen, J. P. Bird, and D. K. Ferry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4687 (1999).
9. A. P. Micolich et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 036802 (2001).
10. J.P. Bird et al., J. Phys. Condens. Matter 10, L55 (1998).
11. d is valid provided that electron dynamics is chaotic inside the QD.
12. 2/h, so that N = 3, the two QPCs supporting, respectively, one and two quantum modes.
13. B. Hackens et al., Phys. Rev. B 66, 241305(R) (2002); B. Hackens et al., Physica (Amsterdam) 17E, 143 (2003).
14. B. Hackens et al., Phys. Rev. B 66, 241305(R) (2002); B. Hackens et al., Physica (Amsterdam) 17E, 143 (2003).
15. K. Frahm, Europhys. Lett. 30, 457 (1995); P.W. Brouwer, J.N.H.J. Cremers, and B.I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. B 65, 081302(R) (2002).
16. K. Frahm, Europhys. Lett. 30, 457 (1995); P.W. Brouwer, J.N.H.J. Cremers, and B.I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. B 65, 081302(R) (2002).
17. The error bar over var(G) takes into account the error over the background subtraction procedure.
18. φ.
19. φ ≫1, a condition which is satisfied here.
20. onset is not generally valid.
21. B. Hackens et al., Phys. Rev. B 67, 121403(R) (2003).
22. J. Tworzydlo, A. Tajic, H. Schomerus, P. W. Brouwer, and C.W.J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 186806 (2004).
23. N.W. Ashcroft and N.D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Saunders College, Philadelphia, 1976).
24. J.A. Folk, C.M. Marcus, and J.S. Harris, Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 206802 (2001); E. Eisenberg, K. Held, and B.L. Altshuler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 136801 (2002).
25. J.A. Folk, C.M. Marcus, and J.S. Harris, Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 206802 (2001); E. Eisenberg, K. Held, and B.L. Altshuler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 136801 (2002).