Evidence for minority male mating success and minority female mating disadvantage in Drosophila ananassae

Genetics and Molecular Research

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-17

  Som, Arundhati ^a   Singh, Bashisth N ^a  

^a BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Drosophila ananassae; Minority mating success; Multiple choice experiments; Mutant flies; Wild type flies

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSORTATIVE MATING; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA ANANASSAE; FEMALE; MALE; MATING; MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; SEX RATIO; WILD TYPE;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; MALE; MUTATION; SEX FACTORS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

DROSOPHILA ANANASSAE;

EID: 18044363451     PISSN: 16765680     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Adams, W.T. and Duncan, G.T. (1979). A maximum likelihood statistical method for analyzing frequency-dependent fitness experiments. Behav. Genet. 9: 7-21.
2. Anderson, W.W. (1969). Polymorphism resulting from the mating advantage of rare male genotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 64: 190-197.
3. Anderson, W.W. and McGuire, P.R. (1978). Mating pattern and mating success of Drosophila pseudoobscura karyotypes in large experimental populations. Evolution 32: 416-423.
4. Ayala, F.J. (1972). Frequency-dependent mating advantage in Drosophila. Behav. Genet. 2: 85-91.
5. Ayala, F.J. and Campbell, C.A. (1974). Frequency-dependent selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 115-138.
6. Ball, S.J., Adams, M., Possingham, H.P. and Keller, M.A. (2000). The genetic contribution of single male immigrants to small, inbred populations: a laboratory study using Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 84: 677-684.
7. Barker, J.S.F. (1962). Studies of selective mating using the yellow mutant of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 47: 623-640.
8. Bastock, M. (1956). A gene mutation which changes a behaviour pattern. Evolution 10: 421-439.
9. Blows, M.W. and Allan, R.A. (1998). Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. Am. Nat. 6: 826-837.
10. Bonduriansky, R. (2001). The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol. Rev. 76: 305-339.
11. Bryant, E.H., Kence, A. and Kimball, K.T. (1980). A rare-male advantage in the housefly induced by wing clipping and some general considerations for Drosophila. Genetics 96: 975-993.
12. Burnet, B. and Connolly, K. (1974). Activity and sexual behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. In: The Genetics of Behaviour (van Abeelen, J.H.F., ed.). Amsterdam, North-Holland.
13. Cakir, S. and Kence, A. (1999). Lack of minority advantage in Drosophila melanogaster mutants. Turk. J. Biol. 23: 433-443.
14. Casares, P., Carracedo, M.C., Del Rio, B., Pineiro, R., Garcia-Florez, L. and Barros, A.R. (1998). Disentangaling the effects of mating propensity and mating choice in Drosophila. Evolution 52: 126-133.
15. Cereghetti, M., Jacquemin, F., Hols, P., Lichtenberger, M. and Elens, A. (1987). Measurement of frequency-dependent sexual activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 75: 167-171.
16. Chatterjee, S. and Singh, B.N. (1989). Rare male mating advantage. Cell Biol. Newsletter 11: 29-34.
17. Cobb, M. and Ferveur, J.F. (1996). Evolution and genetic control of mate recognition and stimulation in Drosophila. Behav. Proc. 35: 35-54.
18. Dal Molin, C. (1979). An external scent as the basis for a rare-male mating advantage in Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 113: 951-954.
19. Depiereux, E., Dernoncourt-Sterpin, C., Lechein, J., Feytmans, E. and Elens, A. (1990). Direct observation of sexual competition in Drosophila melanogaster: The mutant white in competition with other genotypes. Behav. Genet. 20: 511-533.
20. Dernoncourt-Sterpin, C., Lechien, J. and Elens, A. (1991). Sex ratio, relative frequency, and mating success in two genotypes of Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 21: 471-485.
21. Dobzhansky, Th. and Holz, A.M. (1943). A re-examination of the problem of manifold effects of genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 28: 295-303.
22. Ehrman, L. (1966). Mating success and genotype frequency in Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 14: 332-339.
23. Ehrman, L. (1990). Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behaviour of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Behav. Genet. 20: 609-615.
24. Ehrman, L. and Kim, Y.-K. (1995). Influence of developmental isolation on Drosophila paulistorum rare male mating advantages. Dros. Inf. Serv. 76: 125-126.
25. Ehrman, L. and Spiess, E.B. (1969). Rare-type mating advantage in Drosophila. Am. Nat. 103: 675-680.
26. Ehrman, L., Koref-Santibanez, S. and Falk, C.T. (1972). Frequency dependent mating in two species of the mesophragmatica species groups of Drosophila. Dros. Inf. Serv. 48: 36-37.
27. Elens, A.A. and Wattiaux, J.M. (1964). Direct observation of sexual isolation. Dros. Inf. Serv. 39: 118-119.
28. Grant, B., Burton, S., Contoreggi, C. and Rothstein, M. (1980). Outbreeding via frequency-dependent mate selection in the parasitoid wasp, Nasonia (= Mormoniella) vitripennis Walker. Evolution 34: 983-992.
29. Heisler, I.L. (1984). Inheritance of female mating propensities for yellow locus genotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 44: 133-149.
30. Johnson, T.K. and Judd, B.H. (1979). Analysis of the cut locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 92: 485-502.
31. Just, J. and Markow, T. (1989). Success of mutant Drosophila at different sex ratios. Hereditas 110: 51-53.
32. Kearns, P.W.E., Tomlinson, I.P.M., O'Donald, P. and Veltman, C.J. (1990). Non-random mating in the two-spot lady bird (Adalia bipunctata): I. A reassessment of the evidence. Heredity 65: 229-240.
33. Knoppien, P. (1985a). Rare male mating advantage: a review. Biol. Rev. 60: 81-117.
34. Knoppien, P. (1985b). The numbers of males stored per vial, a possible source of bias in rare male experiments. Dros. Inf. Serv. 61: 101.
35. Knoppien, P. (1987). Rare-male mating advantage: An artifact caused by differential storage conditions? Behav. Genet. 17: 409-425.
36. Lewontin, R.C. (1974). The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. Columbia University Press, New York.
37. Lichtenberger, M., Lechien, J. and Elens, A. (1988). The frequency dependence of mating success in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 77: 25-52.
38. Markow, T.A. (1980). Rare-male advantages among Drosophila of the same laboratory strain. Behav. Genet. 10: 553-555.
39. Merrell, D.J. (1950). Measurement of sexual isolation and selective mating. Evolution 4: 326-331.
40. Noor, M.A.F. (1996). Absence of species discrimination in Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis males. Anim. Behav. 52: 1205-1210.
41. Ochando, M.D. (1981). Mating behaviour and analysis of eye pigmentation of several mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 55: 117-121.
42. O'Donald, P. (1977). Mating advantage of rare males in models of sexual selection. Nature 267: 151-154.
43. Partridge, L. (1988). The rare-male effect: what is its evolutionary significance? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 319: 525-539.
44. Peterson, J.R. and Merrell, D.J. (1983). Rare male mating disadvantage in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 37: 1306-1316.
45. Petit, C. (1951). Le role de lisolment sexuel dans levolution des populations de Drosophila melanogaster. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 85: 392-418.
46. Petit, C. (1954). L'isolement sexuel chez Drosophila melanogaster. Etude du mutant white et de son alle'lomorphe sauvage. Bull. Biol. 88: 435-443.
47. Pot, W., Van Delden, W. and Kruijt, J.P. (1980). Genotypic differences in mating success and the maintenance of the alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster: No evidence for over dominance or rare genotype mating advantage. Behav. Genet. 10: 43-58.
48. Sequeira, W., Nelson, C.R. and Szanter, P. (1989). Genetic analysis of the claret locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 123: 511-524.
49. Singh, B.N. (1996). Population and behaviour genetics of Drosophila ananassae. Genetica 97: 321-329.
50. Singh, B.N. (2000). Drosophila ananassae: a species characterized by several unusual genetic features. Curr. Sci. 78: 391-398.
51. Singh, B.N. and Chatterjee, S. (1989). Rare-male mating advantage in Drosophila ananassae. Genet. Sel. Evol. 21: 447-455.
52. Singh, B.N. and Singh, S.R. (2001). Female remating in Drosophila ananassae: Evidence for sperm displacement and greater productivity after remating. Zool. Sci. 18: 181-185.
53. Singh, B.N. and Sisodia, S. (1996). No effect of cut wing mutation on mating propensity in Drosophila bipectinata. Biol. Zentralbl. 115: 46-50.
54. Singh, B.N. and Sisodia, S. (1997). Evidence for rare-male mating advantage in Drosophila bipectinata. Genetika 29: 41-48.
55. Singh, B.N. and Sisodia, S. (2000). Frequency-dependent selection: minority male mating advantage in Drosophila. Curr. Sci. 78: 141-150.
56. Singh, B.N. and Som, A. (2001). Evidence for rare male mating advantage and sexual isolation in two karyotypically different strains of Drosophila ananassae. Curr. Sci. 81: 1473-1477.
57. Som, A. and Singh, B.N. (2002). No evidence for minority male mating advantage in wild-type strains of Drosophila ananassae tested in multiple-choice experiments. Genet. Mol. Res. 1: 317-326.
58. Som, A. and Singh, B.N. (2004). Rare male mating advantage for inversion karyotype of Drosophila ananassae. Behav. Genet. 34: 335-342.
59. Sondergaard, L. (1986). Mating competition in artificial populations of Drosophila melanogaster polymorphic for ebony II. A test for minority male mating advantage. Genet. Res. 47: 205-208.
60. Spiess, E.B. (1968). Low frequency advantage in mating of Drosophila pseudoobscura karyotypes. Am. Nat. 102: 363-379.
61. Spiess, E.B. and Bowbal, D.A. (1987). Minority mating advantage of certain eye color mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Female discrimination among three genotypes. Behav. Genet. 17: 291-306.
62. Spiess, E.B. and Kruckeberg, J.F. (1980). Minority advantage of certain eye color mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. II. A behavioral basis. Am. Nat. 115: 307-327.
63. Spieth, H.T. (1966). Mating behaviour of D. ananassae and ananassae-like flies from the Pacific. Univ. Tex. Publ. 6615: 133-145.
64. Sturtevant, A.H. (1915). Experiments on sex recognition and the problem of sexual selection in Drosophila. J. Anim. Behav. 5: 351-366.
65. Terzic, T., Andjelkovic, M., Marinkovic, D. and Stamenkovic-Radak, M. (1996). Frequency dependent selection: I. Rare male phenomenon in Drosophila subobscura dependent on the proportion of Amy genotypes and substrate composition. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 337-355.
66. Threlkeld, S.F.H., Procwat, R.A., Abbot, K.S. and Yeung, A.D. (1974). Genetically based behaviour patterns in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 247: 232-233.
67. Tobari, Y.N. (Ed.) (1993). Drosophila ananassae. Genetical and Biological Aspects. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, Japan.
68. Van Gossum, H., Stoks, R. and De Bruyn, L. (2000). Reversible frequency-dependent switches in male mate choice. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 83-85.
69. Wilson, R., Burnet, B., Easrtwood, L. and Connolly, K. (1976). Behavioural pleiotropy of the yellow gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 28: 75-88.