Rare Male Mating Advantage for Inversion Karyotype in Drosophila ananassae

Behavior Genetics

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 335-342

  Som, Arundhati ^a   Singh, B N ^a  

^a BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Alpha inversion; Drosophila ananassae; Inversion polymorphism; Preferential mating; Rare male mating advantage

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME INVERSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPULATION; DNA POLYMORPHISM; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA ANANASSAE; FEMALE; GENE REARRANGEMENT; KARYOTYPE; MALE; MATING; NONHUMAN; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; INVERSION, CHROMOSOME; KARYOTYPING; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

ARACHNIDA; DROSOPHILA ANANASSAE; HEXAPODA;

EID: 1842614313     PISSN: 00018244     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:BEGE.0000017877.04396.d1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alvarez, G., and Zapata, C. (1997). Conditions for protected inversion polymorphism under supergene selection. Genetics 146:717-722.
2. Anderson, W. W., Arnold, J., Sammons, S., and Yardley, D. G. (1986). Frequency-dependent viabilities of Drosophila pseudoobscura karyotypes. Heredity 56:7-17.
3. Anderson, W. W., Levine, L., Olvera, O., Powell, J. R., De La Rosa, M. E., Salceda, V. M., Gaso, M. I., and Guzman, J. (1979). Evidence for selection by male mating success in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:1519-1523.
4. Anderson, W. W., and Watanabe, T. K. (1974). Selection by fertility in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 77:559-564.
5. Aulard, S., David, J. R., and Lemeunier, F. (2002). Chromosomal inversion polymorphism in Afrotropical populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. Camb. 79:49-63.
6. Ayala, F. J. (1972). Frequency-dependent mating advantage in Drosophila. Behav. Genet. 2:85-91.
7. Bryant, E. H., Kence, A., and Kimball, K. T. (1980). A rare-male advantage in the housefly induced by wing clipping and some general considerations for Drosophila. Genetics 96:975-993.
8. da Cunha, A. B. (1960). Chromosomal variations and adaptation in insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 5:85-110.
9. Dobzhansky, Th. (1947a). Adaptive changes induced by natural selection in wild populations of Drosophila. Evolution 1:1-16.
10. Dobzhansky, Th. (1947b). Genetics of natural populations. XIV. A response of certain gene arrangements in the third chromosome of Drosophila pseudoobscura to natural selection. Genetics 32:142-160.
11. Dobzhansky, Th. (1951). Genetics and Origin of the Species, 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
12. Dobzhansky, Th., and Levene, H. (1951). Development of heterosis through natural selection in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Am. Nat. 85:247-264.
13. Doi, M., Nemoto, T., Nakanishi, H., Kuwahara, Y., and Oguma, Y. (1997). Behavioural response of males to major sex pheromone component, (Z,Z)-5,25-hentriacontadiene, of Drosophila ananassae females. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:2067-2078.
14. Ehrman, L. (1966). Mating success and genotype frequency in Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 14:332-339.
15. Ehrman, L. (1967). Further studies on genotype frequency and mating success in Drosophila. Am. Nat. 101:415-424.
16. Ehrman, L. (1970). Sexual isolation versus mating advantage of rare Drosophila males. Behav. Genet. 1:111-118.
17. Ehrman, L. (1972). A factor influencing the rare male mating advantage in Drosophila. Behav. Genet. 2:69-78.
18. Elens, A. A., and Wattiaux, J. M. (1964). Direct observation of sexual isolation. Dros. Info. Serv. 39:118-119.
19. Gromko, M. H., and Richmond, R. C. (1978). Modes of selection maintaining an inversion polymorphism in Drosophila paulistorum. Genetics 88:357-366.
20. Kence, A., and Bryant, E. H. (1978). A model of mating behaviour in flies. Am. Nat. 112:1047-1062.
21. Knoppien, P. (1985a). Rare male mating advantage: A review. Biol. Rev. 60:81-117.
22. Knoppien, P. (1985b). The numbers of males stored per vial: A possible source of bias in rare male experiments. Dros. Info. Serv. 61:101.
23. Kojima, K. I., and Tobari, Y. N. (1969). Selective modes associated with karyotypes in Drosophila ananassae. II. Heterosis and frequency-dependent selection. Genetics 63:639-651.
24. Markow, T. A. (1980). Rare-male advantages among Drosophila of the same laboratory strain. Behav. Genet. 10:553-555.
25. Mather, K. (1966). Statistical Analysis in Biology, 4th ed. London: Methuen.
26. Merrell, D. J. (1950). Measurement of sexual isolation and selective mating. Evolution 4:326-331.
27. Mestres, F., Balanya, J., Arenas, C., Sole, E., and Serra, L. (2001). Colonization of America by Drosophila subobscura: Heterotic effect of chromosomal arrangements revealed by the persistence of lethal genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:9167-9170.
28. Moriwaki, D., Ohnishi, M., and Nakajima, Y. (1956). Analysis of heterosis in population of Drosophila ananassae. Proc. Int. Genet. Symp. Cytologia Suppl. pp. 370-379.
29. Petit, C. (1951). Le role de lisolment sexuel dans levolution des populations de Drosophila melanogaster. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 85:392-418.
30. Powell, J. R. (1997). Progress and prospects in evolutionary biology: The Drosophila model. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Pruzan, A. (1976). Effects of age, rearing and mating experiences on frequency-dependent sexual selection in Drosophila pseudo-obscura. Evolution 30:132-145.
32. Robertson, H. M. (1982). Female courtship summation in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 30:1105-1117.
33. Salceda, V. M., and Anderson, W. W. (1988). Rare male mating advantage in a natural population of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:9870-9874.
34. Singh, B. N. (1985). Heterosis without selectional coadaptation in Drosophila ananassae. Theor. Appl. Genet. 69:437-441.
35. Singh, B. N. (1998). Population genetics of inversion polymorphism in Drosophila ananassae. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 36:739-748.
36. Singh, B. N., and Chatterjee, S. (1986). Mating ability of homo and heterokaryotypes of Drosophila ananassae from natural populations. Heredity 57:75-78.
37. Singh, B. N., and Chatterjee, S. (1988). Parallelism between male mating propensity and chromosome arrangement frequency in natural populations of Drosophila ananassae. Heredity 60: 269-272.
38. Singh, B. N., and Sisodia, S. (2000). Frequency-dependent selection: Minority male mating advantage in Drosophila. Curr. Sci. 78:141-150.
39. Singh, B. N., and Som, A. (2001). Evidence for rare male mating advantage and sexual isolation in two karyotypically different strains of Drosophila ananassae. Curr. Sci. 81:1473-1477.
40. Som, A., and Singh, B. N. (2001). Lack of evidence for rare male mating advantage in wild type strains of Drosophila ananassae. Curr. Sci. 81:383-387.
41. Som, A., and Singh, B. N. (2003). A test for minority mating success in Drosophila ananassae. Genet. Mol. Res.
42. Sperlich, D., and Pfriem, P. (1986). Chromosomal polymorphism in natural and experimental populations. In M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson and J. N. Thompson, Jr. (eds.), The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila (Vol. 3e, pp. 257-309). New York: Academic Press.
43. Spiess, E. B. (1968). Low frequency advantage in mating of Drosophila pseudoobscura karyotypes. Am. Nat. 102:363-379.
44. Tobari, Y. N. (ed.) (1993). Drosophila ananassae: Genetical and Biological Aspects. Tokyo: Japan Scientific Societies Press.
45. Wasserman, M. (1968). Recombination induced chromosomal heterosis. Genetics 58:125-139.
46. Wright, S., and Dobzhansky, Th. (1946). Genetics of natural populations. XII. Experimental reproduction of some of the changes caused by natural selection in certain populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 31:125-156.