The development of the Attitude Towards Computerized Assessment Scale

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 407-422

  Smith, Brooke ^a   Caputi, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17844387397     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/R6RV-PAQY-5RG8-2XGP     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. American Psychological Association (APA). (1986). Guidelines for computer-based tests and interpretations. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Anastasi, A. (1990). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
3. Arbuckle, J. L. (1998). AMOS. SmallWaters Corp.
4. Arvey, R. D., Strickland, W., Drauden, G., & Martin, C. (1990). Motivational components of test-taking. Personnel Psychology, 43, 695-716.
5. Bernt, F. M., Bugbee, A. C., & Arceo, R. D. (1990). Factors influencing student resistance to computer administered testing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22(3), 265-275.
6. Bocij, P., & Greasley, A. (1999). Can computer-based testing achieve quality and efficiency in assessment? Intemational Journal of Educational Technology, 7(1).
7. Bresolin, M. J. (1984). A comparative study of computer administration of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 543-549.
8. Burke, M. J., Normand, J., & Raju, N. S. (1987). Examinee attitudes toward computer-administered ability testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 3(2), 95-107.
9. Chin, C. H. L., Donn, S., & Conry, R. F. (1991). Effects of computer-based tests on the achievement, anxiety, and attitudes of Grade 10 science students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(3), 735-745.
10. Federico, P. A. (1992). Assessing semantic knowledge using computer-based and paper-based media. Computers in Human Behavior, 8(2-3), 169-181.
11. Fulcher, G. (1999). Computerizing an English language placement test. ELT Journal, 53(4), 289-299.
12. Gigliotti, R. J., Smerglia, V. L., Falk, R. F., & Neiswander, N. (1994). Computer-based testing in sociology: A description and evaluation. Teaching Sociology, 22, 32-39.
13. Goldberg, A. L. (2000). Test-level, item-level, and experiential differences on computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of a practice Graduate Record Exam (GRE). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College.
14. Hank, P., & Schwnekmezger, P. (1993). Computer-assisted versus pencil-and-paper based self-monitoring: An analysis of experiential and psychometric equivalence. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment: Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring field studies (pp. 85-99). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
15. Hedl, J. J., O'Neil, H. F., & Hansen, D. N. (1973). Affective reactions toward computer-based intelligence testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40(2), 217-222.
16. Hofer, P. (1985). Developing standards for computerized testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 301-315.
17. Hofer, P. J., & Green, B. F. (1985). The challenge of competence and creativity in computerized psychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(6), 826-838.
18. Honaker, L. M. (1988). The equivalency of computerized and conventional MMPI administration: A critical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 561-577.
19. Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (1997). Psychological testing: Principles, applications and issues (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
20. Legg, S. M., & Buhr, D. C. (1992). Computerized adaptive testing with different groups. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11(2), 23-27.
21. McDonald, A. S. (2002). The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computer-based and paper-and-pencil educational assessments. Computers & Education, 39(3), 299-312.
22. Moe, K. C., & Johnson, M. F. (1988). Participants' reactions to computerized testing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 79-86.
23. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Ogilvie, R. W., Trusk, T. C., & Blue, A. V. (1999). Student's attitudes towards computer testing in a basic science course. Medical Education, 33(11), 828-831.
25. Parshall, C. G., & Kromrey, J. D. (1993, April 12-16). Computer testing versus paper-and-pencil testing an analysis of examinee characteristics associated with mode effect. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
26. Parshall, C. G., Spray, J. A., Kalohn, J. C., & Davey, T. (2002). Practical considerations in computer-based testing. New York: Springer.
27. Powers, D. E., & O'Neill, K. (1993). Inexperienced and anxious computer users: Coping with a computer-administered test of academic skills. Educational Assessment, 1, 153-173.
28. Rasulis, R., Schuldberg, D., & Murtagh, M. (1996). Computer-administered testing with the Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(4), 497-513.
29. Richman-Hirsch, W. L., Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Drasgow, F. (2000). Examining the impact of administration medium on examinee perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 880-887.
30. Rozensky, R. H., Honor, L. F., Rasinski, K., Tovian, S. M., & Herz, G. I. (1986). Paper-and-pencil versus computer administered MMPI'S: A comparison of patient's attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 2, 111-116.
31. Schaeffer, G. A., Reese, C. M., Steffen, M., McKinley, R. L., & Mills, C. N. (1993). Field test of a computer-based GRE General Test (GRF Board Rep. No. 88-08P). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
32. Schmitt, N., Gilliland, S. W., Landis, R., & Devine, D. (1993). Computer-based testing applied to selection of secretarial applicants. Personnel Psychology, 46(1), 149-165.
33. Schulenberg, S. E., & Yutrzenka, B. A. (1999). The equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil psychological instruments: Implications for measures of negative affect. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 31(2), 315-321.
34. Segall, D. O., & Moreno, K. E. (1999). Development of the computerized adaptive testing version of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. In F. Drasgow & J. B. Olsen-Buchanan (Eds.), Innovations in computerized assessment (pp. 35-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Singleton, C. H., Home, J., & Thomas, K. (1999). Computerized baseline assessment of literacy. Journal of Research in Reading, 22(1), 67-80.
36. Smith, B. L. (2003). Conventional versus computer-based administration of measures of cognitive ability: An analysis of psychometric, behaviourial, experiential and relativity of equivalence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wollongong.
37. Steele, D. J., Johnson Palensky, J. E., Lynch, T. G., Lacy, N. L., & Duffy, S. W. (2001). Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and test performance: Response to computer-aided instruction. Medical Education, 36, 225-232.
38. Stricker, L. J., & Wilder, G. Z. (2001). Examinees' attitudes about the TOEFL-CBT, possible determinants, and relationships with test performance (Research Rep. No. 01-01). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
39. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
40. Tonidandel, S., Quinones, M. A., & Adams, A. A. (2002). Computer-adaptive testing: The impact of test characteristics on perceived performance and test takers' reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 320-332.
41. Vispoel, W. P., Rocklin, T. R., & Wang, T. (1994). Individual differences and test administration procedures: A comparison of fixed-item, computerized-adaptive, and self-adapted testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(1), 53-79.
42. Webster, J., & Compeau, D. (1996). Computer-assisted versus paper-and-pencil administration of questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 28(4), 567-576.
43. Zandvliet, D., & Farragher, P. (1997). A comparison of computer-administered and written tests. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(4), 423-438.