Computer-administered testing with the Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 497-513

  Rasulis Jr , Richard ^a   Schuldberg, David ^b   Murtagh, Michael ^b  

^a Willows Intensive Youth Services   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER APPLICATIONS;

COMPUTER ADMINISTERED TESTING; PROJECTIVE PERSONALITY MEASURES; ROTTER INCOMPLETE SENTENCES BLANK (RISB);

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0030402286     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0747-5632(96)00021-0     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Archer, R. A. (1992, April). The MMPI-A Workshop. Speech presented at the convention of the Wisconsin Psychological Association, Wauwatosa, WI.
2. Bellak, L. (1986). The Thematic Apperception Test, Children's Apperception Test, and Senior Apperception Technique in Clinical Use (4th ed.). New York: Grune & Stratton.
3. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. (1986). Computers in personality assessment: A brief past, an ebullient present, and an expanding future. Computers in Human Behavior, 2, 167-182.
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Everett, T. (1992). Scale inconsistency on the Adjective Check List: Total number of items checked in computer versus conventional administration modes. Unpublished Bachelor's thesis, The University of Montana.
6. Exner, J. E. (1987). Computer assistance in Rorschach interpretation. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Computerized psychological assessment: A practitioners guide (pp. 218-235). New York: Basic.
7. Exner, J. E. (1993). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system, Volume 1: Basic foundations (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley Interscience.
8. Exner, J. E., Jr., & Ona, N. (1995). Rorschach Interpretation Assistance Program (Version 3.1) [Computer software]. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
9. Fiske, D. W., & Baughman, E. E. (1965). Relationship between Rorschach scoring categories and the total number of responses. In B. I. Murstein (Ed.), Handbook of projective techniques (pp. 257-271). New York: Basic Books.
10. Fleiss, J. L. (1973). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.
11. Fleiss, J. L. (1986). The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: Wiley.
12. Goldberg, J. B. (1966). Computer analysis of sentence completions. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 30, 37-45.
13. Gorham, D. R. (1967). Validity and reliability studies of a computer-based scoring system for inkblot responses. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 65-70.
14. Gorham, D. R., Moseley, E. C., & Holtzman, W. H. (1968). Norms for the computer-scored Holtzman Inkblot Technique [Monograph]. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 26, 1279-1305.
15. Greist, J. H., Klein, M. H., Van Cura, L. J., & Erdman, H. P. (1975). Computer interview questionnaires for drug use/abuse. In D. J. Lettieri (Ed.), Predicting adolescent drug abuse: A review of issues, methods, and correlates (pp. 147-164). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Drug Abuse.
16. Harris, W. G., & Allred, L. J. (1987, August). Computer administration of the Adjective Check List: A study of mode effect. Paper presented at the convention of the American Psychological Association, New York.
17. Harris, W. G., Niedner, D., Feldman, C., Fink, A., & Johnson, J. H. (1981). An on-line interpretive Rorschach approach: Using Exner's comprehensive system. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 13, 588-591.
18. Holmstrom, R. W., Silber, D. E., & Karp, S. A. (1990). Development of the Apperceptive Personality Test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 252-264.
19. Honaker, L. M. (1988). The equivalency of computerized and conventional MMPI administration: A critical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 561-577.
20. Hopwood, J. H., Kwo-Tsair, H. W., & Yellin, A. M. (1981). A computerized method for generating the Rorschach's structural summary from the sequence of scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 116-117.
21. Lucas, R. W., Mullin, P. J., Luna, C. B. X., & McInroy, D. C. (1977). Comparing computerized vs. traditional psychological assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 49-58.
22. Meier, S. T. (1988). Predicting individual differences in performance on computer-administered tests and tasks: Development of the Computer Aversion Scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 175-187.
23. Menaker, S. L., Veldman, D. J., & Peck, R. F. (1966). Prediction of mental health through computer scoring of a sentence completion test [Abstract]. American Psychologist, 21, 634.
24. Miller, F. E. (1986). The development and evaluation of an online computer-assisted Rorschach inkblot test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 222-228.
25. Moreland, K. L. (1987). Computerized psychological assessment: What's available. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Computerized psychological assessment: A practitioner's guide (pp. 3-14). New York: Basic Books.
26. Moseley, E. C., Gorham, D. R., & Hill, E. (1963). Computer scoring of inkblot perceptions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 17, 498.
27. Murstein, B. I. (1965). The stimulus. In B. I. Murstein (Ed.), Handbook of projective techniques (pp. 509-546). New York: Basic Books.
28. Piotrowski, Z. (1950). Perceptanalysis. New York: Macmillan.
29. Piotrowski, Z. A. (1964). Digital-computer interpretation of inkblot test data. Psychiatric Quarterly, 8, 1-26.
30. Piotrowski, Z. A., & Smolinsky, H. J. (1971). The computerized perceptanalytic Rorschach. Newsletter for Research in Psychology, 13, 47-48.
31. Rosen, L., Sears, D., & Weil, M. (1987). Computerphobia. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19, 167-179.
32. Ross, D. C. (1968). Computer processing of inkblot test data. Journal of School Psychology, 6, 200-205.
33. Rotter, J. B. & Rafferty, J. E. (1950). Manual: The Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank (College Form). Cleveland, OH: The Psychological Corporation.
34. Rotter, J. B., Lau, M. I., & Rafferty, J. E. (1992). Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank Manual (2nd ed.). New York: The Psychological Corporation.
35. Schnurr, P. P., Rosenberg, S. D., & Oxman, T. E. (1992). Comparison of TAT and free speech techniques for eliciting source material in computerized content analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58, 311-325.
36. Schuldberg, D. (1988). The MMPI is less sensitive to the automated testing format than it is to repeated testing: Item and scale effects. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 285-298.
37. Schuldberg, D. (1990). Varieties of inconsistency across test occasions: Effects of computerized test administration and repeated testing. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 168-182.
38. Schuldberg, D., & Nichols, W. G. (1990). Using HyperCard to administer a figurai test on the Apple Macintosh. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 417-420.
39. Smith, M. S. (1968). The computer and the TAT. Journal of School Psychology, 6, 206-214.
40. Veldman, D. J. (1967). Computer-based sentence-completion interviews. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 14, 153-157.
41. Veldman, D. J., Menaker, S. L., & Peck, R. F. (1969). Computer scoring of sentence completion data. Behavioral Science, 14, 501-507.
42. Watson, R. I. (1978). The sentence completion method. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders: A handbook (pp. 255-279). New York: Plenum.
43. Watson, C. G., Thomas, D., & Anderson, P. E. D. (1992). Do computer-administered Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventories underestimate booklet-based scores? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 744-748.
44. Wilson, R. F., Genco, K. T., & Yager, G. G. (1985). Assessing the equivalence of paper-and-pencil vs. computerized tests: Demonstration of a promising methodology. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 265-275.