DRUIDS - Detection of Regions with Unexpected Internal Deviation from Stationarity

Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution

Volumn 304, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 119-128

  Fedrigo, Olivier ^a   Adams, Dean C ^b   Naylor, Gavin J P ^c  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 17844376227     PISSN: 15525007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.21032     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Farris JS. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5:417-419.
2. Felsenstein J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst Zool 27:783-791.
3. Goldman N, Yang Z. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol 11:725-736.
4. Grassly NC, Rambaut A. 1997. A likelihood method for the detection of selection and recombination using sequence data. Mol Biol Evol 14:239-247.
5. Graybeal A. 1998. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst Biol 47:9-17.
6. Gu X, Vander Velden K. 2002. DIVERGE: phylogeny-based analysis for functional-structural divergence of a protein family. Bioinformatics 18:500-501.
7. Hillis DM. 1998. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. Syst Biol 47:3-8.
8. Huson DH. 1998. SplitsTree: analyzing and visualizing evolutionary data. Bioinformatics 14:68-73.
9. Kim J. 1996. General inconsistencies conditions for maximum parsimony: effects of branch lengths and increasing numbers of taxa. Syst Biol 45:363-374.
10. Koradi R, Billeter M, Wüthrich K. 1996. MolMol: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J Mol Graph 14:51-55.
11. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. 1982. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 157:105-132.
12. Lanavé C, Preparata G, Saccone C, Serio G. 1984. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J Mol Evol 20:86-93.
13. Lockhart PJ, Howe CJ, Bryant DA, Beanland TJ, Larkum AW. 1992. Substitutional bias confounds inference of cyanelle origins from sequence data. J Mol Evol 34:153-162.
14. Long M, Gillespie JH. 1991. Codon usage divergence of homologous vertebrate genes and codon usage clock. J Mol Evol 32:6-15.
15. Muse SV, Gaut BS. 1994. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol Biol Evol 11:715-724.
16. Naylor GJP, Gerstein, M. 2000. Measuring shifts in function and evolutionary opportunity using variability profiles: a case study of the globins. J Mol Evol 51:223-233.
17. Page RDM, Cotton J. 2002. Vertebrate phylogenomics: reconciled trees and gene duplications. Pac Symp Biocomp 536-547.
18. Poe S. 1998. Sensitivity of phylogeny estimation to taxonomic sampling. Syst Biol 47:18-31.
19. Rasmussen A-S, Arnason U. 1999. Molecular studies suggest that cartilaginous fishes have a terminal position in the piscine tree. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:2177-2182.
20. Saccone C, Pesole G, Preparata G. 1989. DNA microenvironments and the molecular clock. Mol Evol 29:407-411.
21. Storm CE, Sonnhammer EL. 2003. Comprehensive analysis of orthologous protein domains using the HOPS database. Genome Res 13:2353-2362.
22. Swofford DL. 1999. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, ver. 4.02ba. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
23. Swofford DL, Olsen GL, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis DM, Morowitz C, Mable BK, editors. Molecular systematics, 2nd edition. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. p 407-514.
24. Swofford DL, Waddell PJ, Huelsenbeck JP, Foster PG, Lewis PO, Rogers JS. 2001. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst Biol 50:526-539.
25. Takezaki N, Gobojori T. 1999. Correct and incorrect vertebrate phylogenies obtained by the entire mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol 16:590-601.
26. Wright F. 1990. The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. Gene 87:23-29.
27. Xia D, Yu C-A, Kim H, Xia J-Z, Kachurin AM, Zhang L, Yu L, Deisenhofer J. 1997. Crystal structure of the cytochrome bc1 complex from bovine heart mitochondria. Science 277:60-66.
28. Yang Z, Nielsen R, Goldman N, Pedersen AM. 2000. Codon-substitution models for heterogenous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics 155:431-449.
29. Yokoyama S, Radlwimmer FB. 1998. The "five-sites" rule and the evolution of red and green color vision of mammals. Mol Biol Evol 15:560-567.
30. Zamyatin AA. 1972. Protein volume in solution. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 24:107-123.