Dynamic learning and context-dependence in sequential, attribute-based, stated-preference valuation questions

Land Economics

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 114-126

  Holmes, Thomas P ^a   Boyle, Kevin J ^b  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ECONOMETRICS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY;

EID: 17644417751     PISSN: 00237639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3368/le.81.1.114     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adamowicz, W., J. Louviere, and M. Williams. 1994. "Combining Stated and Revealed Preference Methods for Valuating Environmental Amenities." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 (3): 271-92.
2. Adamowicz, W., J. Louviere, and J. Swait. 1998. Introduction to Attribute-Based Stated Choice Methods. Final Report to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Department of Commerce. Washington, D.C: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
3. Alberini, A., B. Kanninen, and R. T. Carson. 1997. "Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data." Land Economics 73 (Aug.): 309-24.
4. Ben-Akiva, M., and S. R. Lerman. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
5. Ben-Akiva, M., T. Morikawa, and F. Shiroishi. 1992. "Analysis of the Reliability of Preference Ranking Data." Journal of Business Research 24 (2): 149-64.
6. Bennett, J., and R. Blamey. 2001. The Choice Modeling Approach to Environmental Valuation. Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar.
7. Boyle, K. J. 2003. "Contingent Valuation in Practice." In A Primer on Non-Market Valuation, ed. P. A. Champ, K. J. Boyle, and T. C. Brown. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. DeShazo, J. R. 2002. "Designing Transactions without Framing Effects in Iterative Question Formats." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43 (3): 360-85.
9. DeShazo, J. R., and G. Fermo. 2002. "Designing Choice Sets for Stated-preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 (1): 123-43.
10. Greene, W. H. 1997. Econometric Analysis. 3rd. ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
11. Herriges, J. A., and J. F. Shogren. 1996. "Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up Questioning." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30 (1): 112-31.
12. Holmes, T. P., and W. L. Adamowicz. 2003. "Attribute-Based Methods." In A Primer on Non-Market Valuation, ed. P. A. Champ, K. J. Boyle and T. C. Brown. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Hsiao, C. 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Huber, J., J. W. Payne, and C. Puto. 1982. "Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis." Journal of Consumer Research 9 (June): 90-98.
15. Johnson, F. R. and W. H. Desvousges. 1997. "Estimating Stated-preferences with Rated-Pair Data: Environment, Health, and Employment Effects of Energy Programs." Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34 (1): 79-99.
16. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk." Econometrica 47 (2): 263-91.
17. Lancaster, K. 1966. "A New Approach to Consumer Theory." Journal of Political Economy 74 (2): 132-57.
18. Louviere, J. J., R. J. Meyer, D. S. Bunch, R. Carson, B. Dellaert, W. M. Hanemann, D. Hensher, and J. Irwin. 1999. "Combining Sources of Preference Data for Modeling Complex Decision Processes." Marketing Letters 10 (3): 205-17.
19. Louviere, J. J., D. A. Hensher, and J. D. Swait. 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Machina, M. J. 1999. "A Challenge to the 'Econoclasts': A Commentary on 'Rationality for Economists?"' Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19 (1-3): 107-8.
21. McFadden, D. 1999. "Rationality for Economists?" Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19 (1-3): 73-105.
22. Mitchell, R. C., and R. C. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods - The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
23. Sen, A. 1993. "Internal Consistency of Choice." Econometrica 61 (3): 495-521.
24. Sen, A. 1997. "Maximization and the Act of Choice." Econometrica 65 (4): 745-79.
25. Simonson, I., and A. Tversky. 1992. "Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion." Journal of Marketing Research 29 (August): 281-95.
26. Swait, J., and J. Louviere. 1993. "The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models." Journal of Marketing Research 30 (Aug.): 305-14.
27. Swait, J., and W. Adamowicz. 2001. "The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching." Journal of Consumer Research 28 (June): 135-48.
28. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1991. "Loss Aversion in Riskless. Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model." Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4): 1039-61.
29. Tversky, A., and I. Simonson. 1993. "Context-dependent Preferences." Management Science 39 (10): 1179-89.