Maternal effects and heterosis influence the fitness of plant hybrids

New Phytologist

Volumn 166, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 685-694

  Kirk, Heather ^a   Vrieling, Klaas ^a   Klinkhamer, Peter G L ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Genotype by environment interactions; Heterosis; Hybrid fitness; Hybridization; Maternal effects; Senecio aquaticus; Senecio jacobaea (ragwort)

Indexed keywords

WATER;

FITNESS; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HETEROSIS; HYBRIDIZATION; MATERNAL EFFECT;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CROSS BREEDING; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT ROOT; SENECIO; SOIL;

BIOMASS; CROSSES, GENETIC; ENVIRONMENT; PLANT ROOTS; SELECTION (GENETICS); SENECIO; SOIL; WATER;

SENECIO AQUATICUS; SENECIO JACOBAEA;

EID: 17644399487     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01370.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arnold ML. 1997. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2. Arnold ML, Hodges SA. 1995. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 67-71.
3. Barton NH, Hewitt GM. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 113-148.
4. Burke JM, Carney SE, Arnold ML. 1998. Hybrid fitness in the Louisiana irises: Analysis of parental and F-1 performance. Evolution 52: 37-43.
5. Campbell DR, Waser NM. 2001. Genotype-by-environment interaction and the fitness of plant hybrids in the wild. Evolution 55: 669-676.
6. Carney SE, Gardner KA, Rieseberg LH. 2000. Evolutionary changes over the 50-year history of a hybrid population of sunflowers (Helianthus). Evolution 54: 462-447.
7. Chater AO, Walters SM. 1976. Senecio L. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burgers NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA. Flora Europaea, Vol. 4, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 191-205.
8. Fox CW, Czesak ME, Mousseau TA, Roff DA. 1999. The evolutionary genetics of an adaptive maternal effect: egg size plasticity in a seed beetle. Evolution 53: 552-560.
9. Green BF Jr, Tukey JW. 1960. Complex analyses of variance: General problems. Psychometrika 25: 127-152.
10. Harrison RG. 1986. Pattern and process in a narrow hybrid zone. Heredity 56: 337-349.
11. Harrison RG. 1990. Hybrid zones: windows on evolutionary process. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 7: 69-128.
12. Howard DJ. 1986. A zone of overlap and hybridization between two ground cricket species. Evolution 40: 34-43.
13. Jaenisch R, Bird A. 2003. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nature Genetics 33: 245-254.
14. Johnston JA, Grise DJ, Donovan LA, Arnold ML. 2001. Environment-dependent performance and fitness of Iris brevicaulis, I-fulva (Iridaceae), and hybrids. American Journal of Botany 88: 933-938.
15. Kirk H, Macel M, Klinkhamer PGL, Vrieling K. 2004. Natural hybridization between Senecio jacobaea and Senecio aquaticus: Molecular and chemical evidence. Molecular Ecology 13: 2267-2274.
16. Klinkhamer PGL, De Jong TJ. 1987. Plant size and seed production in the monocarpic perennial Cynoglossum officinale L. New Phytologist 106: 773-783.
17. Lowe AJ, Abbott RJ. 2000. Routes of origin of two recently evolved hybrid taxa: Senecio vulgaris var. Hibernicus and York radiate groundsel (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 1159-1167.
18. Moore. 1977. An evaluation of narrow hybrid zones in vertebrates. Quarterly Review of Biology 52: 263-267.
19. Parris MJ. 2001. High larval performance of leopard frog hybrids: effects of environment-dependent selection. Ecology 82: 3001-3009.
20. Pelser PB, Gravendeel B, van der Meijden R. 2003. Phylogeny reconstruction in the gap between too little and too much divergence: the closest relatives of Senecio jacobaea (Asteraceae) according to DNA sequences and AFLPs. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 613-628.
21. Platenkamp GAJ, Shaw RG. 1993. Environmental and genetic maternal effects on seed characters in. Nemophila Menziesii. Evolution 47: 540-555.
22. Rieseberg LH. 1997. Hybrid origins of plant species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 359-389.
23. Rieseberg LH, Baird SJE, Gardner KA. 2000. Hybridization, introgression, and linkage evolution. Plant Molecular Biology 42: 205-224.
24. Rieseberg LH, Carney SE. 1998. Plant hybridization. New Phytologist 140: 599-624.
25. Roach DA, Wulff RD. 1987. Maternal effects in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 209-235.
26. Seehausen O. 2004. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 198-207.
27. Stace CA. 1975. Hybridization and the Flora of the British Isles. London, UK: Academic Press for the Botanical Society for the British Isles.
28. Thiede DA. 1998. Maternal inheritance and its effect on adaptive evolution: a quantitative genetic analysis of maternal effects in a natural plant population. Evolution 52: 998-1015.
29. Wang H, McArthur ED, Sanderson SC, Graham JH, Freeman DC. 1997. Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemesia tridentata: Asteraceae). 4. Reciprocal transplant experiments. Evolution 51: 95-102.
30. Weeda EJ, van Deursen CGM. 1994. Oecologische Flora: Wilde Planten En Hun Relaties, 3. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IVN, 102-109.