Perspective-taking judgments among young adults, middle-aged, and elderly people

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 53-60

  Catherine, Ligneau Hervé ^a   Mullet, Etienne ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

^b PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c François Rabelais University ^*  (France)

Author keywords

Aging; Information integration; Judgment; Perspective taking

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COGNITION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 17444392073     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.11.1.53     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anderson, N. H. (1996). A functional theory of cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Anderson, N. H., & Barrios, A. A. (1961). Primacy effects in personality impression formation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 346-350.
3. Arriaga, X. B., & Rusbult, C. E. (1998). Standing in my partner's shoes: Partner perspective taking and reactions to accommodative dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 927-948.
4. Asendorpf, J. B., Warkentin, V., & Baudonniere, P. M. (1996). Self-awareness and other awareness. II: Mirror self-recognition, social contingency awareness, and synchronic imitation. Developmental Psychology, 32, 313-321.
5. Balzer, W. K., Doherty, M. E., & O'Connor, R., Jr. (1989). Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 410-433.
6. Butler, K., Zacks, R. T., & Henderson, J. M. (1996, April). Age comparisons on an antisaccade task. Poster presented at the 1996 Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.
7. Carlson, M. C., Hasher, L., Connelly, S. L., & Zacks, R. T. (1995). Aging, distraction, and the benefits of predictable location. Psychology and Aging, 10, 427-436.
8. Chap, J. B. (1986). Moral judgment in middle and late adulthood: The effect of age-appropriate moral dilemmas and spontaneous role taking. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 22, 161-171.
9. Chasseigne, G., Lafon, P., & Mullet, E. (2002). Aging and rule learning: The case of the multiplicative law. American Journal of Psychology, 115, 315-330.
10. Chasseigne, G., Ligneau, C., Grau, S., Le Gall, A., Roque, M., & Mullet, E. (2004). Aging and probabilistic learning in single- and multiple-cue tasks. Experimental Aging Research, 30, 1-23.
11. Chasseigne, G., & Mullet, E. (2000). Probabilistic functionalism and cognitive aging. In K. R. Hammond & T. R. Stewart (Eds.), The essential Brunswik: Beginnings, explications, applications (pp. 423-426). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12. Chasseigne, G., Mullet, E., & Stewart, T. (1997). Aging and probability learning: The case of inverse relationships. Acta Psychologica, 97, 235-252.
13. Connelly, S. L., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1991). Age and reading: The impact of distraction. Psychology and Aging, 6, 533-541.
14. Dywan, J., & Murphy, W. E. (1996). Aging and inhibitory control in text comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 11, 199-206.
15. Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Cumberland, A., & Carlo, G. (1999). Consistency and development of prosocial dispositions: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 70, 1360-1372.
16. Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., & Koller, S. (2001). Brazilian adolescents' prosocial moral judgment and behavior: Relations to sympathy, perspective taking, gender-role orientation, and demographic characteristics. Child Development, 72, 518-534.
17. Fabes, R. A., Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. (1990). Maternal correlates of children's vicarious emotional responsiveness. Developmental Psychology, 26, 639-648.
18. Grant, J. D., & Dagenbach, D. (2000). Further considerations regarding inhibitory processes, working memory, and cognitive aging. American Journal of Psychology, 113, 69-94.
19. Hughes, C., & Dunn, J. (1998). Understanding mind and emotion: Longitudinal associations with mental-state talk between young friends. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1026-1037.
20. Long, E. C. (1990). Measuring dyadic perspective taking: Two scales for assessing perspective taking in marriage and similar dyads. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 91-103.
21. Long, E. C., & Andrews, D. W. (1990). Perspective taking as a predictor of marital adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 126-131.
22. Martini, T. S., Grusec, J. E., & Bernardini, S. C. (2001). Effects of interpersonal control, perspective taking, and attributions on older mothers' and adult daughters' satisfaction with their helping relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 688-705.
23. May, C. P., & Hasher, L. (1998). Synchrony effects in inhibitory control over thought and action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 363-376.
24. Meeks, B. S., Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1998). Communication, love, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 755-773.
25. Nadig, A. S., & Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science, 13, 329-336.
26. Park, D., & Schwarz, N. (2000). Cognitive aging: A primer. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
27. Peters, E., Finucane, M. L., MacGregor, D. G., & Slovic, P. (2000). The bearable lightness of aging: Judgment and decision processes in older adults. In P. C. Stern and L. L. Carstensen (Eds.), The aging mind: Opportunities in cognitive research (pp. 144-155). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28. Pratt, M. W., Diessner, R., Pratt, A., Hunsperger, B., & Pancer, S. M. (1996). Moral and social reasoning and perspective taking in later life: A longitudinal study. Psychology and Aging, 11, 66-73.
29. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (2000). Cognitive neuropsychology of the aging brain. In D. C. Park and N. Schwarz (Eds.), Cognitive aging: A primer (93-114). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
30. Rice, G. E., & Okun, M. A. (1994). Older readers' processing of medical information that contradict their beliefs. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 49, P119-P128.
31. Royall, D. R., Cordes, J., & Polk, M. (1997). Executive control and the comprehension of medical information by elderly retirees. Experimental Aging Research, 23, 301-313.
32. Rupp, G. L., & Jurkovic, G. J. (1996). Familial and individual perspective-taking processes in adolescent females with bulimic symptomatology. American Journal of Family Therapy, 24, 75-82.
33. Sanfey, A. G., & Hastie, R. (1999). Judgment and decision making across the adult life span: A tutorial review of psychological research. In D. Park & N. Schwartz, (Eds.), Cognitive aging: A primer (pp. 219-236). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
34. Santoro, J., & Spiers, M. (1994). Social cognitive factors in brain injuryassociated personality change. Brain Injury, 8, 265-276.
35. Spiers, M. V., Pouk, J. A., & Santoro, J. (1994). Examining perspective taking in the severely head injured. Brain Injury, 8, 463-473.
36. Stuss, D. T., Gallup, G. G., & Alexander, M. P. (2001). The frontal lobes are necessary for "theory of mind." Brain, 124, 279-286.
37. Troutman, C. M., & Shanteau, J. (1976). Do consumers evaluate products by adding or averaging attribute information. Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 101-106.
38. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974, September 27). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
39. Underwood, B., & Moore, B. (1982). Perspective taking and altruism. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 143-173.
40. Wai-Ming, V. M. (2002). Psychological predictors of marital adjustment in breast cancer patients. Psychology, Health, and Medicine, 7, 37-51.
41. Waldstein, S. R., (2000). Health effects on cognitive aging. In P. L. Stern and L. L. Carstensen (Eds.), The aging mind: Opportunities in cognitive research (pp. 189-217). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. Wills, C. E., & Moore, C. F. (1996). Perspective-taking judgments of medication acceptance: Inferences from relative importance about the impact and combination of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 251-267.