A broader perspective: Counseling psychology's emphasis on evidence

Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 27-38

  Wampold, Bruce E ^a   Lichtenberg, James W ^b   Waehler, Charles A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Counseling psychology; Empirically supported treatments; Evidence based practice; Psychotherapy

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; COUNSELING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; REVIEW;

EID: 17444384529     PISSN: 00220116     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10879-005-0801-9     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Chambless, D. L., Baker, M. J., Baucom, D. H., Beutler, L. E., Calhoun, K. S., Daiuto, A., et al. (1998). Update on empirically validated therapies, II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3-16.
2. Chambless, D. L., Sanderson, W. C., Shoham, V., Bennett-Johnson, S., Pope, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., et al. (1996). An update on empirically validated therapies. The Clinical Psychologist, 49(2), 5-18.
3. Clement, P. W. (1999). Outcomes and incomes: How to evaluate, improve, and market your psychotherapy practice by measuring outcomes. New York: Guilford.
4. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.) (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage.
5. Crits-Christoph, P., Baranackie, K., Kurcias, J. S., Carroll, K., Luborsky, L., McLellan, T., Woody, G., Thompson, L., Gallagier, D., & Zitrin, C. (1991). Meta-analysis of therapist effects in psychotherapy outcome studies. Psychotherapy Research, 1, 81-91.
6. Crits-Christoph, P., & Mintz, J. (1991). Implications of therapist effects for the design and analysis of comparative studies of psychotherapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 20-26.
7. Deffenbacher, J. L., Oetting, E. R., & DiGiuseppe, R. A. (2002). Principles of empirically supported interventions applied to anger management. The Counseling Psychologist, 30 (2), 262-280.
8. Elliott, R. (1998). Editor's introduction: A guide to the empirically supported treatments controversy. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 115-125.
9. Fischer, J., & Corcoran, K (1994a). Measures for clinical practice: A sourcebook. Vol. 1. Couples, families, and children (2nd edition). New York: Free Press.
10. Fischer, J., & Corcoran, K. (1994b). Measures for clinical practice: A sourcebook. Vol. 2. Adults (2nd edition). New York: Free Press.
11. Follette, W. C., & Houts, A. C. (1996). Models of scientific progress and the role of theory in taxonomy development: A case study of the DSM. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1120-1132.
12. Foster, S. L., & Mash, E. J. (1999). Assessing social validity in clinical treatment research: Issues and procedures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 308-319.
13. Gladis, M. M., Gosch, E. A., Dishuk, N. M., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1999). Quality of life: Expanding the scope of clinical significance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 320-321.
14. Hayes, S. C. (1998). Scientific practice guidelines in a political, economic, and professional context. In K. S. Dobson & K. D. Craig (Eds.), Empirically supported therapies (pp. 26-42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Hayes, S. C., Follette, V. M., Dawes, R. M., & Grady, K. E. (1995). Scientific standards of psychological practice: Issues and recommendations. Reno, NV: Context Press.
16. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. Hunt, M. (1997). How science takes stock: The story of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage.
18. Jacobson, N. S., Roberts, L. J., Berns, S. B., & McGlinchey, J. B. (1999). Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: Description, application, and alternatives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 300-307.
19. Kendall, P. C., & Chambless, D. L. (Eds.) (1998). Empirically supported psychological therapies [Special section]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 3-167.
20. Kendall, P. C., Marrs-Garcia, A., Nath, S. R., & Sheldrick, R. C. (1999). Normative comparisons for the evaluation of clinical significance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67 (3), 285-299.
21. Kratochwill, T. R., & Stoiber, K. C. (2002). Evidence-based interventions in school psychology: Conceptual foundations of the Procedural and Coding Manual of Division 16 and the Society for the Study of School Psychology Task Force. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 341-389.
22. Lyddon, W. J., & Adamson, L. A. (1992). Worldview and counseling preference: An analogue study. Journal of Counseling and Development, 71, 41-47.
23. Lyons, J. S., Howard, K. I., O'Mahoney, M. T., & Lish, J. D. (1997). The measurement and management of clinical outcomes in mental health. New York: John Wiley.
24. Mann, C. C. (1994). Can meta-analysis make policy? Science, 266, 960-962.
25. Norcross, J. C. (2001). Purposes, processes and products of the task force on empirically supported therapy relationships. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38, 345-356.
26. Ogles, B. M., Lambert, M. J., & Masters, K. S. (1996). Assessing outcome in clinical practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
27. Schmidt, F. L. (1992). What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1173-1181.
28. Sederer, L. I., & Dickey, B. (Eds.) (1996). Outcomes assessment in clinical practice. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
29. Sexton, T. L., & Alexander, J. F. (2002). Family-based empirically supported interventions. The Counseling Psychologist, 30 (2), 238-261.
30. Shadish, W. R., Navarro, A. M., & Matt, G. E. (2000). The effects of psychological therapies in clinically representative conditions: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 512-529.
31. Stirman, S. W., DeRubeis, R. J., & Crits-Christoph, P. (2003). Are samples in randomized controlled trials of psychotherapy representative of community outpatients? A new methodology and initial finding. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 963-972.
32. Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures. (1995). Training in and dissemination of empirically-validated psychological treatments. The Clinical Psychologist, 48, 3-23.
33. Trierweiler, S. J., & Stricker, G. (1998). The scientific practice of professional psychology. New York: Plenum.
34. Wampold, B. E. (1997). Methodological problems in identifying efficacious psychotherapies. Psychotherapy Research, 7, 21-43.
35. Wampold, B. E. (2000). Outcomes of individual counseling and psychotherapy: Empirical evidence addressing two fundamental questions. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (3rd edition, pp. 711-739). New York: John Wiley.
36. Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Wampold, B. E., & Bhati, K. S. (In press). Attending to the omissions: A historical examination of evidence-based practice movements. Professional Psychology.
38. Wampold, B. E. & Brown, G. (in press). Effectiveness of outpatient mental health services: Psychotherapy works in the real world. Under contract, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
39. Wampold, B. E., Lichtenberg, J. W., & Waehler, C. A. (2002). Principles of empirically supported interventions in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 197-207.
40. Wampold, B. E., Mondin, G. W., Moody, M., Stich, F., Benson, K., & Ahn, H. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically, "all must have prizes." Psychological Bulletin, 122, 203-215.
41. Wampold, B. E., & Serlin, R. C. (2000). The consequences of ignoring a nested factor on measures of effect size in analysis of variance. Psychological Methods, 5, 425-433.
42. Whiston, S. C. (2002). Application of the principles: Career counseling and interventions. The Counseling Psychologist, 30(2), 218-237.