From systems to tissues: A revolution in learning in perioperative education

Education for Health

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 22-31

  Richardson Tench, Marilyn ^a,c   Martens, Erika ^b  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c Department of Nursing ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

Descriptive; Evaluation; Nurse education; Perioperative; Surgical specialty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CURRICULUM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; LEARNING; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; NURSING EDUCATION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESEARCH ETHICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TEACHER; TEACHING; THINKING; UNIVERSITY;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; LEARNING; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; PILOT PROJECTS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; STUDENTS, NURSING; SURGERY; TEACHING; VICTORIA;

EID: 17244379410     PISSN: 13576283     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13576280500042572     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Andersson, E. P. (1999). From vocational training to academic education: The situation of the schools of nursing in Sweden. Journal of Nursing Education, 38, 1-38.
2. Biggs, J. (2000). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press
3. Biggs, J. & Moore, P. (1991). Process of learning (3d ed.) New York: Prentice Hall.
4. Dall'Alba, G. (1991). Foreshadowing conceptions of teaching. Research and Development in Higher Education, 10, 163-73.
5. Dewar, A. (2003). Using nominal group technique to assess chronic pain, patient's perceived challenges and needs in a community health region. Health Expectation, 6, 44-52.
6. Entwistle, N. & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
7. McAllister, M. (2001a). Principles for curriculum development in Australian nursing: An examination of the literature. Nurse Education Today, 21, 304-314.
8. McAllister, M. (2001b). Principles in practice: An Australian initiative in nursing curriculum development. Nurse Education Today, 21, 315-322.
9. Martin, E. & Balla, M. (1991). Conceptions of teaching and implications for learning. Research and Development in Higher Education, 13, 298-304.
10. Marton, F. & Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning 1: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
11. Marton, F. & Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning II: Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46 115-127.
12. Mawn, B. & Reece, S, (2000). Reconfiguring a curriculum for the new millennium: The process of change. Journal of Nursing Education, 39, 3:101ff.
13. Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
14. Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics' conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 4, 217-231.
15. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education London: Routledge.
16. Richardson-Tench, M. (2001). Unmasked! The discursive practice of the operating room nurse: A Foucauldian feminist analysis. Unpublished thesis, Monash University.
17. Ruby, J. (1999). History of higher education: Educational reform and emergence of the nursing professoriate. Journal of Nursing Education, 3, 23-28.
18. Samuelowicz, K. & Bain, J. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93-112.