메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 62, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 668-676

Cost-effectiveness modelling of recombinant FSH (r-hFSH) versus urinary FSH (u-hFSH) in assisted reproduction techniques (ART) in Germany;Kosteneffektivität von rekombinantem FSH (r-hFSH) bei assistierten reproduktionstechniken (ART) in Deutschland - Modellierung im vergleich zu urinärem FSH (u-hFSH)

Author keywords

Assisted reproduction; Mathematical model; rechFSH; uhFSH

Indexed keywords

FOLLITROPIN; RECOMBINANT FOLLITROPIN;

EID: 17144447578     PISSN: 00165751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-33008     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (2)

References (41)
  • 7
    • 0032882566 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Recombinant versus urinary follicle stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction
    • (1999) Hum Reprod , vol.14 , pp. 2207-2215
    • Daya, S.1    Gunby, J.2
  • 18
    • 0034051145 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A double-blind, randomized study to compare recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH; Gonal-F®) with highly purified urinary FSH (Metrodin HP®) in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques including intracytoplasmic sperm injection
    • (2000) Hum Reprod , vol.15 , pp. 520-525
    • Frydman, R.1    Howles, C.2    Truong, F.3
  • 33
    • 0028820941 scopus 로고
    • Clinical assessment of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in stimulating ovarian follicular development before in vitro fertilization
    • (1995) Fertil Steril , vol.63 , pp. 77-86


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.