Integrated visual fields: A new approach to measuring the binocular field of view and visual disability

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 243, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 210-216

  Crabb, David P ^a   Viswanathan, Ananth C ^b  

^a NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Esterman; Glaucoma; Perimetry; ROC curves; Visual disability; Visual fields

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ESTERMAN VISUAL FIELD SCORE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTEGRATED VISUAL FIELD SCORE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MONOCULAR VISION; OPTOMETRY; PARAMETER; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; DISABILITY EVALUATION; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROC CURVE; VISION DISORDERS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 17144368064     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-004-0984-x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Altman DG, BlaRd M (1994) Statistics notes: Diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic plots. Br Med J 309:188 1:STN:280:ByuA3MbisVI%3D
2. Crabb DP, Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (1998) Simulating binocular visual field status in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 82:1236-1241 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7itlequw%3D%3D
3. Esterman B (1982) Functional scoring of the binocular field. Ophthalmology 89:1226-1234 1226-1234 1:STN:280:BiyC3MnislE%3D
4. Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Poinoosawmy D, McNaught AI, Crabb DP (1996) Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 80:40-48 1:STN:280:BymB28vltFU%3D
5. Friedman SM, Munoz B, Rubin GS, West SK, Bandeen-Roche K, Fried LP (1999) Characteristics of discrepancies between self-reported visual function and measured reading speed. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project Team. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:858-864 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3gtVCjtw%3D%3D
6. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839-843 1:STN:280:BiyB2svmtlA%3D
7. ML Harris NA Jacobs 1995 Is the Esterman binocular field sensitive enough? In: RP Mills M Wall (Eds.) Perimetry update 1994/95 Kugler Amsterdam 13-24
8. Hoeymans N, Feskens EJ, van den Bos GA, Kromhout D (1996) Measuring functional status: Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between performance and self-report (Zutphen Elderly Study 1990-1993). J Clin Epidemiol 49:1103-1110
9. Iester M, Zingirian M (2002) Quality of life in patients with early, moderate and advanced glaucoma. Eye 16:44-49 10.1038/sj.eye.6700036
10. Jampel HD, Friedman DS, Quigley H, Miller R (2002) Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis 43:1059-1067
11. Jampel HD, Schwartz A, Pollack I, Abrams D, Weiss H, Miller R (2002) Glaucoma patients' assessment of their visual function and quality of life. J Glaucoma 11:154-163 10.1097/00061198-200204000-00012
12. Mills RP, Drance SM (1986) Esterman disability rating in severe glaucoma. Ophthalmology 93:371-378 1:STN:280:BimB3cvnvVU%3D
13. Nelson, P, Aspinall P, Papasouliotis O, Worton B, O'Brien C (2003) Quality of life in glaucoma and its relationship with visual function. J Glaucoma 12:139-150 10.1097/00061198-200304000-00009
14. Nelson-Quigg JM, Cello K, Johnson CA (2000) Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:2212-2221 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czkvV2mtg%3D%3D
15. Noe G, Ferraro J, Lamoureux E, Rait J, Keeffe JE (2003) Associations between glaucomatous visual field loss and participation in activities of daily living. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 31:482-486
16. Parrish RK, Gedde SJ, Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC, Mangione CM, Montenegro-Piniella A (1997) Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 115:1447-1455 9366678
17. Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Jacko JA (2002) Impact of graphical user interface screen features on computer task accuracy and speed in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 134:857-862 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czkvV2mtg%3D%3D
18. Smith TL (1985) The effects of regression towards the mean on visual disability ratings. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 42:537-547
19. Turano KA, Rubin GS, Quigley HA (1999) Mobility performance in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:2803-2809 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FhsFygsA%3D%3D
20. Viswanathan AC, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (1997) Early detection of visual field progression in glaucoma: A comparison of PROGRESSOR and Statpac 2. Br J Ophthalmol 81:1037-1042 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7lvVyrug%3D%3D
21. Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D, Fontana L, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (1999) Severity and stability of glaucoma: Patient perception compared with objective measurement. Arch Ophthalmol 117:450-454 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3itFCisA%3D%3D