Appropriating electronic billing systems: Adaptive structuration theory analysis

Human Systems Management

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 235-243

  Schwieger, Dana ^a   Melcher, Arlyn ^b   Ranganathan, Chandrasekaran ^c   Wen, H Joseph ^a  

^a SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive structuration theory; Diffusion theory; Medical electronic billing systems; Technology adoption

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

ADAPTIVE STRUCTURATION THEORY; DIFFUSION THEORY; MEDICAL ELECTRONIC BILLING SYSTEMS (MEBS); TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 17044419644     PISSN: 01672533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. P. Attewell, Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing, Organization Science 3 (1992), 1-19.
2. B. Avolio and G.E, Dodge, E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice, Leadership Quarterly 11(4) (2001), 615-668.
3. S.R. Barley and P.S. Tolbert, Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution, Organization Studies 18(1) (1997), 93-117.
4. R.B. Cooper and R.W. Zmud, Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach, Management Science 36(2) (1990), 123-139.
5. G. DeSanctis and M.S. Poole, Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory, Organization Science 5(2) (1994), 121-147.
6. A. Giddens, Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis, University of California Press, Berkley, CA, 1979.
7. A. Giddens, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984.
8. T.L. Griffith, Technology features as triggers for sensemaking, Academy of Management Review 24(3) (1999), 472-488.
9. V.D. Hunt, Process Mapping: How to Reengineer Your Business Processes, Wiley, New York, NY, 1996.
10. R. Kling, Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research, Computing Surveys 12(1) (1980), 61-110.
11. T.H. Kwon and R.W. Zmud, Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation, in: Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, J.R. Boland and R. Hirschheim, eds, Wiley, New York, NY, 1987, pp. 227-251.
12. H.C. Lucas, Jr. and J. Baroudi, The role of information technology in organization design, Journal of Management Information Systems 10(4) (1994), 9-23.
13. W.J. Orlikowski, The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations, Organization Science 3 (1992), 398-427.
14. W.J. Orlikowski and J.J. Baroudi, Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions, Information Systems Research 2(1) (1996), 1-28.
15. G. Premkumar and K. Ramamurthy, The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of interorganizational systems, Decision Sciences 26(3) (1995), 303-336.
16. B.A. Reinig and B. Shin, The dynamic effects of group support systems on group meetings, Journal of Management Information Systems 19(2) (2002), 303-325.
17. W.D. Salisbury, W.W. Chin, A. Gopal and P.R. Newsted, Research report: Better theory through measurement-developing a scale to capture consensus on appropriation, Information Systems Research 13(1) (2002), 91-103.
18. R.K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1984.