The future of hydraulic tests

Hydrogeology Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 259-262

  Renard, Philippe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Analytical solutions; Derivative; Diagnostic plot; Heterogeneity; Hydraulic testing; Numerical modeling; Pumping test

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEOLOGY;

EID: 17044373234     PISSN: 14312174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-004-0406-5     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Al-Bemani AS, Guo BY, Ghalambor A (2003) The challenge of model identification in well test interpretation - A unique build up analysis case study. Petrol Sci Technol 21:879-899
2. Bardsley WE, Sneyd AD, Hill PDH (1985) An improved method of least-squares parameter estimation with pumping-test data. J Hydrol 80:271-281 10.1016/0022-1694(85)90121-0
3. V Batu 1998 Aquifer hydraulics: A comprehensive guide to hydrogeologic data analysis Wiley New York
4. Boulton NS (1954) The drawdown of the water table under non steady conditions near a pumped well in an unconfined aquifer. Proc Institution Civil Eng 3:564-579
5. Bourdet D (2002) Well test analysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam
6. Bourdet D, Whittle TM, Douglas AA, Pirard YM (1983) A new set of type curves simplifies well test analysis. World Oil 95-106
7. Butler JJ, Zlotnik VA, Tsou M-S (2001) Drawdown and stream depletion produced by pumping in the vicinity of a partially penetrating stream. Ground Water 39:651-659
8. Chow VT (1952) On the determination of transmissibility and storage coefficients from pumping test data. Trans Am Geophys Union 33:397-404
9. Cooper HHJ, Jacob CE (1946) A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history. Trans Am Geophys Union 27:526-534
10. H Darcy 1856 Les fontaines publiques de la ville de Dijon (The public fountains of the city of Dijon) Victor Dalmont Paris
11. KJ Dawson JD Istok 1991 Aquifer testing Lewis Publishers Boca Raton
12. J Dupuit 1863 Etude théoriques et pratiques sur le mouvement des eaux dans les canaux découverts et à travers les terrains perméables (Theoretical and practical studies of water flow in open channels and through permeable terrains) Dunot Paris
13. Gringarten A, Ramey HJJ, Raghavan R (1974) Unsteady-state pressure distributions created by a single infinite conductivity vertical fracture. Soc Petrol Eng J 14:347
14. Ground Water (2004) Notice of plagiarism. Ground Water 42:2
15. J Hadamard 1932 Le problème de Cauchy et les équations aux dérivées partielles linéaires hyperboliques (The Cauchy problem and the hyperbolic linear partial differential equations) Hermann Paris
16. Hamm SY, Bideaux P (1996) Dual-porosity fractal models for transient flow analysis in fractured rocks. Water Resour Res 32:2733-2745 10.1029/ 96WR01464
17. Hantush MS (1961) Drawdown around partially penetrating well. Proc Am Soc Civil Eng 87:83-98
18. MS Hantush 1964 Hydraulics of wells In: VT Chow (ed) Advances in hydrosciences, vol I Academic New York, London 281-432
19. Hantush MS, Jacob CE (1955) Nonsteady radial flow in an infinite leaky aquifer. Trans Am Geophys Union 36:95-100
20. R Horne 1995 Modern well test analysis 2nd edn. Petroway, Inc. Palo Alto
21. Hsieh PA (2000) A brief survey of hydraulic tests in fractured rocks. In: Faybishenko B et al (eds) Dynamics of fluids in fractured rock. Am Geophys Union, Geophys Monogr 122:59-66
22. Indelman P (2003) Transient pumping well flow in weakly heterogeneous formations. Water Resour Res 39:1287
23. Jacob CE (1947) Drawdown test to determine effective radius of artesian well. Am Soc Civil Eng, Trans 112:1047-1064
24. Kruseman GP, de Ridder NA (1992) Analysis and evaluation of pumping test data, vol 47. ILRI Publication
25. Lavenue M, de Marsily G (2001) Three-dimensional interference test interpretation in a fractured aquifer using the pilot point inverse method. Water Resour Res 37:2659-2675 10.1029/2000WR900289
26. LC Lebbe 1999 Hydraulic parameter identification Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York
27. TC Lee 1999 Applied mathematics in hydrogeology Lewis Publishers Boca Raton
28. McElwee CD (1980) Theis parameter evaluation from pumping tests by sensitivity analysis. Ground Water 18:56-60
29. Meier PM, Carrera J, Sánchez-Vila X (1998) An evaluation of Jacob's method for the interpretation of pumping tests in heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour Res 34:1011-1025 10.1029/98WR00008
30. Misstear BDR (2001) The value of simple equilibrium approximations for analysing pumping test data. Hydrogeol J 9:125-126 10.1007/s100400100133
31. Misstear BDR, Beeson S (2000) Using operational data to estimate the reliable yields of water-supply wells. Hydrogeol J 8:177-187 10.1007/ s100400050004
32. Moench AF, Ogata A (1984) Analysis of constant discharge wells by numerical inversion of Laplace transform. In: Rosenshein JS, Bennet GD (eds) Ground-water hydraulics, vol 9. Am Geophys Union, pp 146-170
33. Noetinger B, Gautier Y (1998) Use of Fourier-Laplace transform and of diagrammatical methods to interpret pumping tests in heterogeneous reservoirs. Adv Water Resour 21:581-590 10.1016/S0309-1708(97)00014-6
34. Papadopulos IS, Cooper HHJ (1967) Drawdown in a well of large diameter. Water Resour Res 3:241-244
35. R Raghavan 1993 Well test analysis Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs
36. Ramey HJ Jr (1982) Well-loss function and the skin effect: A review. Geol Soc Am 189:265-271
37. Renard P (2004) Hydraulics of well and well testing. In: Anderson MG (ed) Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences, vol 3. Wiley, New York (in press)
38. Rosa AJ, Horne RN (1991) Automated well test analysis using robust (LAV) non linear parameter estimation. In: 66th Annual Tech. Conf. and Exhb. of the SPE, vol. SPE 22679, Dallas, pp 191-206
39. Sánchez-Vila X, Meier PM, Carrera J (1999) Pumping tests in heterogeneous aquifers: An analytical study of what can be obtained from their interpretation using Jacob's method. Water Resour Res 35:943-952 10.1029/1999WR900007
40. Silliman SE, Caswell S (1998) Observations of measured hydraulic conductivity in two artificial, confined aquifers with boundaries. Water Resour Res 34:2203-2213 10.1029/98WR01375
41. Skjetne E, Auriault JL (1999) New insights on steady, non-linear flow in porous media. European J Mech B-Fluids 18:131-145
42. Spane FA, Wurstner SK (1993) DERIV: A computer program for calculating pressure derivatives for use in hydraulic test analysis. Ground Water 31:814-822
43. Stefhest H (1970) Numerical inversion of Laplace transform. Commun ACM 13:47-49, 624 10.1145/361953.361969
44. TD Streltsova 1988 Well testing in heterogeneous formation Wiley New York
45. Talbot A (1979) The accurate numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. J Inst Math Appl 23:97-120
46. Theis CV (1935) The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. Trans Am Geophys Union 2:519-524
47. Theis CV (1941) The effect of a well on the flow of a nearby stream. Trans Am Geophys Union 22:734-738
48. G Thiem 1906 Hydrologische methoden (Hydrological methods) Gebhardt Leipzig 56
49. van Everdingen AF (1953) The skin effect and its influence on the productive capacity of a well. Petrol Trans, AIME 198:171-176
50. van Everdingen AF, Hurst W (1949) The application of the Laplace transformation to flow problems in reservoirs. Petrol Trans, AIME 305-324
51. Vesselinov VV, Neuman SP, Illman WA (2001) Three-dimensional numerical inversion of pneumatic cross-hole tests in unsaturated fractured tuff. 2. Equivalent parameters, high-resolution stochastic imaging and scale effects. Water Resour Res 37:3019-3041 10.1029/2000WR000135
52. Walker DD, Roberts RM (2003) Flow dimensions corresponding to hydrogeologic conditions. Water Resour Res 39:1349 10.1029/2002WR001511
53. WC Walton 1996 Aquifer test analysis with Windows software Lewis Publishers Boca Raton
54. Warren JE, Root PJ (1963) The behaviour of naturally fractured reservoirs. Soc Petrol Eng J 3:245-255
55. Wenzel LK (1936) The Thiem method for determining permeability of water-bearing materials, Report Water- Supply Paper 679-A, US Geol Surv, Washington, DC
56. Williams DE (1981) The well/aquifer model, Tech. report. Roscoe Moss Company, Los Angeles, CA
57. Williams RE (1985) Comment on "Double porosity models for a fissured groundwater reservoir with fracture skin". In: Moench AF (ed) Water Resour Res 21:889-891
58. Wu YS (2002) An approximate solution for non-Darcy flow toward a well in fractured media. Water Resour Res 38:10.1029 10.1029/2001WR000269
59. Yeh HD, Yang SY, Peng HY (2003) A new closed form solution for a radial two-layer drawdown equation for groundwater under constant-flux pumping in a finite radius well. Adv Water Resour 26:747-757 10.1016/ S0309-1708(03)00046-0
60. Zambrano J, Zimmerman RW, Gringarten AC (2000) Influence of geological features on well test behavior. In: SPE Asia Pacific Conference on Integrated Modelling for Asset Management. Paper SPE 59398, Yokohama, Japan
61. Zhan HB, Zlotnik VA (2002) Groundwater flow to a horizontal or slanted well in an unconfined aquifer. Water Resour Res 38:1108 10.1029/ 2001WR000401