The challenge of model identification in well test interpretation - A unique build up analysis case study

Petroleum Science and Technology

Volumn 21, Issue 5-6, 2003, Pages 879-899

  Al Bemani, Ali S ^a   Guo, Boyun ^b   Ghalambor, Ali ^b  

^a SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY   (Oman)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aquifer; Composite system; Dual permeability; Dual porosity; Identification; Interporosity; Multiple realizations; Partial sealing; Pressure derivative; Reservoir modeling; Transient; Well testing

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PETROLEUM RESERVOIRS; POROSITY; PRESSURE EFFECTS;

PRESSURE DERIVATIVE;

WELL TESTING;

EID: 0038002894     PISSN: 10916466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/LFT-120017455     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Al-Ghamdi, Abdullah H., Issaka, Mohammed B. (2001). Uncertainties and Challenges of Modern Well Test Interpretation. SPE 71589, presented at the 2001 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers in New Orleans, Louisiana, September 30-October 3.
2. Bourdet, D., Ayoub, J., Pirard, Y. M. (1984). Use of pressure derivative in well test interpretation. SPE 12777, presented at the SPE California Regional Meeting held in Long Beach, CA, April 11-13.
3. Cinco Ley, H., Samaniego, V. F. (1989). Use and Misuse of the superposition time function in well test analysis. SPE 19817, presented at the 64th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers in San Antonio, Texas, October 8-11.
4. Daungkaew, S., Hollaender, F., Gringarten, A. C. (2000). Frequently Asked Questions in Well Testing Analysis. SPE 63077, presented at the 2000 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers in Dallas, Texas, October 1-4.
5. Ershaghi, I., Woodbury, J. J. (1985). Examples of pitfalls in well test analysis. JPT February:335-341.