A brief survey of hydraulic tests in fractured rocks

Geophysical Monograph Series

Volumn 122, Issue , 2000, Pages 59-66

  Hsieh, Paul A ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890165732     PISSN: 00658448     EISSN: 23288779     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1029/GM122p0059     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Abelin, H., L. Birgersson, J. Gidlund, and I. Neretnieks, A large-scale flow and tracer experiment in granite 1. Experimental design and flow distributions, Water Resour. Res., 27(12), 3017-3117,1991.
2. Batu, V., Aquifer Hydraulics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y. 1998.
3. Bredehoeft, J. D., and S. S. Papadopulos, A method for determining the hydraulic properties of tight formations, Water Resour. Res., 16(1), 233-238, 1980.
4. Dawson, K. J., and J. D. Istok, Aquifer Testing: Design and Analysis of Pumping and Slug Tests, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Mich., 1991.
5. Earlougher, R. C, Advances in Well Test Analysis, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas, Tex., 1977.
6. Ellefsen, K. J., P. A. Hsieh, and A. M. Shapiro, Relation between seismic velocity and hydraulic conductivity at the USGS Fractured Rock Research Site, U.S. Geological Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology Program—Proceedings of the Technical Meeting, Charleston, S.C, 1999, edited by D. W. Morganwalp, and H. T. Buxton, Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4108C, pp. 735-745, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo., 1999.
7. Ellefsen, K. J., J. E. Kibler, P. A. Hsieh, and A. M. Shapiro, Crosswell Seismic Tomography at the USGS Fractured Rock Research Site: Data Collection, Data Processing, and Tomograms, Open-File Report 98-510, U. S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo., 1998.
8. Hestir, K., S. J. Martel, S. Vail, J. Long, P. D’Onfro, and W. D. Rizer, Inverse hydrologic modeling using stochastic growth algorithms, Water Resour. Res., 34, 3335-3347, 1998.
9. Hsieh, P.A., and A.M. Shapiro, Hydraulic characteristics of fractured bedrock underlying the FSE well field at the Mirror Lake Site, Grafton County, New Hampshire, U.S. Geological Survey Toxics Substances Hydrology Program—Proceedings of the Technical Meeting, Colorado Springs, Colorado, September 20-24, 1993, edited by D. W. Morganwalp, and D. A. Aronson, Water Resources Investigations Report 94-4105, pp. 127-130, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo., 1996.
10. Hsieh, P. A., A. M. Shapiro, and C. E. Tiedeman, Computer Simulation of Fluid Flow in Fractured Rocks at the Mirror Lake FSE Well Field, in U.S. Geological Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology Program—Proceedings of the Technical Meeting, Charleston, South Carolina, March 8-12, 1999, edited by D. W. Morganwalp, and H. T. Buxton, Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4108C, pp. 777-781, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo., 1999.
11. Kruseman, G. P., and N. A. de Ridder, Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data, 3rd Edition, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, The Netherlands, 1983.
12. Long, J. C. S., K. Karasaki, A. Davey, J. Peterson, M. Landsfeld, J. Jemeny, and S. Martel, An inverse approach to the construction of fracture hydrology models conditioned by geophysical data, Abstract, Int’l J. Rock Mech. Mining Sci. and Geomechan., 28, 121-142, 1991.
13. Matthews, C. S., and D. G. Russell, Pressure Build-Up and Flow Tests in Wells, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas, Tex., 1967.
14. Mauldon, A. D., K. Karasaki, S. J. Martel, J. C. S. Long, M. Landsfeld, and A. Mensch, An inverse technique for developing models for fluid flow in fractured systems using simulated annealing, Water Resour. Res., 29(11), 3775-3789, 1993.
15. Moench, A. F., and A. Ogata, A numerical inversion of the Laplace transform solution to radial dispersion in a porous medium, Water Resour. Res., 77(1), 250-252, 1981.
16. Neuman, S. P., and P. A. Witherspoon, Theory of flow in a confined two aquifer system, Water Resour. Res., 5(4), 803-816, 1969a.
17. Neuman, S. P., and P. A. Witherspoon, Applicability of current theories of flow in leaky aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 5(4), 817-829, 1969b.
18. Neuman, S. P., and P. A. Witherspoon, Field determination of hydraulic properties of leady multiple aquifer system, Water Resour. Res., 8(5), 1284-1289, 1972.
19. Neuzil, C. E., On conducting the modified “slug” test in tight formations, Water Resour. Res., 18(2), 439-441, 1982.
20. Streltsova, T. D., Well Testing in Heterogeneous Formations, John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y., 1988.
21. Walton, W. C, Aquifer Test Analysis with Windows Software, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1996.
22. Wang, J. S. Y., T. N. Narasimhan, C.-F. Tsang, and P. A. Witherspoon, Transient flow in tight fractures, in Invitational Well Testing Symposium Proceedings, edited by T. N. Narasimhan, pp. 103-113, University of California, Berkeley, Calif., 1978.
23. Witherspoon, P. A., N. G. W. Cook, and J. E. Gale, Geologic storage of radioactive waste: Field studies in Sweden, Science, 277,894-900, 1981.
24. Witherspoon, P. A., I. Javandel, S. P. Neuman, and R. A. Freeze, Interpretation of Aquifer Gas Storage Conditions from Water Pumping Tests, 273 pp., American Gas Association, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1967.