1D arrangement of Au nanoparticles by the helical structure of schizophyllan: A unique encounter of a natural product with inorganic compounds

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 44, Issue 13, 2005, Pages 2030-2033

  Bae, Ah Hyun ^a   Numata, Munenori ^a   Hasegawa, Teruaki ^a   Li, Chun ^a   Kaneko, Kenji ^a   Sakurai, Kazuo ^b   Shinkai, Seiji ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KITAKYUSHU   (Japan)

Author keywords

Gold; Helical structures; Nanotechnology; Natural products; Organic inorganic hybrid composites

Indexed keywords

HYDROPHOBICITY; INORGANIC COMPOUNDS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; POLYSACCHARIDES;

HELICAL STRUCTURES; HELIX HOSTS; ONE-DIMENSIONAL (1D) ARRANGEMENT; SCHIZOPHYLLAN;

NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; GOLD; IMMUNOLOGICAL ADJUVANT; NANOMATERIAL; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND; SCHIZOPHYLLAN;

ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PARTICLE SIZE; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ADJUVANTS, IMMUNOLOGIC; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS, PHYTOGENIC; CARBOHYDRATE CONFORMATION; CARBOHYDRATE SEQUENCE; GOLD; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NANOSTRUCTURES; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PARTICLE SIZE; SIZOFIRAN; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY;

EID: 16844364407     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200462810     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. A. Fu, C. M. Micheel, J. Cha, H. Chang, H. Yang, A. P. Alivisatos, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10832-10833.
2. a) S. Yamada, T. Tasaki, T. Akiyama, N. Terasaki, S. Nitahara, Thin Solid Films 2003, 438-439, 70-74;
3. b) S.-J. Park, T. A. Taton, C. A. Mirkin, Science 2002, 295, 1503-1506;
4. c) J.-M. Nam, S.-J. Park, C. A. Mirkin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3820-3821;
5. d) E. Katz, I. Willner, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 6166-6235; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6042-6108;
6. d) E. Katz, I. Willner, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 6166-6235; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6042-6108;
7. e) C. M. Niemeyer, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 4254-4287; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4128-4158;
8. e) C. M. Niemeyer, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 4254-4287; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4128-4158;
9. f) B. Yang, S. Kamiya, K. Yoshida, T. Shimizu, Chem. Commun. 2004, 500-501;
10. g) H. Matsune, N. Nakashima, N. Kimizuka, Polymer Preprints, Jpn. 2002, 51, 2435-2436.
11. a) C. A. Mirkin, R. L. Letsinger, R. C. Mucic, J. J. Storhoff, Nature 1996, 382, 607-609;
12. b) L. Josephson, J. M. Perez, R. Weissleder, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 3304-3306; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3204-3206;
13. b) L. Josephson, J. M. Perez, R. Weissleder, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 3304-3306; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3204-3206;
14. c) J.-M. Nam, S. I. Stoeva, C. A. Mirkin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5932-5933.
15. a) A. P. Alivisatos, K. P. Johnsson, X. Peng, T. E. Wilson, C. J. Loweth, M. P. J. Bruchez, P. G. Schultz, Nature 1996, 382, 609-611;
16. b) J. J. Storhoff, A. A. Lazarides, R. C. Mucic, C. A. Mirkin, R. L. Letsinger, G. C. Schatz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4640-4650.
17. S. Connolly, S. N. Rao, D. Fitzmaurice, J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 4765-4776.
18. a) M. Brust, D. Bethell, C. J. Kiely, D. J. Schiffrin, Langmuir 1998, 14, 5425-5429;
19. b) Y. Kuwahara, T. Akiyama, S. Yamada, Thin Solid Films 2001, 393, 273-277;
20. c) T. Sagara, T. Kato, N. Nakashima, J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 1205-1212.
21. a) K. Tanaka, A. Tengeiji, T. Kato, N. Toyama, M. Shionoya, Science 2003, 299, 1212-1213;
22. b) M. Shionoya, Macromol. Symp. 2004, 209, 41-50.
23. K. Sakurai, S. Shinkai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4520-4521.
24. K. Miyoshi, K. Uezu, K. Sakurai, S. Shinkai, Chem. Biodiversity 2004, 1, 916-924.
25. a) H. Okumura, Y. Kawaguchi, A. Harada, Macromolecules 2003, 36, 6422-6429;
26. b) P. N. Taylor, M. J. O'Connell, L. A. McNeill, M. J. Hall, R. T. Aplin, H. L. Anderson, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 3598-3602; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3456-3458;
27. b) P. N. Taylor, M. J. O'Connell, L. A. McNeill, M. J. Hall, R. T. Aplin, H. L. Anderson, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 3598-3602; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3456-3458;
28. c) A. Harada, Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 456-464;
29. d) T. Michishita, M. Okada, A. Harada, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2001, 22, 763-767.
30. a) M. Numata, M. Asai, K. Kaneko, T. Hasegawa, N. Fujita, Y. Kitada, K. Sakurai, S. Shinkai, Chem. Lett. 2004, 232-233;
31. b) T. Hasegawa, T. Fujisawa, M. Numata, M. Umeda, T. Matsumoto, T. Kimura, S. Okumura, K. Sakurai, S. Shinkai, Chem. Commun. 2004, 2150-2151;
32. c) M. Numata, T. Hasegawa, T. Fujisawa, K. Sakurai, S. Shinkai, Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4447-4450.
33. a) J. J. Storhoff, R. Elghanian, C. Mucic, C. A. Mirkin, R. L. Letsinger, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1959-1964;
34. b) M. Brust, D. Bethell, C. J. Kiely, D. J. Schiffrin, Langmuir 1998, 14, 5425-5429.
35. D. J. Maxwell, J. R. Taylor, S. M. Nie, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9606-9612.
36. R. Takahashi, T. Ishiwatari, Chem. Commun. 2004, 1406-1407.
37. Electron tomography (ET) is a useful technique for reconstructing an object from a series of projections acquired by TEM. Recent development of fully digitized and automated TEM has enabled us to achieve three-dimensional ET images, not only to determine the size and distribution of objects but also to provide information about the morphology of them on the nanometer scale. Three-dimensional structures were reconstructed by processing a series of projections through a combination of IMOD and Amira. See: a) J. Frank, Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies, Academic Press, San Diego, 1996; b) P. A. Midgley, M. Weyland, Ultramicroscopy 2003, 96, 413-431; c) J. R. Kremer, D. N. Mastronarde, J. R. McIntosh, J. Struct. Biol. 1996, 116, 71-76.
38. Electron tomography (ET) is a useful technique for reconstructing an object from a series of projections acquired by TEM. Recent development of fully digitized and automated TEM has enabled us to achieve three-dimensional ET images, not only to determine the size and distribution of objects but also to provide information about the morphology of them on the nanometer scale. Three-dimensional structures were reconstructed by processing a series of projections through a combination of IMOD and Amira. See: a) J. Frank, Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies, Academic Press, San Diego, 1996; b) P. A. Midgley, M. Weyland, Ultramicroscopy 2003, 96, 413-431; c) J. R. Kremer, D. N. Mastronarde, J. R. McIntosh, J. Struct. Biol. 1996, 116, 71-76.
39. Electron tomography (ET) is a useful technique for reconstructing an object from a series of projections acquired by TEM. Recent development of fully digitized and automated TEM has enabled us to achieve three-dimensional ET images, not only to determine the size and distribution of objects but also to provide information about the morphology of them on the nanometer scale. Three-dimensional structures were reconstructed by processing a series of projections through a combination of IMOD and Amira. See: a) J. Frank, Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies, Academic Press, San Diego, 1996; b) P. A. Midgley, M. Weyland, Ultramicroscopy 2003, 96, 413-431; c) J. R. Kremer, D. N. Mastronarde, J. R. McIntosh, J. Struct. Biol. 1996, 116, 71-76.
40. This 1D alignment was reproducibly observed for Au nanoparticles with diameters of 2-20 nm, but not for those with a diameter of 250 nm.