Towards a six-continents social science: International relations

Journal of International Relations and Development

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 330-343

  Jørgensen, Knud Erik ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS;

EID: 16544392756     PISSN: 14086980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ALEXANDER, Jeffrey C. (1997) Fin de Siécle Social Theory: Relativism, Reduction and the Problem of Reason, London: Verso.
2. AMSTRUP, Niels (1989) 'The Study of International Relations: Old or New? A Historical Outline (1500 to 1939)'. Aarhus: Department of Political Science, Working Paper.
3. AYDINLI, Ersel and Julie MATHEIWS (2000) Are the Core and Periphery Irreconcilable? The Curious World of Publishing in Contemporary International Relations. International Studies Perspectives 1(3), 289-303.
4. BLEEK, Wilhelm (2001) Geschichte der Politikwissenschaft in Deutschland. München: Verlag C.H.Beck.
5. BROWN, Chris (2001) Fog in the Channel: Continental Relations Theory Isolated (Or an Essay on the Paradoxes of Diversity and Parochialism in IR Theory). In Robert M.A. CRAWFORD and Darryl S.L. JARVIS (eds) International Relations - Still an American Science: Towards Diversity in International Thought?, 203-19. New York: State University of New York Press.
6. BUZAN, Barry (2001) The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR. Review of International Studies 27(3), 471-88.
7. CRAWFORD, Robert M.A. and Darryl S.L. JARVIS, eds (2001) International Relations - Still an American Science: Towards Diversity in International Thought? New York: State University of New York Press.
8. DREYER, Hugh C. and Leon MARGASARIAN, eds (1989) The Study of International Relations: The State of the Art. London: Macmillan.
9. DUNNE, Tim (1998) Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
10. FORD FOUNDATION (1976) International Studies in Six European Countries: The United Kingdom, France, the Federal Republic of Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, Italy: Reports to the Ford Foundation. New York: The Ford Foundation.
11. FRIEDRICHS, Jörg (2002) A House With Many Mansions: European Approaches to International Relations Theory. Ph.D. thesis. München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.
12. GIESEN, Klaus-Gerd (2004) France. In Knud Erik JØRGENSEN and Tonny Brems KNUDSEN (eds) International Relation in Europe: Traditions, Perspectives and Destinations, forthcoming.
13. GRIFFITHS, Martin and Terry O'CALLAGHAN (2001) The End of International Relations. In Robert M.A. CRAWFORD and Darryl S.L. JARVIS (eds) International Relations - Still an American Science: Towards Diversity in International Thought?, 187-201. New York: State University of New York Press.
14. GROOM, A. John R. and Peter MANDAVILLE (2001) Hegemony and Autonomy in International Relations: The Continental Experience. In Robert M.A CRAWFORD and Darryl S.L. JARVIS (eds) International Relations - Still an American Science: Towards Diversity in International Thought?, 151-65. New York: State University of New York Press.
15. HASSNER, Pierre (2002) 'The United States: The Empire of Force or the Force of Empire'. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies, Chaillot Papers No. 54.
16. HAYWARD, Jack, Brian BARRY and Archie BROWN (1999) The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. HELLMANN Gunther, Klaus Dieter WOLF and Michael ZÜRN (2003) Die neuen Internationalen Beziebungen: Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
18. HOFFMANN, Stanley (1977) An American Social Science: International Relations. Daedalus (106), 41-60.
19. HOLDEN, Gerard (2004) The Relationship between Anglo-Saxon Historiography and Cross-Community Comparisons. In Knud Erik JØRGENSEN and Tonny Brems KNUDSEN (eds) International Relations in Europe: Traditions, Perspectives and Destinations, forthcoming.
20. HOLSTI, Kalevi J. (1987) The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston, MA: Allan and Unwin.
21. INOGUCHI, Takashi and Paul BACON (2001) The Study of International Relations in Japan: Towards a more International Discipline. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 1(1), 1-20.
22. JEPPERSON, Ronald L, Alexander WENDT and Peter KATZENSTEIN (1996) Norms, Identity and Culture in National Security. In Peter KATZENSTEIN (ed.) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, 33-75. New York: Columbia University Press.
23. JØRGENSEN, Knud Erik (2000) Continental IR Theory: The Best Kept Secret. European Journal of International Relations 6(1), 9-42.
24. KAHLER, Miles (1993) Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers. In John G. RUGGIE (ed.) Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form, 295-326. New York: Columbia University Press.
25. KATZENSTEIN, Peter J., Robert O. KEOHANE and Stephen D. KRASNER (1998) International Organization and the Study of World Politics. International Organization 52(4), 645-85.
26. KHALIDI, Rashid I. (2000) Edward W. Said and the American Public Sphere: Speaking Truth to Power. In Paul A BOVÉ (ed.) Edward Said and the Work of the Critic: Speaking Truth to Power, 152-86. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
27. MORAVCSIK, Andrew (2001) Constructivism and European Integration: A Critique. In Thomas CHRISTIANSEN, Knud Erik JØRGENSEN and Antje WIENER (eds) The Social Construction of Europe, 176-88. London: Sage.
28. NAU, Henry R. (2002) At Home Abroad: Identity and Power in American Foreign Policy. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
29. PUCHALA, Donald (1997) Some Non-Western Perspectives on International Relations. Journal of Peace Research 34(2), 129-34.
30. SCHMIDT, Brian C. (1998) The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. New York: State University of New York Press.
31. SCHMIDT, Brian C. (2002) On the History and Historiography of International Relations. In Walter CARLSNAES, Thomas RISSE and Beth A. SIMMONS (eds) Handbook of International Relations, 3-22. London: Sage.
32. SHIMKO, Keith (1992) Realism, Neorealism and American Liberalism. Review of Politics 54, 281-301.
33. SMITH, Steve (1985) International Relations: British and American Perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.
34. SMITH, Steve (1995) The Self-Images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory. In Ken BOOTH and Steve SMITH (eds) International Relations Theory Today, 1-37. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35. SMITH, Steve (2000) The Discipline of International Relations: Still an American Social Science? British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2(3), 374-402.
36. SMITH, Steve (2002) The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline. International Studies Review 4(2), 67-85.
37. SMITH, Steve (2003) International Relations and international relations: The Links Between Theory and Practice in World Politics. Journal of International Relations and Development 6(3), 233-39.
38. TICKNER, Arlene B. (2003) Hearing Latin American Voices in International Relations Studies. International Studies Perspectives 4(4), 325-50.
39. THOMPSON, Kenneth W. (1992) Traditions and Values in Politics and Diplomacy. Baton Rouge, LA and London: Louisiana State University Press.
40. VALBJØRN, Morten (2004) IR: Culture Blind or Culture Blinded? In Knud Erik JØRGENSEN and Tonny Brems KNUDSEN (eds) International Relations in Europe: Traditions, Perspectives and Destinations, forthcoming.
41. VASQUEZ, John (1983) The Power of Power Politics: A Critique. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
42. WALLACE, William (1996) Truth and Power, Monks and Technocrats: Theory and Practice in International Relations. Review of International Studies 22(3), 301-21.
43. WÆVER, Ole (1998) The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations. International Organization 52(4), 687-727.
44. ZIMMERN, Alfred (1939) L'Ensignement Universitaire des Relations Internationales. Paris: Institut international de cooperation intellectuelle.
45. ZÜRN, Michael (1996) We Can Do Much Better! Aber muß es gleich auf amerikanish sein? Zum Vergleich der Disziplin 'Internationale Beziehungen' in den USA und in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 1(1), 91-114.