Pseudophakic accommodation with translation lenses - Dual optic vs mono optic

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 450-457

  Langenbucher, Achim ^a   Reese, Sven ^a   Jakob, Christina ^a   Seitz, Berthold ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accommodative intraocular lenses; Cardinal points; Dual optic intraocular lens; Geometrical optics; Pseudophakic accommodation

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ARTICLE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; HYPERMETROPIA; LENS POWER; MYOPIA; OPTICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOPHAKIA; ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CORNEA; EYE REFRACTION; LENS IMPLANT; MATHEMATICS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ANTERIOR CHAMBER; CORNEA; HUMANS; HYPEROPIA; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MYOPIA; OPTICS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PSEUDOPHAKIA; REFRACTION, OCULAR;

EID: 16544390369     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00222.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allen, E. D., Burton, R. L., Webber, S. K., Haaskjold, E., Sandvig, K., Jyrkkio, H., Leite, E., Nystrom, A. and Wollensak, J. (1996) Comparison of a diffractive bifocal and a monofocal intraocular lens. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 22, 446-451.
2. Cumming, J. S., Slade, S. G., Chayet, A. and AT-45 Study Group (2001) Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens: results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Ophthalmology 108, 2005-2009.
3. Fisher, R. F. (1973) Presbyopia and the changes with age in the human crystalline lens. J. Physiol. 228, 765-779.
4. Fisher, R. F. (1977) The force of contraction of the ciliary muscle during accommodation. J. Physiol. 270, 51-74.
5. Fisher, R. F. (1986) The ciliary body in accommodation. Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. UK 105, 208-219.
6. Fukuyama, M., Oshika, T., Amano, S. and Yoshitomi, F. (1999) Relationship between apparent accommodation and corneal multifocality in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology 106, 1178-1181.
7. Gernet, H., Ostholt, H. and Werner, H. (1970) Die präoperative Berechnung intraokularer Binkhorst-Linsen. In: Versammlung der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Augenärzte, Vol. 122, Zimmermann, Balve, pp. 54-55.
8. Gray, P. J. and Lyall, M. G. (1992) Diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implants for unilateral cataracts in prepresbyopic patients. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 76, 336-337.
9. Haigis, W. (1995) Biometry. In: Augenärztliche Untersuchungsmethoden (eds W. Straub, P. Kroll and H. J. Küchle), Biermann, Köln, pp. 255-304.
10. Hardman, S. J., Rubinstein, M. P., Snead, M. P. and Haworth, S. M. (1990) Pseudophakic accommodation? A study of the stability of capsular bag supported, one piece, rigid tripod, or soft flexible implants. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 74, 22-25.
11. Hoffer, K. J. (1975) Mathematics and computers in intraocular lens calculation. Am. Intra. Ocul. Implant. Soc. J. 1, 4-5.
12. Holladay, J. T. (1993) Refractive power calculations for intraocular lenses in the phakic eye. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 116, 63-66.
13. Holladay, J. T. (1997) Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry and intraocular lens power calculations. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 23, 1356-1370.
14. Holladay, J. T., Prager, T. C. and Chandler, T. Y. (1988) A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 14, 17-24.
15. Keating, M. P. (1981) Lens effectivity in terms of dioptric power matrices. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 58, 1154-1160.
16. Knorz, M. C. and Seiberth, V. (1996) Die True-Vista-Bifokal-IOL. Ophthalmology 93, 17-21.
17. Küchle, M., Gusek-Schneider, G. C., Langenbucher, A., Seitz, B. and Hanna, K. H. (2001) Erste Ergebnisse der Implantation einer neuen, potentiell akkommodierbaren Hinterkammerlinse. Klin. Monatsbl. Augenheilkd. 218, 603-608.
18. Küchle, M., Nguyen, N. X., Langenbucher, A., Gusek-Schneider, G. C., Seitz, B. and Hanna, K. D. (2002) Implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens (1 CU). J. Refract. Surg. 8, 208-217.
19. Langenbucher, A., Huber, S., Nguyen, N. X., Seitz, B. and Küchle, M. (2003a) Cardinal points and object-image magnification with an accommodative lens implant (1 CU). Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 23, 61-70.
20. Langenbucher, A., Huber, S., Nguyen, N. X., Seitz, B. and Küchle, M. (2003b) Measurement of accommodation after implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber lens (1 CU). J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 29, 677-685.
21. Langenbucher, A., Seitz, B., Huber, S., Nguyen, N. X. and Küchle, M. (2003c) Theoretical and measured pseudophakic accommodation after implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. Arch. Ophthalmol. 121, 1722-1727.
22. Leyland, M. and Bloom, P. (1999) Intraocular lens design for pseudoaccommodation [letter]. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 25, 1038-1039.
23. McLeod, S. D., Portney, V. and Ting, A. (2003) A dual optic accommodating foldable intraocular lens. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 87, 1083-1085.
24. Nakazawa, M. and Ohtsuki, K. (1984) Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses: optical analysis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 25, 1458-1460.
25. Nishi, O. and Nishi, K. (1998) Accommodation amplitude after lens refilling with injectable silicone by sealing the capsule with a plug in primates. Arch. Ophthalmol. 116, 1358-1361.
26. Retzlaff, J. A., Sanders, D. R. and Kraff, M. C. (1990) Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 16, 333-340.
27. Rosenblum, W. M. and Christensen, J. L. (1974) Optical matrix method: optometric applications. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 51, 961-968.
28. Saladin, J. J. and Stark, L. (1975) Presbyopia: new evidence from impedance cyclography supporting the Hess-Gullstrand theory. Vision Res. 15, 537-541.
29. Schachar, R. A. (1994) Zonular function: a new model with clinical implications. Ann. Ophthalmol. 26, 36-38.
30. Snead, M. P., Harman, S., Rubinstein, M. P., Reynolds, K. and Haworth, S. M. (1991) Determination of the nodal point position in the pseudophakic eye. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 11, 105-108.
31. Steinert, R. F., Aker, B. L., Trentacost, D. J., Smith, P. J. and Tarantino, N. (1999) A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 106, 1243-1255.
32. Strenk, S., Semmlow, J. L., Strenk, L. M., Munoz, P., Gronland-Jacob, J. and deMarco, J. K. (1999) Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle and lens: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40, 1162-1169.