A dual optic accommodating foldable intraocular lens

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 87, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1083-1085

  McLeod, Stephen D ^a   Portney, V ^b   Ting, A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Visiogen Inc ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ARTICLE; CORNEA; EYE AXIS LENGTH; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; OPTICS; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; OPTICS; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 0041356924     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.87.9.1083     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Fisher RF. Presbyopia and the changes with age in the human crystalline lens. J Physiol (Lond) 1973;228:765-79.
2. Koretz JF, Handelman GH. Modeling age-related accommodative loss in the human eye. Mathematical Modelling 1986;7:1003-14.
3. Schachar RA. Zonular function: a new model with clinical implications. Ann Ophthalmol 1994;26:36-8.
4. Duane A. Are the current theories of accommodation correct? Am J Ophthalmol 1925;8:196-202.
5. Tamm E, Lütjen-Drecoll E, Jungkunz E, et al. Posterior attachment of ciliary muscle in young, accommodating old, and presbyopic monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 1991;32:1678-92.
6. Croft MA, Kaufman PL, Crawford KS, et al. Accommodation dynamics in aging rhesus monkeys. Am J Physiol 1998;275 (Regulatory Integrative Camp Physiol 44):R1885-97.
7. Atchison DA. Accommodation and presbyopia. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1995;15:255-72.
8. Hara T, Hara T, Yasuda A, et al. Accommodative intraocular lens with spring action part 1. Design and placement in an excised animal eye. Ophthalmic Surg 1990;21:128-33.
9. Gilmartin B. The aetiology of presbyopia: a summary of the role of lenticular and extralenticular structures. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1995;15:431-7.
10. Cumming JS, Slade SG, Chayet A, AT-45 Study Group. Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens: results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Ophthalmology 2001;108:2005-9.
11. Kuchle M, Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, et al. Implantation of a new accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 2002;18:208-16.
12. Pieh S, Marvan P, Lackner B, et al. Quantitative performance of bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses in a model eye. Point spread function in multifocal intraocular lenses. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:23-38.
13. Hardman Lea SJ, Rubinstein MP, Snead MP, et al. Pseudophakic accommodation? A study of the stability of capsular bag supported, one piece, rigid tripod, or soft flexible implants. Br J Ophthalmol 1990;74:22-5.
14. Lesiewska-Junk, Kaluzny J. Intraocular lens movement and accommodation in eyes of young patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:562-5.
15. El Hage SG, Le Grand Y. Physiological optics. Vol 13. Springer series in optical sciences. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1980:64-6.