Mechanisms of face perception in humans: A magneto- and electro-encephalographic study

Neuropathology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 8-20

  Watanabe, Shoko ^a,b   Miki, Kensaku ^a   Kakigi, Ryusuke ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b GRADUATE UNIVERSITY FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

Electroencephalography; Face; Fusiform gyrus; Magnetoencephalography; MT V5

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EYE MOVEMENT; FACE; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MOUTH; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOWEL;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 16444381142     PISSN: 09196544     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2004.00603.x     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Damasio AR. Prosopagnosia. Trends Neurosci 1985; 8: 132-135.
2. Damasio AR, Damasio H, Van Hoesen GW. Prosopagnosia: anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms. Neurology 1982; 32: 331-341.
3. De Renzi E, Perani D, Carlesimo GA, Silveri NC, Fazio F. Prosopagnosia can be associated with damage confined to the right hemisphere - an MRI and PET study and a review of the literature. Neuropsychologia 1994; 32: 893-902.
4. Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A, Perez E, McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J Cognitive Neurosci 1996; 8: 551-565.
5. Jeffreys DA. A face-responsive potential recorded from the human scalp. Exp Brain Res 1989; 78: 193-202.
6. Renault B, Signoret JL, Debruille B, Breton F, Bolger F. Brain potentials reveal covert facial recognition in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia 1989; 27: 905-912.
7. Allison T, Ginter H, McCarthy G. Face recognition in the human extrastriate cortex. J Neurophysiol 1994; 71: 821-825.
8. Halgren E, Baudena P, Heit G, Clarke M, Marinkovic K. Spatio-temporal stages in face and word processing. 1. Depth recorded potentials in the human occipital and parietal lobes. J Physiol (Paris) 1994; 88: 1-50.
9. Halgren E, Baudena P, Heit G, Clarke M, Marinkovic K, Chauvel P. Spatio-temporal stages in face and word processing. 2. Depth-recorded potentials in the human frontal and Rolandic cortices. J Physiol (Paris) 1994; 88: 51-80.
10. Lu ST, Hamalainen M, Hari R et al. Seeing faces activates three separate areas outside the occipital visual cortex in man. Neuroscience 1991; 43: 287-290.
11. Sams M, Hietanen JK, Hari R, Ilmoniemi RJ, Lounasmaa OV. Face-specific responses from the human inferior occipito-temporal cortex. Neuroscience 1997; 77: 49-55.
12. Ioannides AA, Liu LC, Kwapien J, Drozdz S, Streit M. Coupling of regional activation in a human brain during an object and face affect recognition task. Hum Brain Mapp 2000; 11: 77-92.
13. Liu J, Harris A, Kanwisher N. Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5: 910-916.
14. Swithenby SJ, Bailey AJ, Brautigam S, Josephs OE, Jousmaki V, Tesche CD. Neural processing of human faces: a magnetoencephalographic study. Exp Brain Res 1998; 118: 501-510.
15. Watanabe S, Kakigi R, Koyama S, Kirino E. Human face perception traced by magneto- and electroencephalography. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1999; 8: 125-142.
16. Watanabe S, Kakigi R, Koyama S, Kirino E. It takes longer to recognize the eyes than the whole face in humans. Neuroreport 1999; 10: 2193-2198.
17. Watanabe S, Kakigi R, Puce A. The spatiotemporal dynamics of the face inversion effect. A magneto- and electro-encephalographic study. Neuroscience 2003; 116: 879-895.
18. Watanabe S, Miki K, Kakigi R. Gaze direction affects human face perception in humans. Neurosci Lett 2002; 325: 163-166.
19. Watanabe S, Kakigi R, Puce A. Occipitotemporal activity elicited by viewing eye movements: a magnetoencephalographic study. Neuroimage 2001; 13: 351-363.
20. Miki K, Watanabe S, Kakigi R, Puce A. Magnetoencephalographic study of occipitotemporal activity elicited by viewing mouth movements. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 1559-1574.
21. Miki K, Watanabe S, Kakigi R. The interaction between auditory and visual stimulus relating to the vowel sounds in the auditory cortex in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study. Neurosci Lett 2004; 357: 199-202.
22. Yin RK. Looking at upside-down faces. J Exp Psychol 1969; 81: 141-145.
23. Valentine T. Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. Br J Psychol 1988; 79: 471-491.
24. Rhodes G, Brake S, Atkinson AP. What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition 1993; 47: 25-57.
25. Moscovitch M, Winocur G, Behrmann M. What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. J Cogn Neurosci 1997; 9: 555-604.
26. Farah MJ, Tanaka JW, Drain HM. What causes the face inversion effect? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1995; 21: 628-634.
27. Linkenkaer-Hansen K, Palva JM, Sams M, Hietanen J, Aronen HJ, Ilmoniemi RJ. Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120 ms after stimulus onset revealed by magneto- and electrencephalography. Neurosci Lett 1998; 253: 147-150.
28. Liu J, Higuchi M, Marantz A, Kanwisher N. The selectivity of the occipitotemporal M170 for faces. Neuroreport 2000; 11: 337-341.
29. Allison T, Puce A, Spencer DD, McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I. Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. Cereb Cortex 1999; 9: 415-430.
30. McCarthy G, Puce A, Gore J, Allison T. Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. J Cognitive Neurosd 1997; 9: 605-610.
31. Hoffman EA, Haxby JV. Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed neural system for face perception. Nat Neurosci 2000; 3: 80-84.
32. McCarthy G, Puce A, Belger A, Allison T. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II. Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. Cereb Cortex 1999; 9: 431-444.
33. Puce A, Allison T. Differential processing of mobile and static faces by temporal cortex. Neuroimage 1999; 9: S801.
34. Puce A, Allison T, Bentin S, Gore JC, McCarthy G. Temporal cortex activation in humans viewing eye and mouth movements. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 2188-2199.
35. Puce A, Smith A, Allison T. ERPs evoked by viewing facial movements. Cogn Neuropsychol 2000; 17: 221-239.
36. Puce A, Syngeniotis A, Thompson JC, Abbott DF, Wheaton KJ, Castiello U. The human temporal lobe integrates facial form and motion. Evidence from fMRI and ERP studies. Neuroimage 2003; 19: 861-869.
37. Kaneoke Y, Bundo M, Koyama S, Suzuki H, Kakigi R. Human cortical area responding to stimuli in apparent motion. Neuroreport 1997; 8: 677-682.
38. Bundo M, Kaneoke Y, Inao S, Yoshida J, Nakamura A, Kakigi R. Human visual motion areas determined individually by magnetoencephalography and 3D magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2000; 11: 33-45.
39. Kawakami O, Kaneoke Y, Maruyama K. Visual detection of motion speed in humans, spatiotemporal analysis by fMRI and MEG. Hum Brain Mapp 2002; 16: 104-118.
40. Sofue A, Kaneoke Y, Kakigi R. Physiological evidence of interaction of first- and second-order motion processes in the human visual system: a magnetoencephalographic study. Hum Brain Mapp 2003; 20: 158-167.
41. Dumoulin SO, Bittar RG, Kabani NJ. A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT. A quantitative analysis of sulcal patterning. Cereb Cortex 2000; 10: 454-463.
42. Gattass R, Gross CG. Visual topography of striate projection zone (MT) in posterior superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. J Neurophysiol 1981; 46: 621-638.
43. Van Essen DC, Maunsell JH, Bixby JL. The middle temporal visual area in the macaque: myeloarchitecture, connections, functional properties and topographic organization. J Comp Neurol 1981; 199: 293-326.
44. Tootell RB, Reppas JB, Kwong KK. Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 3215-3230.
45. Naito T, Kaneoke Y, Osaka N, Kakigi R. Asymmetry of the human visual field in magnetic response to apparent motion. Brain Res 2000; 865: 221-226.