The recognition potential during sentence presentation: Stimulus probability, background stimuli, and SOA

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 169-186

  Iglesias, Alfonso ^a   Martín Loeches, Manuel ^a,b   Hinojosa, José A ^c   Casado, Pilar ^a   Muñoz, Francisco ^a   Fernández Frías, Carlos ^b  

^a INSTITUTO DE SALUD CARLOS III   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c INSTITUTO PLURIDISCIPLINAR   (Spain)

Author keywords

Language; Probability; Recognition potential; Semantic processing; Sentences; Stimulus onset asynchrony

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MALE; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NORMAL HUMAN; PROBABILITY; SEMANTICS; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROSCIENCES; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 1642544716     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allport A., Wylie G. 'Task-switching', stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. Monsell S., Driver J.S. Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII. 2000;35-70 MIT press, Cambridge, MA.
2. American Electroencephalographic Society. Guidelines for standard electrode positions nomenclature. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 3:1991;38-42.
3. Brown C.M., Hagoort P., ter Keurs M. Electrophysiological signatures of visual lexical processing: open- and closed-class words. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 11:1999;261-281.
4. Büchel C., Price C., Friston K.A. Multimodal language region in the ventral visual pathway. Nature. 394:1998;274-276.
5. Duncan-Johnson C.C., Donchin E. On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology. 14:1977;456-467.
6. Fernández G., Heitkemper P., Grunwald T., Van Roost D., Urbach H., Pezer N., et al. Inferior temporal stream for word processing with integrated mnemonic function. Hum. Brain Mapp. 14:2001;251-260.
7. Friederici A. The neurobiology of language comprehension. Friederici A. Language Comprehension: A Biological Perspective. 1999;265-304 Springer-verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
8. Giraud A.L., Truy E. The contribution of visual areas to speech comprehension: a PET study in cochlear implants patients and normal-hearing subjects. Neuropsychologia. 40:2002;1562-1569.
9. Haarmann H.J., Cameron K.A., Ruchkin D.S. Short-term semantic retention during on-line sentence comprehension. Brain potential evidence from filler-gap constructions. Cognit. Brain Res. 15:2003;178-190.
10. Hagoort P., Indefrey P., Brown C., Herzog H., Steinmetz H., Seitz R.J. The neural circuitry involved in the reading of german words and pseudowords: a PET study. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 11:1999;383-398.
11. Hagoort P., Brown C.M. ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia. 38:2000;1531-1549.
12. Holcomb P.J., Mc Pherson W.B. Event-related brain potentials reflect semantic priming in an object decision task. Brain Cognit. 24:1994;259-276.
13. Hinojosa J.A., Martín-Loeches M., Gómez-Jarabo G., Rubia F.J. Common basal extrastriate areas for the semantic processing of words and pictures. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111:2000;552-560.
14. Hinojosa J.A., Martín-Loeches M., Casado P., Muñoz F., Carretié L., Fernández-Frías C., et al. Semantic processing of open and closed-class words: an event-related potentials study. Cognit. Brain Res. 11:2001a;397-407.
15. Hinojosa J.A., Martín-Loeches M., Muñoz F., Casado P., Fernández-Frías C., Pozo M.A. Electrophysiological evidence of a semantic system commonly accessed by animals and tools categories. Cognit. Brain Res. 12:2001b;321-328.
16. Hinojosa J.A., Martín-Loeches M., Casado P., Muñoz F., Fernández-Frías C., Pozo M.A. Studying semantics in the brain: the rapid stream stimulation paradigm. Brain Res. Protocols. 8:2001c;199-207.
17. Johnson R., Donchin E. Sequential expectancies and decision making in a changing environment: an electrophysiological approach. Psychophysiology. 19:1982;183-200.
18. Karayanidis F., Andrews S., Ward P.B., McConaghy N. Effects of inter-item lag on word repetition: an event-related potential study. Psychophysiology. 28:1991;307-318.
19. Kutas M. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited during rapid serial visual presentation of congruous and incongruous sentences. Johnson R., Rohrbaugh J.W., Parasuraman R. Current Trends in Event-Related Potential Research. 1987;406-411 Amsterdam, Elsevier. EEG Suppl. 40.
20. Kutas M. Views on how the electrical activity that the brain generates reflects the functions of different language structures. Psychophysiology. 34:1997;383-398.
21. Martín-Loeches M., Barceló F., Rubia F.J. Sources and topography of supramodal efects of attention on ERP. Brain Topogr. 10:1997;9-22.
22. Martín-Loeches M., Hinojosa J.A., Gómez-Jarabo G., Rubia F.J. The recognition potential: an ERP index of lexical access. Brain Lang. 70:1999;364-384.
23. Martín-Loeches M., Hinojosa J.A., Gómez-Jarabo G., Rubia F.J. An early electrophysiological sign of semantic processing in basal extrastriate areas. Psychophysiology. 38:2001a;114-124.
24. Martín-Loeches M., Hinojosa J.A., Fernández-Frías C., Rubia F.J. Fuctional differences in the semantic processing of concrete and abstract words. Neuropsychologia. 39:2001b;1086-1096.
25. McCarthy G., Wood C.C. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroen. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62:1985;203-208.
26. Nigam A., Hoffman J.E., Simons R.F. N400 to semantically anomalous pictures and words. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 4:1992;15-22.
27. Oken B.S., Chiappa K.H. Statistical issues concerning computerized analysis of brainwave topography. Ann. Neurol. 19:1986;493-494.
28. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 9:1971;97-113.
29. Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J. Event-related potentials and language comprehension. Rugg M.D., Coles M.G.H. Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-related Potentials and Cognition. 1995;171-216 Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
30. Perfetti C.A. Comprehending written language: a blueprint of the reader. Brown C.M., Hagoort P. The Neurocognition of Language. 1999;167-208 Oxford University Press, New York.
31. Perneger T.V. What is wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. Br. Med. J. 136:1998;1236-1238.
32. Picton T.W., Lins O.G., Scherg M. The recording and analysis of event-related potentials. Boller F., Grafman J. Handbook of Neurophysiology. 10:1995;3-73 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
33. Posner M.I. The attention system of the human brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 13:1990;25-42.
34. Rolke B., Heil M., Streb J., Hennighausen E. Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. Psychophysiology. 38:2001;165-174.
35. Rubin G.S., Turano K. Reading without saccadic eye movements. Vision Res. 32:1992;895-902.
36. Rudell A.P. The recognition potential contrasted with the P300. Int. J. Neurosci. 60:1991;85-111.
37. Rudell A.P. Rapid stream stimulation and the recognition potential. Electroen. Clin. Neurophysiol. 83:1992;77-82.
38. Rudell A.P., Hua J. The recognition potential and conscious awareness. Electroen. Clin. Neurophysiol. 98:1996a;309-318.
39. Rudell A.P., Hua J. The recognition potential and word priming. Int. J. Neurosci. 87:1996b;225-240.
40. Rudell A.P., Hua J. The recognition potential, word difficulty, and individual reading ability: on using event-related potentials to study perception. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 23:1997;1170-1195.
41. Sankoh A.J., Huque M.F., Dubey S.D. Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustments methods in clinical trials. Stat. Med. 16:1997;2529-2542.
42. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., Preelich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artefacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology. 23:1986;695-703.
43. Sereno S.C., Rayner K., Posner M.I. Establishing a time-line in word recognition: evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. Neuroreport. 9:1998;2195-2200.
44. Tueting P., Sutton S., Zubin J. Quantitative evoked potentials correlates of the probability of events. Psychophysiology. 7:1971;385-394.
45. Van den Brink D., Brown C.M., Hagoort P. Electrophysiological evidence for early contextual influences during spoken-word recognition: N200 vs. N400 effects. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 13:2001;967-985.